Confrontation Skills and Common Sentences in Debate Competition

What skills can be mastered in debate competition and what common sentences can be used in debate competition? The following is my collection of confrontation skills and common sentences in the debate. Welcome to read. For more information, please continue to pay attention to the debate column!

Confrontation skills in the debate:

This is a hand-to-hand battle. The two sides of the debate often present a sharp state of contradiction and opposition in the fierce battle. And this antagonism is one of the important features of the fascinating debate. The characteristic of confrontation skill is that it can give tit-for-tat conclusions for the same thing.

1. Example confrontation

In the debate, choose the opposite example mentioned by the other party to confront it, thus forming a sharp confrontation. As in? Human nature is good and human nature is evil Chinese:

Zheng Fang: Please don't shy away from the question, fellow debaters. Master Zheng Yan of Taiwan Province rescued the flood in Anhui. According to your inference, isn't it dehumanizing?

the opposing side: however, the other side should pay attention to the fact that on August 28th, Lianhe Zaobao told us that tourists should be careful in these two days, because a thief with a thousand faces has appeared in Taiwan Province. (Laughter and applause)

When the Taiwan Province University team listed? Master Zheng Yan? For example, if the Fudan University team discusses whether this is dehumanizing, it will be not only difficult, but also passive. Indicates that the opposing side has chosen? A thief with a thousand faces? This opposite example effectively pushed back the other side's heckling and won this round.

2. Confrontation of famous sayings

When the other party quotes famous sayings to testify his views, it is irrational to directly refute famous sayings. At this time, the best way is to quote the opposite famous sayings to form a sharp confrontation with them. For example,

Opposing Party: As far as the function of justice and benefit is concerned, benefit is the foundation and the motive force of social development, while justice only indirectly affects social development through the adjustment of interest relations. It is in the pursuit of self-interest that human beings have entered the magnificent palace of modern civilization from the wild and wild. The French philosopher Elvis hit the nail on the head: Interest is our only motivation. ?

pro: the other debater told us something from a Frenchman, so I also want to return a quote from Rousseau, a Frenchman, who said: To love mankind, we must first love justice. ? (Applause)

The opposing team found Alvy's words from the treasure house of famous sayings from ancient and modern Chinese and foreign countries to demonstrate the idea of valuing profits. Similarly, the positive side also finds out the famous sayings with heavy meaning from this treasure house to form a sharp confrontation with it, making the debate more exciting.

We should make good use of the skills of confrontation of famous sayings in the debate, accumulate famous sayings in peacetime, and prepare famous saying cards corresponding to the opposing party's views before the debate for use.

3. historical confrontation

when the other party chooses historical facts related to the other party's views from historical classics to argue, we may as well find historical materials that are contrary to the other party's views from historical classics to form a confrontation with them. You can refer to the famous words for confrontation, which is briefly mentioned here.

4. data citation

is very simple, and numbers are a very convincing tool. I won't go into details.

5. sensational confrontation

sensational is to provoke the public by catering to their psychology through some special interests? Right and wrong? And relying on the public's emotional likes and dislikes, the illusion is told as the truth, or some problems are pushed to extremes to achieve the purpose of conquering each other. For an emotional opponent, we can sometimes arouse the public's support for ourselves and hatred for each other from another angle to form a sharp opposition. Is this called? Sensational confrontation? . As about? Is the rising divorce rate a sign of social civilization? Chinese:

Counterparty: I just want to ask you to imagine a very simple scene. When more and more children lose their sound love when they need care most, is this a sign of social civilization?

Zheng Fang: Have you noticed how many children run away from home with tears in their parents' noise? And how many children have a home that they don't want to go back, wandering outside and going astray. They do have a home, but what does such a home bring them?

Collection of Classic Sentences in Debate Contest

1. Please don't add an attribute to today's debate. Today's debate is. . . . . . Instead of. . .

2. Please don't confuse the concepts according to the logic of the opposing debater?

3. The world is so wonderful, but you are so upset, which is not good, not good.

4. In the face of such insights, the other debater has not yet awakened to the truth, just after the rain has cleared up, he still sits in the cottage and listens to the rain, unwilling to accept the light of truth.

5. Don't avoid the question, what did you say? It's not just Wan Li that is divorced from the topic we are discussing.

6. The opponent's arguer generalizes the whole. Examples to demonstrate? It's really a blind eye, blind people touch the elephant, didn't realize there was more?

7. I can't accept the idea put forward by the other party while shaking his head? Can we accept such absurd logic?

8. Why does the other debater always dare not answer our questions directly? Is he hesitating? Or can't you face so many realities at all, and always take the B result in case A to connect with the B result in case C. Isn't the other debater wrong?

9. We have repeatedly stressed from just now what will happen in case A we are discussing today, while the other debater always gives examples in case B, right? What about the paper moon as the sun?

1. No matter how flowery the language is, no matter how emotional the explanation is, it can't hide the brilliance of truth. The other debater should stop evading the question and get back to the problem at hand.

11. Please don't jump out of the topic of discussion. There is not a lack of practice in the world, but a lack of eyes to find it.

12. Has the opposing defense friend always been? Drop bombs by plane? Air to air? Let's talk about it. We asked it so many times, but they didn't give us an example. Right. 13. The opposing defense friend has never answered our questions? Carrying bamboo poles in the alley? Straight? , but beat around the bush. ;