This is wrong. Marxist philosophy is a school of philosophy, not its component. Branches of philosophy Altruism - Anti-realism - Buddhist philosophy - Confucianism - Hedonism - Materialism - Idealism - Idealism - Non-realism - Logical correctism - Pessimism - Taoist thought - Egoism - Rationalism - Realism - Aestheticism - Metaphysical materialism - Dialectical materialism - Objective idealism - Subjective idealism - Irrationalism - Stoicism - - Existentialism - Metaphysics - Utilitarianism -... As for your question, it can be understood as follows: Parts are relative to the whole. The biggest characteristic of the whole is relative independence. Ma Zhe himself is relatively independent, and philosophy is just a general name for various philosophical schools, not a whole. If this sentence is true, it is like saying that a dress is a part of a dress; or that the Yangtze River is a part of a river. ——We can see that these statements are meaningless and extremely weird, because when referring to a category of things, the name of the general term generally has an abstract meaning and does not exist in reality. However, if Isn’t it weird to use concrete things to replace abstract concepts? Let’s look at it again. If this sentence is correct, then can we say: Xiao Ming is part of their family? Then we have to ask, what is family and what is it composed of? ——So, you will find that home may include all family members, real estate such as houses, mobile assets such as RMB, living space, family culture, and even cultural programs, etc. Then, Everything becomes ridiculous. How can people get together with inanimate things? If we were in a rural area, would we still equate people with livestock? Therefore, this statement is wrong.