As a Northeastern, I have heard a great saying since I was a child: Don't forget September 18th and revitalize China.
Whether you have experienced it or not, there is nothing wrong with respecting history and cherishing the past.
On the day of commemorating the September 18th Incident this year, a Panasonic employee posted a patriotic picture in a circle of friends, but was warned by his superiors. What is the reason? Avoid unnecessary trouble? . The employee resigned angrily. As soon as this incident came out, Panasonic was pushed to the forefront.
Shinnosuke, the founder of Panasonic, once said in an interview with Deng Xiaoping that for the modernization of the new China? No matter what, you will try your best to help. . After the incident, Matsushita Group issued a statement at the Weibo, saying? Panasonic attaches great importance to the recent incidents that interfere with the legitimate speech of Panasonic employees, and will further verify the facts with the parties and deal with them seriously. Panasonic thanks all circles for their concern and will continue to contribute to the development of China? .
On the premise of not harming the interests of enterprises and national security, make legitimate remarks and express your own ideas. Neither leaders nor enterprises have the right to interfere. I always believe that an enterprise can develop so much in modern society and must maintain a correct corporate culture. Treating history with a neutral and objective attitude is one of them. Facts cannot be distorted, history cannot be tampered with, and justice cannot be erased.
This incident undoubtedly pushed Panasonic and a series of Japanese companies to the forefront of public opinion. At such a sensitive moment as 9 18, what is the enterprise's evaluation of remembering history? Unfair? It is inevitable that people will question the values and corporate culture of Japanese companies. Between China and Japan, due to historical reasons, there has always been some kind of? Estrangement? . Panasonic's behavior has undoubtedly made many people chilling.
I think an enterprise, especially a multinational enterprise, should not participate in state affairs and politics, and so should individuals. In fact, the employee's remarks did not interfere with the normal operation of the enterprise, but were interviewed because of historical issues between the two countries. The circle of friends is a space for everyone to express their ideas freely. As long as the speech does not involve libel, framing and other illegal acts, I think the speech can really be realized? Freedom? Yes I think it is acceptable for enterprises to supervise employees' speech. If you don't think it's right, you can also gently raise it with the employees, instead of dealing with the problem across the board.
The two countries have a long history, and cooperation is the only way to win.