Head injury: 1
Chest and abdomen injury: 38.5
Hand injury: 32
Leg injury: 22
Penetration: 12
Cutting speed: 1.2 seconds.
firing rate: slowest
weight: less than SG552, greater than other firearms
recoil: greater than SCRE-LIGHT, AN94, SG552, less than other firearms
Second, trajectory
Generally speaking, the trajectory of this gun is still very stable.
1-3 shots, relatively stable, personally feel good head shots.
as to whether this gun is worth our choice, I personally think it is.
first of all, there is no perfect gun. Advantages and disadvantages always coexist. To put it more profoundly, it is the famous CF saying: "There are no guns with garbage, only people with garbage". We can't just use it once or twice and draw arbitrary conclusions based on our own feelings. At the very least, its greater power is a bright spot.
Secondly, this gun is very suitable for practicing techniques, and its shooting is difficult to control due to its ballistic characteristics. We might as well work hard on some shots. Many players compare him with AN94. But the overall performance of AN94 is almost abnormal. How many experts will really choose AN94?
Thirdly, the appearance of this gun should be the gospel of the civilian class. When I say "civilian", I mean two things, one is a non-RMB player, and the other is a low-level player. Corporal 1 can be bought, unlike AN94, which can only be bought by staff sergeant.
I put forward my own views on the following points
1. The theory of data falsity
A friend said that in practical application, data is not as powerful as mentioned above, and it is suspected of falsity. I think the data is objective, and there is no reason and no need to falsify it.
2, performance garbage theory
Some people say that the recoil is greater than AK, the shooting is poor, and so on. I don't know how long the person who said this used this gun. I always think that guns are "gun-like". For example, AUG is rarely used by people, but I use it well in competitions and friends I associate with. Explain what? It means that he has figured out the performance of this gun. Give an example of cycling and driving in life. I believe that everyone has ridden bicycles, and they are used to their own cars. If they are not used to riding other people's cars, does it mean that other people's cars are rubbish? And driving, too. You are used to driving in your Santana, but you are not used to driving in someone else's BMW. Does that prove that someone else's car is rubbish? In the final analysis, it is still a question of adaptation and habit.
Taking care of the beginning of the article, our pain stems from our choice. If there is no other gun, we can only use this K2, so it may be fair and objective to evaluate this gun
. Of course, what suits you is the best. Game, it's a pleasure to have one more experience.
Try one more choice.