1. Complaining with virtue

Original sentence: "One might say: 'How about repaying evil with virtue?' The Master said: "How to repay virtue? "Repay grievance with directness, repay kindness with kindness" ——"The Analects of Confucius"

Complaining with virtue is a sentence we often hear. What does "complaining with virtue" mean that people usually understand? What? That is to say: Master Confucius taught us that if others bully you, you must endure it, and you must swallow your broken teeth. If others bully you, you should be nicer to them and use your love to influence them. He, use your heart to touch him. This makes people feel a little solemn. Think about it, if I slap the person who was beaten and still smile and say that the beating is good, the more you hit me, the more I will do. I want to treat you as best as possible... When encountering this kind of situation, I will be moved and dumbfounded. What a wonderful child, what a great sentiment...

But in fact, we have completely misunderstood Confucius's original intention. , I never expected that there was another passage behind Confucius’ sentence “complaining with virtue”. What was it? Confucius said: “How can we repay virtue by complaining with virtue? Repay vengeance with straightness and repay kindness with kindness! "After reading it, I suddenly realized that we had all been played by some Confucius FANS who quoted it out of context! What was the real situation at that time? One of Confucius' disciples asked him: Master, someone hit me, I Instead of beating him, I will be nice to him, shame him to death with my morality and education, and make him repent, okay? Confucius said, if you complain with virtue, then "How can I repay kindness?" "When others treat you with kindness, you need to repay others with kindness. But now that someone hits you, you should "complain" and throw bricks at him! Look! Just because someone deliberately ignored you With just one sentence, the fiery old Master Kong was instantly distorted into the gentle doormat image he has now.

Compared with Western culture, Eastern civilization has always been considered to be humble and stoic. When being bullied, the leader of the West, Jesus, shouted in the Bible: “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. "Little brothers! If someone stares at you, you have to stare back. If someone bites you, you have to bite him back! And what about the East? The spiritual leader of Buddhism, Sakyamuni, said, "If I don't go to hell, who will? hell? "He looked like he was submissive. And he wasn't just talking about it. The eagle came to bully him and wanted to eat his flesh, and he actually cut off the flesh from his own body for the eagle. This was so great that it was almost BT. After talking about the big leaders abroad, let’s go back to China. Why were Grandmaster Kong’s words deliberately misinterpreted by others? The root cause was the needs of the feudal rulers at that time. Their thoughts were nothing more than this. The thousands of people who believe in Confucius must become obedient people who "complain with virtue". Only people who "complain with virtue" will obey their exploitation and oppression honestly. Let's take a look at the impact. Mr. Confucius's words were criticized. The misunderstood "complaining with virtue" has played an oppressive role in the history of Chinese culture. The emperor is cruel, we must "complain with virtue", and the landlords are exploiting, we must "complain with virtue", and the Eight-Power Allied Forces are fighting. When I arrived in Beijing, I still had to "complain with virtue", grovel, cede territory and claim vassal status, do everything possible to show my "virtue", and "measure China's material resources and win the favor of the big country"... I just never thought about it. Resistance. Just imagine, if Chinese culture did not have this bad habit of twisting correct ideas from east to west to serve the feudal ruling class, and if Confucius’s original words were not deliberately misinterpreted in this way, we Chinese would develop it. Is this such a cowardly habit of thinking? Some people say that Westerners are wolf-like in nature, while Eastern people are sheep-like in nature. Ru Yueying would like to ask, what is the reason why we become like this? ? If we have believed in the Western admonition of "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth", would China in modern history have left such an impression on the world?

Complain with virtue.

Original sentence: Complaining with virtue, repaying grievance with virtue, repaying virtue with virtue. /p>

Original sentence: "Confucius said: One thrives in poetry, establishes oneself in rituals, and succeeds in music. Confucius said: The people can follow it, but they cannot know it. "——————"The Analects of Confucius·Qin Bo"

It's Mr. Kong's words again. I admire you for a moment.

The people can follow it, but they can't know it. , what does this sentence mean? It means that the state governs the people, just instructs and drives them to do things, and does not let them understand what they are doing. This sentence is absolutely obvious from the perspective of the feudal ruling class for thousands of years. We have been playing tricks on people for a long time. Why do we let the common people know so much? It is better for them to be ignorant and just follow our wishes for a lifetime. This admonishment is not evil. It has been regarded as a treasure by China's feudal rulers for thousands of years, which has obliterated so much truth and the creativity of the people. But at the same time, our question arises. Such a technique to fool the people is really Confucius, who was dedicated to educating the people. Is this the original intention of the educator?

We know that articles in the Spring and Autumn Period did not have punctuation marks. If future generations want to study the articles at that time, they have to go through a process of "sentence breaking", that is, It is to add punctuation and pauses at appropriate places in the sentence according to the context, so that you can come up with a smooth and coherent sentence.

Let me insert a sentence here, why are Confucius's articles quoted so much by later generations? This is of course due to Confucius's own fame, and the second reason is because his quotations cover a very wide range, including almost all aspects of social life. In this way, no matter who the later people are or what their purpose is, You can quote relevant parts of Confucius' words out of context, and then add your own personal interpretation and segmentation to prove your point of view. For example, the current sentence "The people can learn from it but not know it". Judging from the previous article, our Mr. Kong has been discussing three kinds of educational issues such as poetry, etiquette and music, but how come it suddenly changed to Where are the admonitions to teach emperors the power of power? It turns out that this is because later generations took the meaning out of context with ulterior motives and deliberately used an inappropriate "sentence break" in the middle of the sentence to create ambiguity in this sentence. Combining the context, we can easily come up with the correct phrasing method of this sentence: "The Master said: It is inspired by poetry, established by etiquette, and achieved by music. If the people can do it, let them follow it; if they can't, let them know it." "The whole sentence of Confucius means that the three things of poetry, etiquette, and music are the basis for educating the people. They must be done well. If the people have mastered poetry, etiquette, and music, well, let them play freely. If the people still can't play, We need to educate them about these things and let them know and understand these things. "You see, this is the original intention of Mr. Kong, the great educator who "teaches all without distinction." A good sentence was turned into a sentence by those bastards with ulterior motives. Confucius wanted to fool the people and prevent the people from learning. The art of seeking knowledge is a way of fooling the people. I really don’t know what those SBs who misinterpreted this thought. If you say that this kind of nonsense was said by the educator Confucius, who would believe it? < /p>

Some people say that the Chinese people in ancient times were unfortunate. Even in the prosperous age of material abundance, their spiritual world was pitifully poor. In the middle and modern times, the Western ideological field gradually ushered in the Renaissance. With the advent of democracy and peace, we ushered in inventions, progress and ideological enlightenment that promoted the world one after another. But what about the smart Chinese nation? They had the four great inventions earlier and were at the forefront of the world. Why is it that with such a good foundation, in modern times we are far behind the younger nations in the West? The people can follow it but cannot understand it. What a vicious admonition! It is like a big snake with its bloody mouth. It tightly entangles the Chinese nation, annihilating how many advanced thinking sparks, and shackles how many seedlings that should make a difference. But looking at it from the other side, the feudal rulers who deliberately misinterpreted this sentence are hateful, but we can completely. Putting all the blame on them? This is such a ridiculous thing in itself. Why haven't we thought about how a great educator, Confucius, who devoted his life to educating the people of the world, could say "people What is even more ridiculous is that we have believed this sentence for thousands of years and worshiped it for thousands of years. Is it Mr. Kong who should be sad in the end? Or are we?

The people can follow it, but cannot know it

Original sentence: "The Master said: One thrives in poetry, establishes oneself in rituals, and succeeds in music. If the people can do it, let them do it; if they can't do it, let them know it. "

3. If you are not poisonous, you will not be a husband.

Original sentence: A person who is petty is not a gentleman, and a person who is too generous is not a husband. ------- Couple of folk proverbs

He who is petty is not a gentleman, and he who is not poisonous is not a husband. This sentence is definitely one of the funniest examples of the many rumors spread in China. Even junior high school students who have just completed nine years of compulsory education can easily see that there is something wrong with it. First of all, being non-toxic and not a husband is a big departure from the values ????advocated by the ancients we know. A real husband naturally refers to those men who are frank and broad-minded. Can it be put in the front to describe a man?

It turns out that this proverb from the folk should be "a man who is small is not a gentleman, and a man who is too generous is not a husband". This is a very good sentence, and it is fully used in it. After the confrontation, he showed a masculine and powerful spirit, and the image of a man with a magnanimous mind appeared on the paper. It is a pity that this sentence passed down from word to mouth by the working people has reached the so-called "gentlemen" in the court. The taste in my mouth changed. Why? This starts from the habits of ancient literati. In this couplet-style proverb, "Du" is a oblique character, which makes it awkward to pronounce. In order to flatten the pronunciation of the word "toxic", those scholars who have high requirements for musical beauty had nothing to do one day, so they used their expertise to make their own decisions and changed the sentence to "no poison, no husband", so this This sentence finally became a typical example of "Trust words are not beautiful, beautiful words are not true", and became another victim of the pedantic literati's pen. Husband, one measure is worth another, it was originally a perfect sentence, but after thousands of years of misinformation, it has become the mantra on our lips now: "No poison, no husband."

I would rather believe that the entire evolution of this sentence was unintentional, otherwise it would be too immoral. Isn’t this an intentional attempt to smear our man? But even this unintentional rumor has also brought us some big rumors. It’s not a big impact. We all know that there is a saying in psychology called preconception and subtle influence.

No poison, no husband. When we are exposed to this tampered image of men every day, our inner values ????and outlook on life will inevitably be affected by some adverse effects. Every day when watching TV, the villains encourage the protagonists to do bad things. They use this sentence. : "Just do it! No poison, no husband!" Then the protagonist thought it was right, so he put his fingers together and raised his palm, making a fierce cutting motion: "No poison, no husband, do it!" Can you say the same as a man? , can you watch this thing for a long time without it having any impact on your thinking? Regarding the influence of this kind of language, let me give you another example. For example, my neighbor contradicted me. At this time, my friend Zhang San came and used the original good words to persuade me: "As the old saying goes, a small amount is not a gentleman, and a person who is too generous is not a gentleman." Husband, Da Ru, you are a man, so don’t care about him like this.” Zhang San said, of course I, a man, can’t afford to care about such trivial matters, but if it were another situation, Zhang San would be like this with me. Said: "What does this old saying say? There is no husband without poison! Da Ru, you are a man, you can't be a coward! Give you a knife and do it to him!" Look, when I heard what he said, except for the speed of taking the knife There really isn't much else to do besides rushing out and hacking to prove that you're a man, right?

4. Only women and villains are difficult to raise.

Original sentence: Only women and villains are difficult to raise. Those who are close will not have grandchildren, and those who are far away will be resentful. ——————"The Analects of Confucius·Yang Huo"

Now that feminism is on the rise, this sentence of Confucius has immediately become a perfect target for the critics of the feminist elite to attack. Look Look, this is the original origin of your Chinese men’s discrimination against us women, you old bastard Confucius! We women have been oppressed for thousands of years, thousands of years, and we have finally turned around and become the masters. We have to hold up half of the sky and then take away their half~~ sky! For a time, the crowd was furious, fierce and lively. But sisters, aunts, aunts and uncles, listen to what Ru Yueying has to say. You are putting all the blame on Mr. Kong, but you have greatly wronged him.

First of all, based on the situation of Lao Kong at that time, I raised a question: "Why did Mr. Kong say something like "Only women and villains are difficult to raise"? No one speaks out of luck. For no reason, of course, except for a madman, and our Mr. Kong should not be a madman, right? Moreover, this Mr. Kong was deeply influenced by the "Book of Songs". He said: "Three hundred poems, in one sentence, thinking about nothing." "Evil", he believed that "The Book of Songs" is a great book, and let's take a look at this masterpiece that Confucius highly praised. A large part of it praised women's liveliness, beauty, generosity and kindness, and praised the equality of men and women at that time. The atmosphere of romantic love is also true. In the Spring and Autumn Period, men and women were quite equal, and Confucius himself expressed his views on marriage many times by using the saying in the Book of Songs: "A wife is in harmony, like a drum and a harp." Therefore, saying that Confucius discriminated against women is not only inconsistent with Confucius’ thoughts, but also inconsistent with the overall environment of civil society at that time. Therefore, this statement is really open to question.

So we have to look at the circumstances under which Confucius originally said, "Only women and villains are difficult to raise." And to whom did he say this to a master? Identity, it is impossible to scold female comrades who cannot be beaten by 18 poles while thinking about it on the roadside. In "Historical Records: The Family of Confucius", it is mentioned that Confucius' previous trip to defend the country, Confucius "lived in the month of Wei" During the rest of the day, Duke Linggong and his wife were riding in the same carriage. The eunuch Yongqu came out and asked Confucius to ride second and show off in the market. Confucius said: "I have never seen anyone who loves virtue as much as he loves sex." ’ So the ugly one went to defend him. "Let me roughly translate this passage. Mr. Kong, a contemporary national education model worker, was invited by the monarch of Weiguo to visit, study and recuperate in Weiguo. However, during this period, Mr. Kong suddenly found that he had been cheated. He was simply He was just using his status to show off and promote himself. He did not really support him in coming here to educate the people of Wei. Especially the wife of Duke Ling of Wei. In order to improve his own status, he publicly showed off and belittled Confucius. The old man is so depressed, do you, Duke Ling of Wei, prefer virtue and talent, or do you prefer women? Which one is more important to you, me or your wife? After finishing the meal, Confucius was angry. , said: "I have never seen anyone who loves virtue as much as he loves sex! leave! I don’t want to leave you here, I have my own place to stay! GO, GO, GO! "I packed my luggage and left Weiguo. After leaving, my mood calmed down. I thought of the bad things about Weiguogong's wife who relied on being favored, was arrogant and domineering, disrupted the government and disturbed the people, and sighed: "Only women and villains are difficult to raise. also! If you are close, you will not appreciate it; if you are far, you will be resentful. ”

You see, knowing these historical background and life experiences, it is easy to understand what Confucius said. We know that the people he scolded were the kind of “raised” women and villains. Women It's okay, but think about who can raise a villain? Look at Confucius's journey to defend the country, and everything becomes clear. He is definitely not crazy and suddenly scolding all women, including his mother. , but there is a specific object to refer to. This object is Wei Linggong's wife Nanzi, one of those palace women who "don't have grandchildren when they are close, and resentment when they are far away." Resentment, how do you explain the last sentence? That is to say, if you, as a monarch, are too close to the women in the harem and the flatterers who have no ability, they will get carried away, forget their identity, and start to use your power for mischief. If you do something wrong and you alienate them, they will complain. In short, it will be very troublesome.

It is understandable that Confucius, who had never seen any fights between women in the court before, said this, and his worries were not unreasonable. Before Confucius, Daji harmed the country and played tricks on the princes. Are there many examples of these? After Confucius, eunuchs were in power, and the queen's relatives disrupted the government many times and countless times. So our female compatriots, you should know clearly that Confucius didn't have the nerve to curse all the women in the world indiscriminately. Don't torture him anymore~~

The last question, then Who misrepresented this sentence and allowed our lovely female compatriots to be oppressed for thousands of years? As the saying goes, every grievance has its owner, and every debt has its owner. If Ru Yueying wants to rehabilitate Master Kong, she will naturally help you find a real culprit so that you can vent the resentment accumulated over thousands of years. It’s a ghost movie -_-!), okay, let’s get back to the topic. During the Western Han Dynasty, there was a so-called “great scholar” Dong Zhongshu. This man strongly advocated that “the husband is the guide for the wife.” It was this guy who borrowed a sentence from Confucius out of context, It has put thousands of years of yoke on the heads of the vast number of Chinese women. Look at the "three cardinal principles" proposed by this guy in the book "Jiyi": "The righteousness of the monarch, minister, father, son, and husband are all related to the yin and yang. The monarch is yang, the minister is yin; the father is yang, the son is yin; the husband is yang. It is Yang, and the wife is Yin. The three principles of kingship can be sought from heaven. "This thing of his is just a flattery to please previous rulers. "The king is the guide for his ministers" was accepted by emperors of all dynasties and gradually formed a set of principles of feudal rule, while "the husband is the guide for his wife" was respected by men of all ages. What does "outline" mean? If the king is the guide for his ministers, then if the king wants his ministers to die, the ministers will have to die! Do you know how powerful this "gang" is? Think about it, all the poor women who were lovely and graceful before they got married have equal status, but once they get married, they have to live their lives in fear of their husbands. These three principles and five permanent principles have restricted China for many years. , how many generations have been harmed!

5. My life has a limit, but my knowledge has no limit.

Original sentence: My life also has a limit, but my knowledge has no limit. If I have a limit, I will follow the limitless, and I am almost dead——————"Zhuangzi·Health Preserver"

This sentence It's what Zhuangzi said. Let's talk about it. Zhuangzi is actually a person that I like very much. His thoughts and temperament are very, very, very special to my liking. Why don't you like to hear this? Forget it, I originally wanted to give you some exciting information to let everyone know more about me, a good comrade... Okay, don't throw eggs, can't I just say it's business? Okay, let’s take a look first. “My life has a limit, but my knowledge has no limit.” Where do we see this sentence most? First, it is the library, and second, it is on the back wall of every primary school across the country. According to people’s current common understanding, this sentence is really an inspirational aphorism for learning. Life has limits, and knowledge has no limits. How noble. Goal, this is much more powerful than Confucius's "Learning and practicing with pleasure". Throughout the ages, countless students have been inspired by this sentence to cut through walls and listen to the chickens dancing. They work hard and pursue advancement. Those books that can never be read, motivation, idols, Zhuangzi can still say such inspiring words when he is seventy or eighty years old. How can we, the young generation, lose to him when we are still young? How can he live up to his old man if he doesn't study hard?

But telling the truth often makes people dumbfounded. Zhuangzi actually said this, "My life has a limit, but my knowledge has no limit. If I have a limit, I will die without a limit." My Zhuangzi life is limited, but the knowledge I face is infinite. If you want me to use my limited life to pursue the end that I can never see, do you think I am SB? This will kill you~~ Zhuangzi is a free and easy person who pursues letting nature take its course and being pure and inactive. He believes that people only need to eat to be full. There is no need to pursue luxury. Just wear clothes and don't freeze. In fact, No need to compare with anyone. The same is true for knowledge. Just learn enough and put it to use. Knowledge is learned just to use it. No matter how awesome you are, can you still use all the knowledge in the world? Since you can't use it, then why are you spending your whole life learning it? You have spent all your time studying, so how can you have time to use what you have learned? Isn’t this just like someone who eats to show off and dresses to compare with others? Isn’t this completely putting the cart before the horse? Therefore, in his book "The Health Preserver", he warned the nerds who would fall into this vicious circle in the future generations. If you study hard and blindly and study indiscriminately, it will not be good for your health, and you will kill yourself~~

Of course, Zhuangzi’s misunderstood words are not as negative as the above examples. Reading is necessary, and mastering certain knowledge is also necessary, but we must remember to grasp it well and have Personality. Even if you spend half your life arming yourself with a lot of knowledge, you will find that you have no use for a lot of knowledge. Isn't this a waste? Zhuangzi never believed that a person can be greater than nature. This is the only theme in all his words. In fact, even if we use the current world view to measure a "Zhuangzi", we can still find that there are some in his doctrines. Many are in line with the thinking of dialectical materialism.

What is regrettable is that for such a thinker who advocates nature, his words to persuade readers to stop when enough is enough and proceed step by step were used by some people who shouted "Man can conquer nature" as a famous saying to encourage young people to study hard. The imperial examination was changed to the college entrance examination. Eight-legged essay writing was changed to exam-oriented education, so the number of college students increased year by year, but their quality became lower and lower year by year. In the end, they became pornographic, right? You see, college diplomas are no different than waste paper now. These people haven't woken up yet, so they still continue to study. After college, they will study for a master's degree, after finishing a master's degree, they will study for a Ph.D., after finishing their Ph.D., they will study for a postdoc... Take a look after reading, hey , it seems that I am already old and don’t need to worry about a lot of knowledge. Isn’t this something that I can’t live with myself? Finally, a personal complaint. When I went to the library recently, I always saw a bunch of old men and women waiting there every day. Whenever there were any free classes, they jumped in and didn’t care what other teachers were teaching. Grandpas and grandmas, listen to what I, a junior, have to say, aren’t you making trouble? Following the fashion? Show off your personality? Do you want us to praise you? Or do you really plan to live and learn? Is there any point in thinking about it for yourself? Can some space be made available for people who really need it? Even "A Brief Talk on the Fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics" has an old lady from the street occupying a seat in it. I am really speechless...

6. Helping each other

Original sentence: It is better to help each other than to talk to each other. Forgotten in the Jianghu——————"Zhuangzi·The Great Master"

Following the footsteps of the great thinker Mr. Zhuang, let's take a look at another famous saying that we are all familiar with: "Let each other help each other." Speaking of this sentence, it actually has a lot of origins. I think everyone has heard of this popular word now, right? Jianghu, where did this "jianghu" come from? Many people think that it was originally a sentence in Gu Long's novel "People are in rivers and lakes, and they can't help themselves". In fact, this is not the case. The earliest source of the word "jianghu" is in Zhuangzi's sentence "We can help each other through trouble". In the chapter "The Great Master", Zhuangzi tells us such a short story: "The spring dries up, the fish and the fish are on the land. They are wet with each other, and they are wet with foam. It is better to forget each other in the rivers and lakes." What he is talking about is that one day, at a glance, The spring water dried up and two small fish were trapped in a small puddle. In order to survive, they blew bubbles from each other's mouths and used their own moisture to moisten each other's bodies, supporting each other and relying on each other. However, instead of supporting each other on the verge of death, it is better for everyone to find a waterway and happily return to the vast rivers and lakes, return to their respective worlds, forget each other, and be free.

This is how the "jianghu" we keep talking about comes from, didn't you expect it? This is a small advertisement. Welcome to read and comment on my humble novel: The novel "Book of Rivers and Lakes" is not a particularly awesome book. The protagonist is just a little bit more awesome than Zorro. We are currently contacting the publisher and may release it soon. You can also search for it first. ~~ Well, well, come back and help each other, what a beautiful scene, although this is not the most ideal state of love. No matter how uneducated the old lady in the neighborhood committee was at that time, she would definitely say this sentence. In the era of our parents' generation, when marriages were arranged through organizations, this sentence supported many couples with different personalities but little emotional foundation. Until today, we have been supporting each other, what a good role model, but I never thought about it back then, I just didn’t know at that time, since we need to support each other to support, why don’t we just let go freely and let go of ourselves and each other to find each other? For happiness, how about finding their respective worlds?

How many people know the full meaning of this sentence?

I have a college classmate, a girl from Shaanxi. She found a boyfriend from Shaanxi when she was in school. She gave everything to him, including her body, of course, but that lazy girl Her boyfriend was very bad to her. He often beat her and scolded her and ordered her around like a servant, but he couldn't leave her at all. What surprised us was that she endured it silently for four years. We I couldn't help but ask her, why are you still together when your life is so hard and uncomfortable? But she answered like this: "If you marry a chicken, follow the chicken, if you marry a dog, follow the dog. Although we are not very happy together, isn't this just mutual support?"

I am speechless, can this be considered mutual support? Why do you want to tie both parties together and continue to live unhappily even though there is a bigger world and a broader world outside? Why do you want to tie both parties together even though you know that you have a better future? We all live in a society where traditional thinking occupies a very strong position. I don’t know how many loves have become victims of this traditional thinking. In fact, think about it, if you are not happy yourself, what will the praise of others do? If you can find your own true world, what will happen to others' accusations? Alas, to put it bluntly, it’s a bit meaningless. My parents also taught me the principle of urging union but not separation. Let’s stop this topic. It turns out that I am not immune to the common practice of urging union but not separation. Just a sigh, we never thought that apart from a word of mutual affection, it turns out that we can still forget each other in the world.

7: The heaven and the earth are unkind, and treat all things as straw dogs

Original sentence: The heaven and earth are unkind, and treat all things as straw dogs; the saints are unkind, and regard the common people as straw dogs - "Tao Te Ching" ”

Speaking of this sentence, most angry youths will tell you that it means: “The world is cruel and unkind, treating everything as lowly pigs and dogs, and those so-called high-ranking people are cruel and unkind. The saints are no different, and they treat us ordinary people as inferior to pigs and dogs!" A standard anarchist declaration, a standard dissatisfaction with society. This sentence can be seen everywhere in various articles written by angry youths and in the current third-rate online YY novels. The protagonist is usually weak and helpless, suffering from oppression and injustice, so one day he suddenly wakes up and shouts "Heaven and earth are unkind." , Treating all things as stupid dogs! "In an instant, he may attain enlightenment and soar, or become a Buddha physically, or turn from a weakling that everyone can bully into a overlord, and so on...

< p>Basically, the thinking of these children can be summarized as an explosion of oppression that has been depressed for too long, as if even God owes them a hundred and eighty thousand. But what? On the other hand, these anarchist guys didn't have the guts to shout something more awesome like "Princes and generals should rather have the guts", and they didn't even dare to raise a big flag and shout "Heaven is dead and Huang Tiandang will stand." !” In the end, I had to shout this sentence: “Heaven and earth are unkind, treating all things as stupid dogs” to express the aggrievedness of being treated unfairly. To be honest, I actually sympathize with these people. Anarchism is nothing special. A person who has not experienced the anarchist stage in his student days can basically be considered to have no youth. I have also experienced that kind of thinking that is particularly impulsive and feels like this. This is a time when no one in the world can live with themselves. The difference is that now I know that blaming others is useless. Society is unfair. Society is just so unfair. If you feel that society is unfair, you can only work hard to change it all. . But even though I understand their youth very well, I still need to say something to these younger generations. In fact, you are using the wrong sentence.

The heaven and the earth are unkind and treat all things as pigs and dogs. This is not what you understand literally. To say that the heaven and the earth are cruel and unkind and regard everything in the world as pigs and dogs is also to say that the saints are unkind and regard the common people as pigs and dogs. It is not at all like you think that the so-called superior rulers regard the people as lowly and humble. In fact, the real meaning of this sentence is that the heaven and earth are not emotional and treat all things equally, while the saints are not emotional and treat the common people equally.

The sentence you admire does not contain the oppression and discrimination you need in its original meaning. On the contrary, it speaks of a fair truth. All of us and all sentient beings are equal in the eyes of heaven and earth. Yes, why are you gnawing dry bread now while others are eating seafood dinner? Child, before you scream unfair, why don't you think about whether you have shed the same sweat as him? If you can't figure it out, that's fine, then don't think about it. Why don't you try to reverse this "injustice" a little through your own efforts? Is it useful to just scream about injustice, scream about the lack of justice, and wait for a pie to fall from the sky to compensate for your grievances and regrets and the youth you are losing that will never be returned?