As a teacher, the report I am most afraid of listening to is the report on teachers' morality. Because every time after listening to the report, there is no pride, only sadness. Sorry for the "excellent teachers" on the stage! More sad for our group! Their tearful report can be summed up in one sentence, that is, "if you have a home, you will not come back, if you are sick, you will disappear, and if you have children, you will have no parents." We can't help asking: Is this the way teachers work, their living conditions and the direction of professional development that we want to advocate? First of all, say "don't go home" They all take school as their home, get up early and get greedy, forget all about eating and sleeping, stay at school day and night, and have little time for themselves. Leave home before dawn and forget to make breakfast for the children; When I got home tired in the middle of the night, the child fell asleep while waiting. In short, I always look at the stars but not the sun when I go to work every day. In a word, it is "get up earlier than the chicken and go to bed later than the prostitute". And some teachers who do better even live on campus all the year round and don't go home. Busy on weekdays, I have to make up lessons for students on holidays.
It is commendable to concentrate on work, but without a normal life, it is difficult for people to feel that this is a lifestyle worthy of promotion and praise. Don't we work hard to create a better life, but just to prove the sublimity and greatness of education? In fact, no matter where we stand, it is easy for us to find that life and work are essential for anyone, and neither can be neglected. But why can we take this problem for granted or even taken for granted when it comes to teachers?
As a profession, teachers should not only meet the norms and requirements of modern education, but also pursue high quality and high efficiency. If we can't finish the work within the eight-hour working time stipulated by the state, it is necessary for us to investigate the reasons: if it is correct to emphasize work efficiency, why don't these excellent teachers follow the trend of the times? If educating students can't be done overnight, why are so many teachers still working hard in the middle of the night? What's wrong with it?
Secondly, talk about "not seeing if you are sick". Most of the excellent teachers and teachers' ethics we promote are in poor health, suffering from various diseases, especially lumbar vertebrae, cervical vertebrae, pharyngitis and other occupational diseases, but they have not been treated in time for a long time, and they walk around the school with disabled bodies every day.
Apart from the effect of working in spite of illness, this behavior alone is unacceptable. Health is the capital of work, and it is undoubtedly the practice of killing the goose that lays the golden eggs to achieve career success by overdrawing health. This degree of professionalism is admirable, but it should not be an example for teachers to follow and learn. The purpose of training teachers in our society is to make them make a long-term contribution to their education posts, rather than to let them gallop on the expressway in their prime. We often talk about the sustainable development of the national economy. Should we also pay attention to the sustainable utilization of teacher resources? It is everyone's right to rest when he is sick. In the ideal and reality, teachers should first choose to live. Only by living well can the flowers of ideals bloom everywhere. A teacher who doesn't even cherish his own body and life is not worthy to be a teacher of peace talks education. Because education is more about letting our children learn to survive and cherish life.
Human life belongs not only to oneself, but also to family, collective and society. Overdrawing or even wasting one's life in pursuit of temporary success is a manifestation of mental disability and a great irresponsibility to oneself, the family, the collective and the society. We call them "model teachers' morality". I really don't know what we want. In our publicity, we neglected that a healthy teacher can create more value! Can make greater contributions! More importantly, it has important practical significance for the survival education and life education of the next generation! I really don't want to hear again: the teacher stands tragically on the sacred platform, dragging his tired body that has long been sick, but only serves as a lofty example for students to learn with tears.
Third, Kan Kan "with or without children". Some are pregnant but have to have an abortion; Some children are lively and lovely, but they can only be kept at home, almost like orphans. It is a sin for them to have children.
Zhang Lijun's article "Every flower has a reason to bloom" was published in Shenzhen Youth, which made people deeply moved: watching the story report of "Top Ten Teachers" on TV, tears stung their eyes. Among them, a female teacher surnamed Fang told a true story that happened to her. Teacher Fang's husband works in other places. They have a four-year-old daughter. Teacher Fang teaches math in Grade Three and is also the head teacher of a class. In the early summer of this year, review entered a white-hot stage. Teacher Fang arrives at school before 6 o'clock every morning and can't go home until after 10 in the evening. Children in kindergarten go to school with their mothers every day? Because the cave is too early, the kindergarten has not opened yet? Snow will be sent to kindergarten by her mother after her mother has settled down in class. At 7 o'clock in the evening, the mother took the child home from the kindergarten, unplugged all the electrical plugs, piled the toys in front of her daughter, locked the door and went to school to tutor the evening self-study. One day, teacher Fang's grade will have a mock exam. Early in the morning, my daughter said that she was "very cold". Teacher Fang touched his forehead and felt a little hot, but he didn't care. In the evening, she took her daughter home, and her daughter said that she was "very sleepy". Teacher Fang let her daughter sleep and hurried to the school to help her study at night. The next day, the child said that he didn't have the strength to get up and asked not to go to kindergarten. He stayed at home all day. Mom also agreed. On the third day, the child said that his eyes were out of sight. At this time, his mother's mock exam had just ended, and he took the children to the hospital to see a doctor. As a result, the doctor said that the child was completely blind because of high fever and corneal softening and perforation ... Teacher Fang couldn't help crying at this point. But she calmed down and immediately added: "The students in that class lived up to expectations, and half of them were admitted to key high schools. Although I paid a high price for their success, I think it is worth it! Their success is the comfort and pride of my life! " ..... When I saw this real case, I didn't feel a trace of pride at that moment, but out of anger. The great teacher thought ridiculously that sending away a few excellent students could offset her crime against an innocent girl. Behind her dazzling aura is an almost heartless daughter image. She took the poor girl as her private property and sacrificed her children to show a teacher's incomparable noble sentiment as a mother; She created a "burden" for society for no reason on the grounds of work stress, but she naively used such behavior to show off. Sad! Sad!
Now there is a famous saying that misleads teachers, which is particularly popular, that is, "Children who love themselves are human beings, and children who love others are gods". I don't know where this sentence comes from. But I am puzzled, why do you say "people love their children, and God loves other people's children"? Why must children who love themselves be opposed to children who love others? They are all children, why can't they be treated uniformly? Furthermore, why should teachers be required to be "gods"? Let's reflect, if a teacher can't even get in touch with "people" who are physically and mentally healthy, how can he talk about "God"? In fact, I prefer to change this sentence to: "children who don't love others have low morality;" If you don't love your children, animals are worse than animals. "Because all animals know that they love their children, they have the responsibility to give birth to them. So, from this perspective, is not loving children worse than animals? Since you have a child, you should support him and love him, or you should not have children! A truly excellent educator should first set up the concept of "let other people's children become their own children" and "raise children for the country" and strive to cultivate every child (including his own, of course). Nothing should be a reason for a teacher to ruin a child's health, life and future. Finally, say, "Parents don't want it. "They disregard their families for work." Some in-laws are sick in bed, but they can't serve around; Some fathers died of illness, but they couldn't go back to see them for the last time. "What do we want to promote through the stories of these teachers that make people cry? Show off what?
It is undoubtedly a wonderful irony to recall these teachers, who are praised as moral models, telling students to love their parents on the podium, but ignoring the safety of their loved ones. Our education has given ourselves a loud slap in the face! It seems that our teacher is acting instead of teaching. Is the teacher's job so important that no one can replace it? They can only watch their loved ones struggling in pain, but they can't shed a tear of regret in front of the hospital bed. After losing a happy family life, it is hard for me to imagine that teachers can still be proud of what they have done. Are we advocating morality or cruelty? Even the most basic human nature is gone, will the moral building still stand? A person who doesn't even love his parents, can you expect him to love students, the collective, the country from the bottom of his heart, without selfishness? ..... The more I think about it, the more confused I get. Who is leading our teachers into this inhuman and abnormal moral minefield?
Suddenly I remembered the poor girl before. * Women should make up to solicit customers, and flatter customers with a full face of joy, while teachers abuse their physical and mental health, family, affection, please the leaders, please the people and please the society in a self-harming way. After so many years of reform and opening up, why do the requirements for teachers still stay in the planned economy era 30 or 40 years ago? Why do teachers have to sacrifice things that everyone doesn't want to lose, such as health, family and affection, in order to be recognized by superiors, society and the public? This is undoubtedly asking our teacher to roll the minefield with his body! Instead of deluding ourselves with idealized standards to criticize teachers for not reaching their due moral heights, it is better to pull teachers down from the illusory altar and restore these overwhelmed gardeners to their true colors. I sincerely hope that the authoritative departments at all levels can stand at a more rational and objective height when they re-select the model of teachers' morality. I hope we can hear more speeches from our excellent teachers on how to do a good job in professional development scientifically in the next report on teachers' morality; How to live a healthy life; How to have Zhang's efficient work; How to achieve other people's children, but also to achieve their own children; How to honor our parents and create a happy family … then we will be proud of our profession from the heart!