I don’t know what Li Animation does. I only talk about the problems of the two websites from a personal perspective. It is not objective and is for reference only.
As can be seen from the data provided on the Internet about Station B, the age survey results of active users of Station B show that their ages are mainly distributed in the group born between 1995 and 2009, which is very young. And this involves several other issues.
If you use people born in 1995 (+5=2000) to check the previous ratings of the Ultraman series, you will find that even in Japan, its ratings have already had problems. In other words, starting from Eddie (80), its ratings have experienced a slight decline. Compared with the average ratings of the previous series, which first reached over 10%, the average ratings of Parvat in 1995 were around 5.11%. Half bleak.
If we take the average age from 1995 to 2009 (+5=2007), we can directly find that the average ratings of "Ultraman Seven X" launched that year were 1.6%, with the lowest being 1.1% and the highest being 2.4%. It is not an exaggeration to say that this is the worst Ultraman series ever.
Is Ultraman trash? We can’t think of it this way, but the first thing it faces is the problem of time and cultural recognition. As the "Internet (Z) Generation" group from 1995 to 2009, they eliminate old information at an alarming rate. And the Ultraman series... If you want to put it bluntly, it is just one of the manifestations of a "short-lived" monster culture craze based on Honda Inoshiro's "Godzilla" after Japan continued to experience He problems in 1954.
And its manifestation combined with the Japanese's unique delusion of persecution will form a transmission that lasts for more than sixty years. But among them, Ultraman is neither absolutely the only one, nor can he always be the best. Therefore, if we wishfully believe that, for example, the Ultraman series was first broadcast in mainland China in 1993, then (+5 = 1998), we can calculate that users from 1995 to 2009 have reason to have more Ultraman die-hard fans... ...Perhaps this is a bit empty thinking, and all kinds of related thinking are very empty.
————
Today’s Toutiao is actually not optimistic. Today’s Toutiao has large traffic, including the combination of Xigua Video and other platforms. The first thing it brings is “high fault tolerance rate” ". Each viewer only watches an article or video produced by a certain self-media once. Even if it is not the same article, it may bring more views to the creator than on other platforms.
As a platform with large traffic, its content must be richer. This is also a thinking of "high fault tolerance rate". Few people will deliberately care about the problem of a single producer. The more common ones are just disinterest or blocking. Getting more information in a shorter time (swallowing) may be what Toutiao users need. Station B is more like a circle of friends, more picky and picky.
So the question to think about here should be, as background data, does it reach a reasonable threshold when comparing the number of fans, play volume and play time, comments, etc.? The next thing that needs to be thought about should be, on such a "whale-swallowing" platform, after removing the novelty or other factors, how likely is it to improve as a producer? After all, articles or videos of the same level may become dangerous if they remain unchanged for more than a few months. You can’t refill old wine in new bottles, right?
So "dare to scold" and "swear to death" are too superficial.