Criticism and education remind us to be practical, and the first line of defense cannot fall into "four forms". The first thing to emphasize is that "it is normal to bite your ear and pull your sleeves and sweat your face", move the supervision and discipline barrier forward, make good use of criticism and education reminders, and hold the first line of defense of discipline. Based on the height of supervision and discipline, it embodies the seriousness of educational reminder. Discipline inspection and supervision organs to carry out criticism and education reminders are not private conversations between cadres, but organizational serious systems and procedures. Before talking, the interviewee must be clearly informed of the existing problems, so that they can take the initiative to realize the risks and correct their mistakes. All conversations should be recorded, loaded into the cadres' personal integrity files, and recorded for future reference, so that the interviewees can really be warned, educated and stopped. Highlight the policy of saving education and improve the effectiveness of educational reminders. How to talk about educational reminders, what to talk about and who to talk about often determines the actual effect of educational reminders. Discipline inspection and supervision organs should formulate the contents and procedures of the conversation according to the specific conditions of different objects before carrying out the education reminder conversation. In order to achieve the best effect of education reminder, we should also pay attention to the personality characteristics and behavior of the interviewee, choose the appropriate conversation object and conversation environment, insist on caring for, caring for and helping party member cadres as the starting point of our work, and embody the unity of content, form and effect of education reminder. Clarify the specific implementation procedures and form the institutionalization of educational reminders. Discipline inspection and supervision organs at all levels should take the organization of criticism and education reminders as a regular work arrangement for supervision and discipline, establish an education interview reminder management system, clarify the objects and specific problems of criticism and education reminders, organize and implement them at different levels according to the requirements of supervision and discipline accountability and first-level implementation, highlight party member cadres who have reported discussion, signs and tendencies in their work and life, and realize full coverage of interview reminders in advance. For the top leaders of the Party and government, the secretary of the Discipline Inspection Commission should personally interview and remind other party member cadres to interview at different levels. At present, corruption is more complicated and hidden, especially the "four winds" problem, which is the root of derivative corruption, is still outstanding, and some disciplinary problems have been transferred to more hidden areas. We should keep our eyes open and ears open, find it in time and deal with it as soon as possible. Be good at using information from various sources and never let go of any clues. Supervision and discipline cannot be relaxed at all. While continuing to play the role of letters and visits as the "main channel" for finding problems, we should further play the role of organization and coordination, strengthen cooperation with judicial, auditing, administrative law enforcement and other relevant departments, and strive to improve the ability to find problems by using working resources. In addition, it is necessary to enhance the sensitivity and predictability of the work, actively pay attention to and use public opinion information such as the Internet and the media, firmly grasp the clues of problems, and make careful judgments. Focus on areas prone to disciplinary problems and conduct directional scanning. Disciplinary problems are not actively exposed, and actively discovering problems will become the normal work of discipline inspection and supervision organs at all levels in the future. Discipline inspection and supervision organs at all levels should be good at analyzing the general laws of disciplinary problems, identify the departments and posts where disciplinary problems are prone to occur frequently, and make full use of local inspection and supervision, special supervision and inspection, unannounced visits by party style and political style supervisors, and strive to find problems. To improve the clue management and disposal mechanism, we should pay attention to analysis and judgment. Discipline inspection and supervision organs at all levels should strictly regulate the handling of problem clues, and implement centralized management, collective judgment and classified disposal of problem clues in their own regions, departments and units. Whether it is a case or a typical one, we should carefully analyze them one by one to prevent the loss of valuable clues. Priority should be given to the clues found in inspection, supervision and special inspection. We should regularly sort out and analyze the problems of letters and visits that the masses have highlighted and repeatedly reported. When problems with universal symptoms are found, they should be reported to the Party Committee in time, and further measures should be taken to check and correct them in time. Grasp the early and small to carry out disciplinary review, and grasp the "four forms" of supervision and discipline before the law. Specifically, in the discipline review work, it is to deepen the "three changes", strengthen the early grasp of the small, and effectively put the discipline and rules ahead. Strict standards, a yardstick of good discipline. We should profoundly understand the spirit of the newly revised Regulations on Honesty and Self-discipline of the Party of China and the Regulations on Disciplinary Actions of the Party of China, further change the way of thinking, firmly establish the concept of supervision and discipline before the law, and measure the behavior of party member cadres with a disciplinary ruler. We should not only pay attention to the discipline of party member cadres in the process of performing their duties, but also further compare political discipline, organizational discipline, honesty discipline, mass discipline and work discipline. Flexible discipline, enhance the comprehensive effect of discipline review. Putting discipline and rules ahead is not limited to investigating major cases, but more importantly, we should shift our focus to the implementation of party discipline with a zero tolerance attitude. Efforts should be made to find out the main facts of violation of discipline, so as to find out the facts quickly and improve the efficiency of disciplinary review. According to the degree of party member's violation of discipline and his attitude of correcting mistakes, we should pay attention to the flexible use of disciplinary measures and organizational treatment methods, and strive to achieve the comprehensive effect of punishment, education and shock. Party member cadres who violate discipline and make minor mistakes should be good at using and using organizational means to criticize and remind them in time; Those who have a good attitude and a strong sense of error correction can be given a lighter or no punishment and try their best to give cadres a chance to turn over a new leaf. Change the concept and method of subject trial and highlight the characteristics of the subject. Starting from four aspects: audit content, trial rhythm, trial documents and punishment execution, in the aspect of fact finding, the focus is on violation of discipline; In terms of evidence requirements, treat violations of discipline and illegality differently; In terms of the number and amount of mistakes, we should not unilaterally pursue the size of the audit amount and the level of handling cases; On the scale of discipline, it is moderately strict. When dealing with criminal cases investigated first, "punishment before action" is implemented. General cases are given disciplinary sanctions before or at the same time as the transfer, and a few suspected cases are given disciplinary sanctions before the judgment of the first instance. Investigation and accountability should be true. The "four forms" of supervision and discipline are based on the comprehensive and strict administration of the Party "two responsibility". It is an important measure to promote the implementation of two responsibility through accountability and accountability. It should be implemented simultaneously with the disciplinary review. In the process of investigating and handling cases of violation of discipline, the discipline inspection and supervision organs should not only find out the problems of the violator himself, but also find out the implementation of the "two responsibility" of the Party Committee and Discipline Inspection Commission of the unit where the violator belongs, as the content of disciplinary review. At the same time, when making an investigation report, put forward opinions on whether to investigate the relevant leaders, and truly integrate the "double investigation of one case" into the disciplinary review procedure. It is necessary to highlight the members of the leadership team. Practice shows that it is often not as good as the deterrent effect of the educational warning formed by the accountability of relevant leading cadres to investigate and deal with a case of cadres violating discipline in party member. In particular, the accountability of leading cadres can often fundamentally change the current situation of building a clean government in a department or unit, and it is twice the result with half the effort for the formation of "four forms". Poke the pain point that touches the nerve. Accountability is also a serious political discipline. The implementation process should be planned, procedural and gradual, and should not be underestimated. No matter what kind of treatment is given, it should be made public within a certain range, and the actual effect of accountability should be enhanced by means of assessment, rewards and punishments, organization and disciplinary action. Leading cadres who have seriously neglected their work style and clean government will be held accountable and disciplined.