1. Good systems make bad people good

Examples of good systems are always talked about, and there are countless examples at home and abroad.

Chinese example: It is said that tomb robbers usually require at least two people. First, they dig a hole, and one of them goes down to get the tomb objects such as jewelry and jade, and the other person ties the objects up with a rope. But in the beginning, it often happened that the person pulling the rope became interested in the money and left behind, abandoning his accomplices. As a result, the tomb robbing business gradually evolved into a business mostly involving fathers and sons, but there were also cases where sons threw their biological father into the tomb. Finally, the experience was summed up and the rules were established: the son went down to pick up the goods, and I pulled the rope from above. Since then, no one has been thrown into a grave.

Foreign examples: At the end of the 18th century, in order to develop the barbaric Australia, the United Kingdom decided to send prisoners from the British Isles to Australia. In the beginning, money was paid according to the number of prisoners who boarded the ship. In order to make huge profits, the private ship owners who transported the prisoners used dilapidated cargo ships with simple facilities and extremely poor sanitary conditions. The death rate of prisoners was extremely high. The British government first suffered huge economic losses; on the other hand, it also had to bear the pressure brought by public opinion. So some congressmen came up with a way to pay the fee according to the number of people disembarking in Australia. The effect was immediate. In January 1793, three ships made the first voyage in which freight was paid according to the number of prisoners arriving. Only one of the 422 prisoners died on the way.

I won’t give you any examples of bad systems turning good people into bad people.

2. Organizations without organizational systems are dangerous

We will not discuss the good and evil of human nature here. A reasonable organizational system must have both authorization and supervision. I believe in your ability but also doubt your nature. But I want to use the system to stimulate the angelic side of your character, and I also use the system to deter the devilish side of you. .

If there is only authorization, no matter how good the system is, it will eventually be destroyed, because it is human nature that "people who do not serve themselves will be punished by heaven and earth"; but if there is only supervision, it will not last long, because in human nature The belief in freedom and equality is bound to explode. Only the combination of the two, the harmony of yin and yang, and the equality of rights and responsibilities can ensure the healthy development of the organizational system.

Tao follows nature and governs by doing nothing. Inaction does not mean being indifferent or doing nothing, but not acting rashly or randomly, respecting objective laws, focusing on guidance, and downplaying control. Modern system science has proven to us that the vitality of self-organization is higher than that of other organizations; the efficiency of self-management is higher than that of other management. This is because no incentive is more effective than motivating yourself, and no restraint is more reliable than restraining yourself. Just like a teacher teaching students, there are only a few who are blindly strict and can produce good students. Only by strengthening communication and understanding to promote students' self-improvement can there be many famous teachers who can produce good students.

There is a cadre who is serious and responsible in his work, upright and upright in his work. He is particularly unkind and does not allow anyone to say hello. As long as there is any violation of laws and disciplines, he will deal with it fairly. Therefore, many people were offended. These people spread unfounded rumors to slander him, and later he was assigned a sinecure. This adjustment gave him a huge blow and prompted him to reflect on his actions and realize that he should do more, make more mistakes, and offend more people. So from then on, he went to and from get off work on time, sat in the office every day, drank tea and read newspapers. As a result, the relationship between cadres and the masses and among colleagues has improved. The boss also praised him for being punctual to get off work and seemed to have changed his bad view of him.

3. What you see may not necessarily be true

Comrade Comrade Mao Zedong has a famous saying: A good system can prevent bad people from doing bad things, but a bad system can make good people become bad. We usually think that if a person falls twice in the same place, most people will laugh at him as "idiot"; if two people fall once in the same place, they will not necessarily be laughed at as two idiots. . Because according to the principle of "who is in charge, who is responsible", people's correct reaction should be to wonder: Who built a road that makes it so easy for people to fall? If only one person makes a mistake, it may be due to that person's personal fault; but if someone keeps making mistakes in the same place, there must be something wrong with this road.

If you find someone around you who is lazy at work, it does not necessarily mean that he is lazy. Although I also admit that people are lazy by nature, it may be because the current rules give others the opportunity to be lazy, or even Encourage others to be lazy; if you find someone around you who is not striving to make progress, it does not necessarily mean that he does not want to make progress. It is probably because the current incentive measures are not perfect enough; if you find that a person often works overtime until late, it does not necessarily mean that he has the ability to do well. The spirit of dedication of the company (unit) is probably due to his improper working methods and failure to complete the work in time, or even deliberately using it to earn overtime pay; if you find that a company (unit) often shirks the blame, it is not necessarily Everyone is shirking responsibility, probably because the division of responsibilities is not detailed and clear enough.

Because only a good system can give bad people a chance to become good; only a bad system can give good people a chance to become bad.