Current location - Quotes Website - Famous sayings - Which is more important, thinking about debating or studying?
Which is more important, thinking about debating or studying?
Learning is more important:

1. To learn from the governor, you can only do it by learning something first.

2. Learning is the premise of thinking. Without learning, there is no thinking. Newton's success is attributed to "the giant picks apples on his shoulders", so learning is the condition for the giant to stand at your feet.

In short, learning is more important, and it is necessary to demonstrate that learning and thinking should be causal from the perspective of "it is impossible to think without learning".

In actual combat, it should be a bit like "human life can't be separated from learning, and we learned to use fire from lightning;" Learn from animals to build nests and settle down; Learn birds and soar in the sky. Another debater told me that what people are thinking now is not based on nature and space. Isn't thinking learning? Thinking is also learning! Thinking is learning from life, nature and ourselves! "

Thinking is more important:

1. It is true that thinking comes from learning, but shine on you is better than blue, and thinking comes from learning but better than learning. I don't think that learning is more important than thinking, but the other debater is stealing concepts.

2. Thinking is not learning. Some things may be available, but we can't learn them. We can only think. What is born is not necessarily learned.

In short, it is more important to lay a foundation on the basis of learning, but thinking is the key to progress. Reading thousands of books may not write a book.

The above debate sentence and the following are original ~ "Newton certainly stood on the giant's shoulder to pick apples, but there are two points. How could Newton pick apples? "Because he thinks! Why is the giant at Newton's feet a' giant'? Because it is the result of the continuous innovation of many famous scientists such as Galileo, Descartes and Kepler! "

"Of course, human beings learn from nature, but you can learn from thunder and lightning, and the other debater can learn from gorillas about relativity? Or can we learn electromagnetic induction from electric eels? Is there a crow who can recite the Analects of Confucius? Are there any dark clouds that know the origin of species? Nature contains all the knowledge known to human beings, but not all knowledge can be acquired through learning. The highly developed achievements of human civilization are more obtained through thinking! "