What is the argument method of listing famous quotes?

What is the argument method of listing famous quotes? In life, many people use famous quotes when writing articles, so using famous quotes can play a role The finishing touch is to list famous quotes as an argument method. Let me take a look at what kind of argument using famous quotes is.

What is the argumentation method of citing famous quotes 1

The argumentation method of citing famous quotes in argumentative essays

The argumentation methods are:

①Example Argument: List conclusive, sufficient, and representative examples to prove the argument;

② Logical argument: Use incisive insights from Marxist-Leninist classics, famous aphorisms from ancient and modern Chinese and foreign celebrities, and generally recognized theorems and formulas. Prove the argument;

③ Comparative argument: compare the positive and negative arguments or arguments, and prove the argument in the comparison;

④ Metaphorical argument: use things that people are familiar with as metaphors to prove the point. In addition, in refuting, the refuting method of "using your spear and attacking your shield" and "reductio ad absurdum" are often used. It is often used comprehensively in most argumentative papers.

⑤ Inductive argument, also called "factual argument". It is a method of demonstrating general conclusions by citing specific examples.

⑥Deductive argument, also called "theoretical argument", is a method of demonstrating individual cases based on general principles or conclusions. That is, using universal arguments to prove particular arguments.

⑦ Argument by analogy is a method of deducing examples of similar things from known things, that is, an argument method from special to special.

⑧Causal argument, which proves the argument by analyzing the facts and revealing the causal relationship between the argument and the argument. Causal arguments can use cause to prove effect, or effect to prove cause, or cause and effect to prove each other.

⑨ Quotation argument: A type of "principal argumentation", which uses quotes from famous people as arguments, and uses classics to analyze problems and explain the truth. There are two methods of quoting: one is explicit quoting, which means who said the quoted words or the source, and the other is implicit quoting, which does not explain who said the quoted words or their source. What is the argument method of citing famous quotes 2

The argument method of citing famous quotes in argumentative essays is called quotation argument (principal argument).

Logical argumentation is the use of reasoning methods, using incisive insights in classic works, famous quotes from ancient and modern Chinese and foreign celebrities, and recognized scientific principles, theorems, formulas, etc. to prove a point. This also includes the so-called "argument by citation" in some articles. Argument by citation is a type of theoretical argument. It uses famous quotes or opinions of famous people as arguments, and uses classics to analyze problems and explain the truth.

The purpose of rational argumentation is to prove that the argument is universal and regular. Since the argument is generally abstracted from specific materials, its essence is an inductive method, and the inductive method is difficult to be complete under many conditions. Therefore, its reliability can be guaranteed by having a theory to measure it.

Extended information

Other commonly used argumentation methods

1. Factual argumentation, also called example argumentation, is a method of argumentation from materials to viewpoints, from individual to general arguments, It is a form of reasoning that draws a consistent conclusion from the analysis and research of many individual things.

2. Comparative argumentation, argumentation method from individual to individual. It is usually divided into two categories: one is the analogy method and the other is the contrast method.

(1) Argument by analogy. An analogy argument is based on the fact that two objects are identical or similar in certain attributes, and infers that the two objects are also identical or similar in other attributes. Its logical form is: A has the attributes of a, b, c, and d, and B has the attributes of a, b, c, and d. The properties of b and c, so B may have the properties of d, which belongs to inductive reasoning in formal logic.

(2) Comparative argument. Contrastive argument is a way of thinking that seeks differences, which focuses on revealing the essence of the argument that needs to be demonstrated through the comparison of opposite or different attributes of things.

3. Metaphorical argumentation is to use metaphors as arguments, using the metaphorical person’s principles to demonstrate the metaphorical person’s (topic) principles. In metaphorical arguments, the metaphorizer is a set of image examples, which contain certain relationships and truths, while the metaphoree is an abstract truth. Although the metaphorical person and the metaphorical person are two different types of things, there is a very same general principle between them, so there is an inferential relationship between them.