Internet communication discourse is the Internet language used by teenagers in online communication, and there has been a phenomenon of language alienation characterized by violence, vulgarity, and vulgarity. From an ethical perspective, further standardizing the language of young people's online communication requires paying attention to civility and health, respecting equal rights to speak, being sincere and correct, correcting self-identity, advocating relative freedom, and inheriting existing norms.

[Keywords]Youth; Internet communication; Language ethics; Ideological and moral education

Internet communication discourse is the Internet language used by teenagers in Internet communication. It is both a language and culture Phenomenon is also an ethical and moral phenomenon. Through the characteristics of young people's online communication discourse, we can capture the ethical connotations behind it that promote free individuality, emphasize utilitarianism, highlight self-dominance, and advocate happiness, and are accompanied by the emergence of violence, vulgarity, and vulgarity as symptoms. The phenomenon of language alienation. In discourse communication, the relationship between discourse information, discourse methods and discourse subjects will naturally be marked by the ethical relationship between the two parties, and they should also be restricted by corresponding speech ethics. Since ancient times, the Chinese nation has always admired the discourse ethics of "establishing one's words before one's morality" and "unifying words and virtues", advocating that speech behavior should comply with the principles of "propriety", "benevolence", "loyalty" and "faithfulness". Although these principles have developed to this day and their specific connotations have changed, they are still the verbal moral creed that people abide by or advocate. In the real society, people who are polite in their words, consistent in their words and deeds, and true to their words are always praised by people; on the contrary, those who speak without "property", speak without "benevolence", speak without "faithfulness" or speak without words. "Loyal" people are despised everywhere. This is true in the real society, and it is also true in the online virtual society. We must learn from the traditional Confucian ethics of caution, carefully sort out the ethical rules of online communication discourse, and continuously strengthen the moral education of young people's online discourse so that they can more clearly understand the importance of online discourse communication. What is ethical behavior and what is unethical behavior in activities, thereby enhancing moral awareness, taking on moral responsibilities, fulfilling moral obligations, developing healthy networks, and building harmonious network interpersonal relationships.

(1) From the content of online communication discourse, we must pay attention to civilization and health. From a discourse perspective, the network communication discourse derived from network communication in the network society is still an important communication tool. It is not only an extension of the scope of real discourse, but also an expansion of the function of real discourse. However, from an ethical perspective, discourse, including online communication discourse, is a direct reflection of ideological realm and moral quality. The vulgarity and vulgarity of discourse are, in the final analysis, a manifestation of the vulgarity of a person’s spirit and soul, and the vulgarization of values. specific reflection in discourse. Discourse civilization and health, as the basic social ethics for teenagers, not only require discourse civilization in real interpersonal interactions, but also in online interpersonal interactions. Among the 137 million Internet users in my country, the number of netizens under the age of 35 accounts for 82.5% of the total. Among them, teenagers are the vast majority and the main body of online communication discourse. However, some teenagers do not hesitate to express their opinions in online literature, chat rooms and BBS forums. Selling pornographic information, unrestrained rendering of violence, vulgar content, low style, backward thinking, and decadent will will inevitably hinder the pace of moral construction of young people, and have a great negative impact on socialist morals and the online communication environment. It affects the healthy development of Internet culture and will eventually harm the public interests of the Internet and netizens. Not only that, in real life, the negative effects of online communication discourse may also directly affect real interpersonal relationships and bring psychological barriers to real interpersonal communication. Since ancient times, China has said, "Don't look at anything that's not polite, don't hear anything that's not polite, don't say anything that's not polite, and don't do anything that's not polite" ("The Analects of Confucius·Yan Yuan"), which means that words and behaviors that are not in line with ethics and civilized etiquette should not appear in real-life communication. . The Internet is actually a continuation of real society. When young people communicate online, the content of their communication should be positive, elegant, healthy, civilized and polite, "in line with the mainstream direction of the construction of socialist spiritual civilization and in line with the legitimate interests of society." The same interests must be conducive to at least not hindering the improvement of social moral standards, and should not contain pornographic, violent, feudal superstitious content or insinuations and hints of these contents." In compliance with the "Internet Civilization Moral Convention", *** agrees Build a green network space and form a good network ecological environment.

(2) From the perspective of the subject of online communication discourse, equality of speaking rights must be respected. Equality is an important category in ethics and an important foundation for interpersonal harmony and social harmony. The principle of equality must also be adhered to in discourse communication. An important content of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is that everyone has equal rights to speak. This important ethical principle can be extended to the field of online communication. A very prominent feature of online communication is the equality of communication subjects. "No matter what the identity, status, belief, race, or gender of the other party, as long as all kinds of topics enter the Internet, you can chat together and perceive and understand society equally." Theoretically, every communication subject has different personality and values. They are all equal and are not affected by factors such as political status, economic status, educational level, professional division of labor, regional differences, gender, etc. Contemporary teenagers who are knowledgeable, quick-thinking, and challenge traditions should not be ignored. and belittle the natural equality of network subjects.

Of course, this equality of subject’s personal dignity and self-worth needs to be expressed through online communication discourse. "No party involved in online communication should show speech privileges, be arrogant or condescending, and cannot force the other party to accept their own expressions of intention." This requires young people to speak carefully when communicating online (forums, chat rooms) , put yourself in someone else’s shoes, learn to be tolerant, and reject the hegemony of discourse. From a macro perspective, discourse hegemony manifests itself in inequality and privilege in terms of language. From a micro perspective, it means that the discourse subject forces the other party to accept its unilateral opinions and thoughts during the communication process. This is very unfair to the other party. and disrespectful behavior. Therefore, from the ethical perspective of reciprocal intersubjective relationships, the opinions and thoughts of the other party must also be equally respected. Only in this way can honest and mutual trusting online communication be achieved.

(3) From the perspective of the motivation of online communication discourse, it must be based on sincerity and integrity. Sincerity and integrity as a moral appeal are also called sincerity. Mr. Chen Rudong, a discourse scientist, believes that sincerity in speech includes two aspects: first, the motivation and emotion of the speech subject reflected in the speech act are true and not hypocritical, that is, the speech expression of the speaker and writer should be consistent with his actual psychology; second, the speech is timely , that is, in the process of verbal communication, out of good intentions, provide necessary information to the communication partner in a timely manner. Sincerity is not a sign of honesty or even cowardice, it is a kind of moral cultivation and spiritual state of a person. In Shendu's view, the most important thing for a person's moral cultivation is to be "sincere". Sincerity is a virtue of being truthful and not deceiving. "Those who think sincerely are the way of human beings." ("Mencius Li Lou Shang") "A gentleman can cultivate his mind and be good at being sincere. If he is sincere, there will be nothing else." ("Bu Gou") "Those who are sincere in their intentions cultivate themselves. "The first chapter" ("Great Learning Chapters") "Sincerity is the foundation of the Five Constant Beings and the source of hundreds of things" ("Tongshu Cheng Xia"). Only when people sincerely abide by the human ethics of a certain society, be loyal and honest, be consistent in words and deeds, despise hypocrisy, and seek truth from facts can people sincerely act in accordance with moral norms and achieve the state of "doing what you want without going beyond the rules." In view of the bad phenomena of lying and gossip spreading in online communication, young people are required to give full play to the internal moral mechanism of "sincerity", because sincerity is a necessary condition for establishing and maintaining normal online communication and discourse order, and is an important factor in maintaining the online society. An important factor for stability and development, it involves multiple moral categories such as justice, fairness, good and evil, righteousness and interests. Shendu's "sincerity" requirement is to enable young people to "communicate with a sincere attitude, provide correct and reasonable discourse forms for the information to be expressed, have true motives and emotions, not be hypocritical, not spread unverified false information, and not deceive." Others should not intentionally or unintentionally misunderstand the people they communicate with, and at the same time, they should not deceive themselves, say things that go against their will, or tell lies. This way, while building a harmonious network between yourself and others, you can also develop good inner moral feelings and gain morality. Beauty”.

(4) Correct self-identity from the perspective of online communication discourse role. Marxist ethics believes that human behavior and identity are consistent, and speech expressions must conform to unique identities and roles. Due to the arrival of the Internet, people travel between real society and online society, and the different characteristics of authenticity and virtuality create different performances of people in them. In the real society, life is a drama, and the most important attribute of a person is social attribute. People cannot survive without society. In the real physical world, everyone has a corresponding social role, and there is a coordinated relationship between the discourse of real interpersonal communication and the social role played by the person. However, the Internet is a virtual world. “The various roles played by people online can only be regarded as virtual intelligent symbols. The images, images, texts and sounds that people see and hear become digital terminals. Appear, so that people can only communicate with each other in illusion." In other words, the blurring of online roles has caused teenagers, like other groups, to have phenomena where the discourse structure, discourse style, and discourse meaning are inconsistent or even completely opposite to the social roles they play, such as younger age discourse, gender confusion, and career ambiguity. wait. The words that represent social roles in discourse symbols are actually symbolic forms of ethical roles. Conversely, ethical relationships between people are also reflected in speech acts. The essential attribute of adolescents, like other groups of people, is sociality. It is their moral obligation to bear social responsibilities, and their ethical appeal is to abide by the moral norms of discourse. Whether online or offline, they should not forget their true identity, always grasp their social attributes, try to restore their original colors in online communication, speak in words that suit their gender and personality, and speak in words that suit themselves. In terms of identity and characteristics, the position of the words and the role should be correct, not offside, not out of place, not out of position, and the way of speaking should be basically consistent or completely consistent with the main body of the role.

(5) From the perspective of grasping the discourse of online communication, relative freedom should be advocated. From an ethical perspective, freedom is a category corresponding to regulations, a lofty ethical realm, a high degree of liberation of the human spirit, and ease of human moral behavior. On the surface, it seems to be indulgence and comfort that is completely free from fetters and constraints, but freedom is by no means an absolute freedom that is premised on ignoring or flouting regulations. It is not the kind of freedom that people understand to do whatever they want. This is a basic position that must be firmly believed in any field, including the Internet.

However, due to the free nature of the Internet, the Internet communication discourse rooted in the Internet also has the distinctive characteristics of freedom, so that many people believe that people on the Internet are absolutely free, and they can say whatever they want and say whatever they want. Almost We have forgotten the truth that "freedom is always accompanied by norms, rights are always accompanied by obligations, and absolute freedom never exists." The online world is no exception. Unrestrained freedom brings indulgence, and the tools of indulgence will not only harm the network actors themselves, but also endanger the free spirit of the Internet. Just imagine if everyone uses freedom as a guise to deceive each other and destroy wantonly, the result will be that everyone wants to be free and everyone wants to enjoy their rights, but no one will be free, and the existence value of cyberspace will eventually be jeopardized. Therefore, the online world also needs necessary regulations to protect freedom. Therefore, young people are required to conduct rational analysis based on factual evidence when commenting online, so as to express their independent opinions objectively and fairly, and take corresponding responsibility for their words and deeds. In other words, prudence should be the ethical guide, saying what should be said and not saying what should not be said. Only when everyone jointly abides by the principle of moderate freedom can we enjoy the fruits of human civilization with a high degree of freedom.

(6) From the perspective of creation of online communication discourse, existing norms must be inherited. Marxist ethics actively encourages creation and believes that creation is a valuable spiritual quality and source of strength for human beings, and only creation can lead to development. But creation is not fabrication out of thin air but creation based on inheritance - this is also true in terms of online discourse. Language innovation is a manifestation of the vitality of language. Without innovation, there will be no development of language. Any language should absorb valuable things from other good languages. Internet language provides a large number of resources for updating and supplementing Chinese, and expands the horizons of Chinese lexicon and grammar. Those new elements with positive meaning that can withstand the test of time should be embraced and nourished by modern Chinese. Therefore, we should respect the development of Internet language. From a mesoscopic perspective, the problem of online communication discourse actually includes two parts. One is the ethical and moral issue of the subject of online communication discourse; the other is the non-standard issue of online communication discourse itself, and the former directly affects the latter. Discourse is the most important communication tool for human beings. People use discourse to communicate, and an important condition for smooth communication is that the discourse used by the communicative subject must follow certain discourse norms. There are differences between online communication discourse and real-life communication discourse. For example, online communication discourse is mainly expressed in the form of words and symbols, which is virtual and transcendent. Real-life communication discourse is mainly expressed in sounds and body postures, and is realistic and direct. But there are similarities between the two. Regardless of the type of discourse, it must go through the brain's thinking. They are all creations based on existing knowledge structures and discourse habits, and they are all manifestations of people's moral consciousness and psychological tendencies. Despite this, in a certain sense, it can be said that online communication discourse is a re-tribalization of discourse, and online communication discourse seems to be intended to subvert various rules of modern discourse. Discourse itself is a cultural phenomenon. Discourse has its own inherent rules and regularity. As an extension and expansion of discourse, online communication discourse must respect the nature of discourse in the process of "processing" and "creation". Basic norms, inherit the fine tradition of real-life discourse, better exert the pragmatic function of online communication discourse, and better radiate the ethical charm of discourse. In the process of innovation, good traditions should not be forgotten, and perhaps it should continue to be applicable to the current development of youth online communication discourse.