Debate is also called debate and debate. Formally, it is a contest between two participants on a certain issue, but actually it is a contest of related knowledge, thinking and reaction ability, language expression ability and comprehensive ability around the debated issue. Here's what I sorted out: Is love eternal, or have I ever had an argument? Let's have a look.
Love lies in eternity as well as in argument. Thank you, Chairman, and thank you, judges:
After listening to the idealized romantic tone of the other debater, we were extremely ashamed. Because there is neither romantic imagination nor flashy rhetoric in our defense. Some are just real and undeniable objective facts and truths.
Now, I clearly put forward our view that "love is not eternal, but possession".
Human beings have two views on love, that is, the so-called "everlasting" love based on subjective imagination, that is, the love that exists as long as heaven and earth. And the love "once owned" based on objective facts, that is, the love that I have experienced before.
So, how can we really have love? It is true that from the day people fall in love, the pursuit of "love" is to hope that the love they once had can last forever. Whether it is "possession" or "lasting", it is people's desire and pursuit. However, in the real society, it is impossible to realize the "eternity" of nothingness that people pursue. In real life, the lure of money and the influence of "conditions" have obliterated many love dreams in the world, and it may be the choice of most people to pay, own and be happy for love.
Some people say: "Love is eternal, but there is no eternal love", which is a very philosophical interpretation.
Love is eternal, and what happens is always true. When we are in love, we really have each other. For love itself, everything that happened at that time is unforgettable. However, with the passage of time, the deepening of communication, social secular family pressure and other issues invaded. Love is fading until it disappears completely, but love once existed and we really paid for each other. Although it is not eternal, the love we once had is the most commendable love in the world. Those lovers who are similar in appearance are close at hand, but their souls are nowhere in the world. This kind of couple seems eternal, but love may not "live for a day". Isn't it?
Although the love I once had was a meteor, it was this short but vigorous and thorough moment that could bloom the most beautiful and dazzling brilliance, enough for both sides to remember for life! Perhaps nothing in this world is eternal, only endless thoughts and regrets! They will always haunt the lonely side! In other words, the true eternity is what we once had, because true love lies not in the length of time, but in whether two souls snuggle up to each other and make each other feel lonely.
Only in this way can it be called true love. Dear opponent debater! Wake up! Please return to our real world from the dream!
Finally, I once again remind other debaters not to stick to your idealistic romantic arguments. Your eternity can only be "to endure, to endure; The two will end one day, and this hatred is endless. " Let's live in objective reality and the world of mortals. Let's experience the true love together!
(free debate)
Argument: The other party just admitted that there is a difference between marriage and love. Then I would like to ask, marriage is not caused by love, why emphasize that "everlasting" leads to unhappy marriage? This is one of them. Second, what is the concept of "once owned" mentioned by the other debater? Does your "once owned" violate people's normal ethics? Please answer directly.
Arguments against all sides: indeed, when you walk into the marriage hall, you are thinking, yes, my love will last forever. However, after so long, you find, oh, it turns out that my love can only be owned once. But love has disappeared, and marriage has to continue. The disappearance of love does not mean the disappearance of responsibility. Responsibility still exists. (Applause)
Three arguments: then let's test for one month, just one month. If you find that your marriage is not based on love after one month, it proves that you got married not because of love, but because of responsibility.
The opponent argues: But at the beginning, we had a real and beautiful love, but because of the hardships of life, we don't love each other, so love can't last forever.
Positive argument: If your love can only last for one month, then I would like to ask, how many times have you experienced love and marriage in your life to satisfy your wishes?
Four opposing arguments: I want to say two things. First, we never said that our love can only last for one month. Second, love and marriage are two different things. Please don't change today's debate to: Is marriage everlasting or once owned? Now I want to ask my opponent, you just said that Liang Zhu is "eternal", but I'm afraid Liang Zhu was "once owned"!
Three arguments: Why is Liang Zhu not "eternal"? Didn't they all become butterflies and fly away? Are they solo? ! (warm applause)
Four arguments against it: she is just a myth, but in real life, how many people can become butterflies!
Three arguments: Just because she is a myth and legend, why is there such a myth and legend and will spread to this day? Because this is people's true understanding of love, people think this is true love! (Applause)
Four arguments against each other: What are myths and legends? Myths and legends are out of reach. Why pursue those unattainable things? You have always stressed that people are pursuing eternity. Why are you just pursuing it? It is because it will never be realized, and now it provides you with a feasible method, so don't go into a dead end! (Applause)
Argument: Our goal is to turn the infeasible into the feasible and the beautiful wish into reality. Then another debater, when you were with your lover, did you tell him that I only care about what I once had, please don't talk to me about eternity? Then I believe your lover must have a strong psychological endurance! (Applause and laughter)
Four reasons to object: no. I will say to him, "I love you, and I know you love me." But if one day you fall in love with someone else, I have no regrets, because we really loved each other! "(warm applause)
Argument 4: If you don't love others with eternal heart, I'm afraid you won't even have the chance you once had!
Counterargument: But if you love each other with eternal thoughts, and you say "I want to stay with you all my life" every day, there is no choice, then the result will only make you heavier. But if you think that now, now, what I want to cherish is now, then I will have a lifetime! Thank you (applause)
Just now the other debater said that true love doesn't care about the length of time. So, does it really take time to test? Haven't you ever heard of "Ma Quan is far away, but people will see him over time"? The other debater just said he could have it for life. Isn't it forever?
Objection 4: but you said that love is eternal, and only when you get along with each other for a lifetime is love; We mean that as long as you have really loved, it is love, not because it is love until you are old.
Three arguments: Just now, the other debater said that as long as you look at the present, look at the present, and your present is long, it will last forever!
Objection 4: But I also know that at a certain moment, love will change because of the appearance of another person and the change of realistic conditions. So I said, I don't want to be forever.
Three affirmative arguments: Did you hear how helpless the other debater was? Does the debater want "once owned" because he can't have it forever? Our topic today is what love is, what love is, not what love must be, but what we want most in our hearts and what is the content of love? Is love based on what we once had?
Four arguments against it: but life is so helpless! The person I love doesn't love me, and the person who loves me doesn't love me.
Argument: The person you love doesn't love you, and the person who loves you doesn't love you. But love is mutual, and unilateral is not love! (Applause)
Four objections: so we don't pursue eternity. When you stop loving each other, the other person keeps saying, "You love me, you love me, and we will last forever." What's the point? (Laughter)
Argument 2: Our topic is what love is, that is, with love, we can talk about eternity. Without love, what does it have to do with "everlasting" and "once owned"? Love does come and go, but I hope the person who really loves you will not change. It is true that two people are looking for eternity. Love may be faster than you think. Maybe your tenderness can't burn a match, but your tears are not true. Of course, we hope that it will last forever, but for a hypocritical or dead love, it is no longer true love, nor is it our "everlasting".
Counterargument: Does love need time to test? One day is a flower, two days is a flower and three days is a flower. It is because you persist for a long time that you are true love!
Four arguments: How can the other debater say that love has nothing to do with time? Love takes time to test. Can you still count love if you can't stand the test of time?
Four arguments against it: if a person has never been with a person until he is old, can it be said that he has never received true love in his life? Isn't he pathetic?
Three arguments: the other debater said that short-lived love can also be love, so please give some stories or true stories that have been passed down through the ages because of short-lived love. Please quote.
Four objections: I want to say two things. First, do we love each other to be passed down to this day? I'm afraid not. We are in love, so one day I will know, "Do I love you?" Second, the love you just said has come and gone, gone and come again, until the final choice can last forever, but you will say to the last person: "I told you, I didn't love before, I only love you." Because I won't be with you until I die "
Argument 2: We say that love comes and goes, and it comes and goes because you just said that person doesn't love you. If that person loves you, why does love leave?
Counterargument: Yes, because love can't be perfect. Just like two semicircles, the radii can't be merged forever, so we say that love can't be forever!
There are no two identical leaves in the world, so how can two people think and do exactly the same? You and your lover can only blend with each other, not knead into a leaf! (Applause)
Four arguments against it: the world is changing and everyone is changing. How can you guarantee that you two will always be one?
Three arguments: the other side has always stressed that time will affect quality, but we don't think so. Does the audience think so? Is the quality bad for a long time?
Counterargument: Is it necessarily bad to have a short time? Short time is true love, long time is true love! (Laughter)
Positive argument: thank you for your recognition of our point of view! It is unrealistic for you to say "forever". Don't you just think about how many times you really paid for what you and I "once had" and then "once had" with someone when you got love?
Objection to four arguments: please listen carefully to our point of view. When we say that we care about what we once had, we don't mean that we don't care about love. It's not that I don't love you, because I am a playboy. But because of the pressure of the environment, I have to end my relationship in this case. Liang Zhu is a typical example.
Argument 2: If you really think you care about what you once had, one day your love will last forever, and you will say to your lover, "No, I only care about what I once had, so I can't last forever with you." (It's time for the square)
There are four reasons to object: what we call "once owned" is proved by evidence, which means that we can only "once owned" under realistic conditions. The other debater has never said, how can it last forever? Let me give you an example. Just like running, we mean that love is just like running, and the end point is ahead, just like everyone says "forever". But is love a kind of competition? Not to win the first place! Love is a kind of enjoyment, and the process of enjoyment is fun. I am willing to go left, and you are willing to go right. As long as we enjoy each other, we are successful. We shouldn't keep running hard for one purpose. (Applause)
Three objections: I want to reiterate our views. We also pursue true and beautiful love, but we choose a more scientific and feasible way to guide our love with a scientific view of love. I think we will get better and more perfect love.
Argument against the other side: The first question I just raised is that Marx's dialectical materialism holds that matter cannot be eternal. Matter can't be eternal, and consciousness can't be eternal. (Laughter)
Four arguments against each other: the other debater wants to pursue eternity, so if you only maintain a deteriorated love, why bother? It is better to meet a new lover, let yourself live and give each other a freedom! (Applause)
Three debates: Just now, the other debater explained that love exists with heaven and earth. So the earth has existed for 5.6 billion years, and how long has love existed? (The other party's time is up)
Our goal is to turn the infeasible into the feasible and the good wishes into reality. Then another debater, when you were with your lover, did you tell him that I only care about what I once had, please don't talk to me about eternity? Then I believe your lover must have a strong psychological endurance! (Applause and laughter)
Four reasons to object: no. I will say to him, "I love you, and I know you love me." But if one day you fall in love with someone else, I have no regrets, because we really loved each other! "(warm applause)
Argument 4: If you don't love others with eternal heart, I'm afraid you won't even have the chance you once had!
Counterargument: But if you love each other with eternal thoughts, and you say "I want to stay with you all my life" every day, there is no choice, then the result will only make you heavier. But if you think that now, now, what I want to cherish is now, then I will have a lifetime! Thank you (applause)
Just now the other debater said that true love doesn't care about the length of time. So, does it really take time to test? Haven't you ever heard of "Ma Quan is far away, but people will see him over time"? The other debater just said he could have it for life. Isn't it forever?
Objection 4: but you said that love is eternal, and only when you get along with each other for a lifetime is love; We mean that as long as you have really loved, it is love, not because it is love until you are old.
A positive statement: if you don't love others with eternal heart, I'm afraid you won't even have the opportunity you once had!
Counterargument: But if you love each other with eternal thoughts, and you say "I want to stay with you all my life" every day, there is no choice, then the result will only make you heavier. But if you think that now, now, what I want to cherish is now, then I will have a lifetime! Thank you (applause)
Just now the other debater said that true love doesn't care about the length of time. So, does it really take time to test? Haven't you ever heard of "Ma Quan is far away, but people will see him over time"? The other debater just said he could have it for life. Isn't it forever?
Love lies in eternity and also in argument;
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
After a heated free debate, I think everyone has understood who is right and who is wrong! On the issue of love, after some discussion, we have made it quite clear that "love lies in eternity". If the opponent's debater is still stubborn and enjoys "once owned", it will be a bit of a dead end.
Our first and second debates included famous sayings and sentences explaining love, timeless stories showing love, and touching people and things around us. Moreover, we have listed a large number of data, made a comprehensive comparison between middle-aged and elderly people at home and abroad, and explained that "love lies in eternity" from all aspects.
The poet Bai Hang once said: "There are two stars shining in the sky of life, one is youth and the other is love." Love is an eternal topic of human beings, and eternal love is advocated by people. Yes, true love is eternal. The ancients described love more profoundly than we do now. Only this determination to live and die together can be called true love. In contrast, what is the temporary mood of "being"?
As the saying goes, "love is urgent, but it is cold quickly." Who wants to look back many years later and touch a cold heart? " And when I look back, I am still alone, so will the sweet memories that are now considered as "once owned" be sweet? Sad memories don't add frost to your poor love science? May I ask the other debater, who wants to watch his lover help others to get old? What was your mood at that time? Do you still think that the unbearable feelings you once had are more valuable and enviable than the everlasting persistence? I think the answer is obvious!
The so-called worship of "once owned" is nothing more than a lack of self-confidence, courage to love to the extreme, and love to the old, or there is another explanation, that is "game love". Then what qualifications does this "game love" have to squeeze into the ranks of love?
Balzac once said, "Eternity is the soul of love", so love without soul is not true love. Therefore, we are here not only to discuss again and again that the soul of true love is eternal, not to let other debaters get out of deep misunderstandings, but also to let the vast number of friends present understand that we can get rid of each other's wrong ideas and stand on the side of the public and the side of truth. This is the main reason for our participation in this competition.
The eternal victory lies in reason! We believe that eternal love lies in "everlasting".
;