Since ancient times, everyone has agreed that opening the book is beneficial. But in today's society, is it 1% beneficial to open books?
everyone thinks books are a good thing, but they are not. Good books will enrich our knowledge, but bad books will make people confused and do something against the law. This can be said to be "tired of playing with books". If so, how can we say that opening books will be beneficial?
"Do things with people who have courage, and never read without words." This is a household word. Doesn't this sentence also say that we should acquire knowledge from life? And the knowledge gained from life is far more useful than the knowledge in books, so why don't we practice it in life?
some books will also kill your will. You are addicted to these books, you don't think about tea and rice, and you don't care about your studies. You just want to read these books. Can books be eaten as meals? Opening these volumes will also bring you "despair"
Besides, at our age, some people love reading, and reading for too long affects our eyesight. For example, Xuan Wang in our class made "friends" with glasses at an early age. < P > What a great loss! Because it may affect her life
While reading, we don't take part in any other activities and lose our sociality. We will become introverted, unwilling to talk to others, and only willing to be friends with books. This is not good for us, but it hurts us.
Some people read books, reading The Scarlet Letter today, the Hunter's Notes tomorrow and the day after tomorrow ... This not only wastes time, but also doesn't bring much benefit.
from the above points, it may not be beneficial to open books. You say, is it?
"Open book is beneficial". It has been more than 1 years since Song Taizong and Zhao Guangyi said this. For thousands of years, it has been accepted by countless people and passed down from mouth to mouth as a wise saying. Parents often teach or urge their children and elders to "study hard", thinking that as long as they study, they will gain knowledge and benefit. Therefore, people often say: "There are thousands of millet in the book", "There is a golden house in the book" and "There is Yan Ruyu in the book".
Actually, whether it is beneficial to open books depends on the quality of reading. That book is a good book, and it is beneficial to open it; And if the book is not a good book but a bad one, it is not only useless but also harmful to open it. In recent years, many good books have been published in our books and periodicals market, but many bad books have also been published. Go to bookstores, book stands and book markets, and you will find some bad books everywhere. What flatterer, what harm others, what face learning, and so on, such books that teach people to learn bad things only poison and corrode young readers, but have no benefit. As for those books that preach all kinds of negative and decadent ideas, cynicism and philosophy of life, and books that show yellow and decadent lifestyles, it is even more harmful to open books.
most people who talk about the benefits of opening books are well-intentioned. When they say that it is beneficial to open books, their original intention is to read good books. However, the current world is very complicated, and some people do sell bad books as good books to the world, especially teenagers, for a certain purpose. They also say that opening books is beneficial, but that is really harmful to readers.
Nowadays, most teenagers are highly motivated and curious, and like reading, but they often lack discrimination. In my opinion, our mass media, well-known experts and young tutors have the responsibility to remind them to read more good books, at least harmless books, and never bad books. Not all books are beneficial.
Reading is like writing. People have always advocated reading more, but in modern society, opening books is not necessarily beneficial.
Some students have no choice in reading. They are either swordsmen with swords and shadows, or love affairs before flowers and after months. What's more, they are addicted to reactionary pornographic books and periodicals that corrode their physical and mental health. When they open their books, they forget to eat and sleep, and they can't put it down. Not only do they neglect their studies, but what's more distressing is that they go astray. They can be described as "breaking thousands of books", but they can't "write like a god". Can this be said to be "beneficial to open books"?
the most important thing is that "open book" cannot be divided into good and bad. Fielding said, "Bad books, like bad friends, may betray you." Belinsky once warned us: "Bad books tell you wrong concepts, which makes ignorance more ignorant." For those "volumes" that show low-level and vulgar tastes, we must be vigilant and enhance our immunity.
From this point of view, not all books are beneficial, only reading "beneficial volumes" can be beneficial, and only then can we realize the joy of "writing like a god".