What is Darwin’s “theory of evolution”? Why are only politicians so excited about it, but no real scientist cares about it?
Who would call Darwin’s “natural selection” If "biology" is used to promote the hypothesis of infinite random "evolution", victory of the fittest, survival of the fittest, survival of the fittest? If used as "biology", which pests and beasts are far away if it is really "natural selection, survival of the fittest" If they are more adapted to survival than humans, then the earth will be full of harmful insects, poisonous snakes, and ferocious beasts. Because they are the "strongest and fittest" who can survive in any environment. There are even carnivores among plants, and many extremely low-level insects and beasts use chemicals to kill people. "Survival of the fittest" leaves people with nowhere to go. Can be hidden. Then humans are just the unfit and can no longer exist on the earth. Are there still humans in the world?
Science has discovered that only one sperm among the 300 million sperm in humans can enter the egg, and no other sperm is allowed to enter. If Darwin's hypothesis of random "natural evolution" without purpose is truly scientific, then at least 100 million sperm could be randomly "naturally selected" into the egg.
No one in the coyote population has ever guided them, mobilized and convinced them: "Inbreeding is very harmful." Scientists have been tracking and studying for more than 10 years and have confirmed that the animal kingdom without moral constraints can actually prevent incest on its own. The impetus is there, and science has been unable to solve the mystery. Is it idealism? Can it be explained by "evolution"?
The error of the calendar we use now is 0.0003 days per year, while the Mayan error is 0.0002 days per year. The error used by the Mayans thousands of years ago The calendar was more accurate than the calendars we use today. Is there a principle of "evolution" from low-level to high-level?
As we all know, the written history of mankind is only 2,000 years ago, but humans 7,000 years ago built the Egyptian pyramids. It is only 4,600 years ago that humans knew how to put on clothes. However, exquisite bronze artifacts from 11,000 years ago were discovered on the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean. In addition, iron nails from 20,000 years ago, murals from 30,000 years ago, and traces of bullets piercing the bones of cattle and sheep from 40,000 years ago have also been discovered and confirmed around the world.
Atomic energy technology is a cutting-edge technology that humans have only mastered in recent decades, and a 2 billion-year-old nuclear reactor was surprisingly discovered at the Oklo uranium mine in Gabon, Africa.
These are things and technologies that primitive humans could not create, and some of them have not been achieved or manufactured by modern humans. But these things are actually before us. They not only stun modern people, but also expose the history of human development established by modern people and Darwin's apes turning into humans. Can the defenders of Darwinism respond?
It’s very simple. Sports enthusiasts like to buy sports equipment, and musicians like to buy musical instruments. If it is biology, biologists should first accept it. If it is science, it will be promoted in the way of the scientific community, which emphasizes the verification of evidence, and finally agrees before it can be made public. But with political implementation, things are simple, and evidence doesn't matter.
In 1831, Darwin was a devout Christian who had just graduated from the Divinity School of Cambridge University. Captain Fitzroy happened to need a man to keep him company. Recommended by his mentor J.S. Henslow, the 26-year-old Darwin gentleman joined the British Navy's sailing ship "Beagle" on its South American voyage in December of the same year as an "accompany" and stayed at the captain's table for a five-year circumnavigation of the world. Having the opportunity to collect biological specimens, he began his dream of unpaid sailing expeditions as an amateur naturalist. Later, he was honored to be elected as a member of the Royal Society. The conditions made it very clear to Darwin that fame and a family were just around the corner. Coupled with the strong support of a group of friends such as Huxley who also wanted to be new and famous. At that time, it was also the period of the Dark Papal Period, which was aroused by the European religious circles; Daniel Chapter 12, Verse 7 of the Bible:... "It will take a time, two times, and half a time to break the power of the saints, and all these things will come to an end." All came true.
"These three and a half years, that is, 1260, refer to the prophecy of the dark papal rule of 1260 from AD 538 to 1798 in the Middle Ages; under the corrupt and authoritarian Catholic centralized system; the Inquisition began to operate in southern France, and it only arrived in 1823. Between 1846, 200,000 people in the papal states were sentenced to death, life imprisonment, exile or hard labor, and another 1.5 million people were under surveillance and review among this group of political and imperial ambitions disguised as religion. Under his leadership, the true "love" and "goodness" in God's Bible were completely discredited in people's eyes. In early December 1520, German Christian Martin Luther and other religious reform leaders finally became pure after many hardships. In an era when the Christian faith had just been rescued from the corrupt and authoritarian Catholic power, the reputation of Christ was still recovering, and the "foundation" was still shaking, it was known that people in many countries around the world were worried and worried, and many countries appeared in it. The semi-colonial and semi-feudal Chinese society, which is polytheistic and has always worshiped the monotheistic "Tao of Confucius and Mencius", has reached the peak of superstition in which there are gods for doors, kitchens, water and fire. The old and backward feudal superstition and moral constraints were looking for a new theory and new morality to change the old status quo. Darwin's theory just catered to the political needs of the time. It can also be said that this person who appeared as a "biologist". The politician Darwin did a very good thing at that time.
The British Empire was also the constitutional "mother country" after the industrial revolution, and was in the stage of expansion. The emergence of "legalized" privateering licenses was used as a national tool to strengthen the navy. Britain, the maritime supremacy, started with a group of pirates. When mentioning ancient pirates, the "Queen Pirates" who served as Commander-in-Chief of the Royal Navy immediately come to mind. Drake. Someone once said openly: The whole of Britain is a group of pirates, and Elizabeth is the largest pirate leader. In 1588, she destroyed the Spanish "Invincible Fleet", and then defeated the "Sea Coachman" Netherlands, and finally in the 18th century. In the later Seven Years' War, France was defeated and became the world's hegemon. The subjects of the "Empire on which the Sun Never Sets" used to look down on the world with the status of "winners". Before Darwin published his "Origin of Species", someone in the UK had already publicly published it. Many people's long-awaited struggle philosophy of "competition for survival, rule by the winner" is obviously the same as Darwin's theory, waiting for and tempting Darwin's "survival of the fittest" politics. Theory to cater to it.
What’s more, since the 15th century AD, British society has encouraged people to express their opinions publicly, which naturally created conditions for Darwin to create a “hero” for himself because he was confused at the time. Many people, including theologians, scientists, philosophers, and especially politicians, have given great psychological support and theoretical evidence on the relationship between human ability and God's authority. Marx personally wrote an inscription on the second edition of his "Das Kapital" and presented it to Darwin, calling himself a loyal admirer of Darwin.
Engels, the world's outstanding statesman, highly praised Darwin's "theory of evolution", especially the hypothesis that "human beings originated from ancient apes", and made several important additions to it. Engels said: "Labor created man" and "the use of fire made man finally break away from the animal kingdom".
After nearly 20 years of searching, the 50-year-old Charles Robert Darwin could not find a single fossil that could be regarded as a transitional type among the fossil specimens discovered at that time, and could not prove the authenticity of his thesis. In sexual situations. Darwin, who was very particular about evidence, compressed "The Origin of Species" into about one third and published it.
In an era when the true way was basically discredited, people had no way of knowing the true origin of living things. Darwin, a devout Christian who knew the true origin, and who had the crown of membership of the Royal Society at his fingertips, took people to the powerless desert, where living things gave birth to their own things, half way from true knowledge, according to the needs of the struggle at that time. ──“Natural selection” comes from agnosticism. Because it is a desert, as long as you can see the footprints, there is a road, so to this day, the "theory of evolution" by natural selection is just called "science".
At that time, driven by the influential politicians such as Engels, the hypothesis that "human beings originated from ancient apes" became a conclusive conclusion, making people think that our ancestors were indeed descended from apes. All over the world, no one cared that it would change from a monkey to a dog.
In the 76-page article "Darwin's Theory of Evolution", Darwinism himself admits that it is "a necessity of the times"; with the advent of the era of capitalism and colonialism, "theory of evolution" has become a necessity. For capitalists who believe in a capitalist free economy, "natural elimination", "survival of the fittest" and "competition for survival" are undoubtedly new weapons used to fight against socialists who advocate the position of the weak and conservatives who do not like change. . Darwin’s “theory of evolution” provided theoretical support to justify the exploitation of capitalist society and the domination of colonies by great powers.
A "biology" that encompasses the philosophy of political struggle has catered to the needs of many people who have longed for it and come together, pushing Darwin to the throne of a very respected "hero". The "theory of evolution" no longer requires more convincing evidence from logic, biology, archaeology or any other theory to become an unquestionable axiom. This is a fact of history, recognized even by real scientists in today's circles of Darwinist leaders.
The 7th edition of "Reference News" on May 20, 2010 reprinted a report by a physicist at the National Fermi Accelerator Laboratory in the United States: ...it will also indicate that humans may make changes to their own existence. explain.
Who among the real scientists has ever thought that human existence is the result of "apes"? Who with a little brain would say that Darwin's "Evolution Theory" is "science"?
The 12th page of "Reference News" on February 18, 2009 reprinted the article of Malcolm Hones in the Spanish "El Mundo" on February 10, which clearly tells people: "Darwin rarely wrote scientific papers, but "The Origin of Species" It is worth reading as a literary work.” The article clearly pointed out that Darwin, like Lincoln, was an epoch-making politician. The article said: “Darwin read the works of economist Thomas Matthews about human beings grabbing resources for survival. Two years later, the theory of 'natural selection' was founded."
Obviously, it was a huge blow to real biological science, and it was naturally a deadly enemy to moral concepts and theological thoughts of peace consciousness. Because it is not science at all, it completely changed the norms and directions of biological science, and was the need of the struggle situation during the capitalism and colonialism period at that time.
Sadly, because of the popularity of Darwin in the political circles that were in need of struggle at that time, it is inevitable that there are so many defenders of Darwin who do not know internal affairs and pretend to be "science" and compete with people.
The 42-page article in "Darwin's Theory of Evolution" clearly states: Malthus' theory gave Darwin the ideas he needed. Real scientists seek truth from facts and have openly and clearly attached a "survival of the fittest" illustration of the fight between the two. Just like a young man with a crew cut, even his underwear is pulled down for you to see, and you insist on calling him a "little girl", then what else can you do to make you understand? Is this person really true? Can’t tell what “science” is and what “struggle philosophy” is? Is it true that today’s literature can’t even classify “magic” and “science”?
Darwin also said it bluntly in his autobiography, 1838 In October of that year, I occasionally read Thomas Robert Malthus' cruel "An Essay on the Principle of Population", which influenced and inspired his evolutionary views...;
Malthusian theory A key influence on Darwin and Alfred Wallace, the founders of "modern evolution". Darwin said in his book "The Origin of Species": "His theory is the application of Malthusian theory in a field without the intervention of human intelligence. Darwin has been an admirer of Malthus throughout his life." Calling him "a great philosopher" ". Wallace called Malthus's work "...the most important book I have ever read" and called it "the most interesting coincidence" that he and Darwin independently developed the "theory of evolution" through studying Malthus' theory.
Malthus estimated that population would grow rapidly without control. In his view, the main factors controlling population were disasters such as war, famine, and disease. In short, according to this brutal proposition, in order for some people to survive, others must die. Survival means "forever war." Evolutionists generally agree that Malthus made many unintentional contributions to the theory of evolution. Malthus' thinking on population issues is the basis of modern evolutionary theory. Malthus reinforced his observation of the “struggle for existence” under conditions of “limited growth.” Thanks to Malthusian theory, Darwin recognized that the struggle for survival occurs not only between species, but also within the same species.
Darwin was influenced by these ideas and proposed that the strong and fittest would win in the struggle for survival.
The back cover of "Theory of Evolution" tells the story of the law of the jungle and the jungle: "Theory of Evolution: the story of the jungle of the jungle" cleverly connects the laws of biological struggle with human society. It breaks through the limitations of evolutionary science. Integrating history, anthropology, archaeology, sociology and management into it.
The cover of "The Origin of Species" blatantly declares: Think about the survival law of "natural selection, survival of the fittest" in social competition.
Darwin told people in Chapter 3 of "The Origin of Species" "The Struggle for Survival": Species of the same genus are more fierce than species of different genus. In Russia, small Asian cockroaches were expelled everywhere after entering the country. Large Asian cockroaches; in Australia, the introduction of bees quickly wiped out the small, stingless native bees... It also tells people: In the great struggle for survival such as food and shelter, the structure of one species to defeat another species is often hidden. Darwin also made it clear that we know very little about the relationships between living things. In other words, Darwin has clearly told people that he did not write the book from a biological perspective at all.
And he also advocated that the so-called struggle for survival is a legitimate and unchanging law of nature, applying such prejudiced and conflicting views of British society at that time to all aspects of nature. Therefore, the so-called "biology" inherited by his hands can only see the ferocious struggle of beasts, but not the harmonious and cooperative side of living things. It is just extended to the entire world with the help of the "biological world", giving it a seemingly scientific appearance. This is also stated calmly on page 46 of "Darwin's Theory of Evolution".
Darwin wrote to his friend Asa Gray, professor of botany at Harvard University, in 1860: "As to the theological point of view on this question [the origin of man], I have always been pained. I also feel confused. I have no intention of writing an article to promote atheism, but I admit that after seeing the evidence of creation’s design and God’s mercy around us, there seems to be too much suffering in this world... But on the other hand, if I am not willing to regard this wonderful universe, especially human nature, as the result of brute force. I believe that everything operates according to designed laws. The details... are called chances. But I feel that the whole problem is too inscrutable and cannot be solved by human intelligence..."
Darwin created the theory of "struggle for existence" and became it. The premise and foundation of his theory of "natural selection" is world-wide recognized. The obvious error of Darwin's "theory of evolution" is that he only sees the struggle of living things and does not see the mutual assistance between living things. It is indeed not like the structure and layout of scientific theory.