The debate began.

Announce the rules of the game

Introduce the judges and guests

Announce a debate

Introduce the participating teams and their positions.

Introduce team members. 7. Debate contest

Judges' scoring

The audience participates in asking questions or expressing their opinions.

Announce the result of the game

Opinions of judges

The debate is over.

Second, the debate process (as shown below)

Detailed rules of the debate competition

1. Time prompt. During the debate, when each side has 30 seconds left, the timekeeper will give a yellow card reminder. When the time is up, show a red card to stop speaking, and the debater must stop speaking, otherwise it will be dealt with in violation of regulations.

2. Make a statement. Explain that the evidence is conclusive and sufficient, and the quotation is appropriate.

3. Make an opening statement. Argumentation requires facts as the basis, laws as the criterion, clear logic and concise words.

Attacks and arguments

(1) The debate on offense and defense begins with two debates, and the pros and cons alternate.

(2) The pros and cons participate in the debate. A summary of the debate between the pros and cons. Two or three arguments must be used as an attacker once; The defense is arbitrarily designated by the attacker, and the number of times is not limited. Both the offensive and defensive sides must complete this round of attack and defense independently, and cannot be replaced in the middle.

(3) Both sides must answer each other's questions directly, and the questions and answers should be concise and clear. Repeated questions and evasive questions will be deducted. In each round of attack and defense, the attacked party shall not ask questions, otherwise points will be deducted. Don't ask questions that affect the integrity of the other party's defense, and don't stop the other party from asking questions with a lengthy defense. The host has the right to terminate one party's overtime question or reply.

(4) The pros and cons complete the first round of debate. When either side takes a seat, it is deemed that its own attack and defense has been completed, and the other player will appear at will (make a statement or continue to ask questions) within a limited time.

(5) The stage of each round of attack and defense is 1 min 30 seconds. Neither the offensive nor the defensive set a time. When there are 30 seconds left, they will get a yellow card. When the time is up, they will show a red card to stop speaking.

(6) After the completion of the four rounds of offensive and defensive stage, the offensive and defensive summary should be made on the positive side first, and then the offensive and defensive summary should be made on the negative side for the team. The time limit is 1 min and 30 seconds. Both sides should summarize the situations and contents involved in the offensive and defensive stage, and it is strictly forbidden to recite the manuscript from the actual situation of the game.

5. Free debate. In this round of debate, the pros and cons automatically take turns to speak. First, anyone who agrees to stand up and speak, the speaker's seat is the timing sign that his speech ends and another speaker begins. Another speaker must speak at once. If there is a gap, the accumulation will proceed as usual. There is no limit to the order in which the same debater speaks. If one party runs out of time, the other party can continue to speak or signal the chairman to give up speaking. Free debate advocates active confrontation, and the party who avoids confrontation more than twice on important issues will be deducted, and the questions that the other party has clearly answered will be deducted appropriately.

6. Closing arguments. Both sides of the debate should make a summary statement on the overall form of the debate, be divorced from reality, recite the prepared manuscript in advance, and deduct points appropriately.

7. The audience asks questions. The performance of the pros and cons in the audience questioning stage is included in the competition results. The questions raised by the audience can only be answered after more than two judges have judged them valid. The audience is free to ask their own questions, and the pros and cons each answer the questions raised by two spectators, and both sides answer any debater except the four debates. The answer time of a question cannot exceed 1 min for 30 seconds. If one debater's answer time is not full, other debaters can supplement it. In the debate, the debaters of each team can concentrate the information on the self-made cards for reference when speaking, but they can't read the prepared manuscripts or show the prepared charts or plates. In a free debate, players can provide clues to each other. )

Competition description

1. The scorekeeper is opposite each team, indicating the time with a yellow card or a red card. And there is a "timer" to prompt. At all stages of the game, a yellow card indicates a time-consuming reminder, and a red card indicates that the debater has completed his time-consuming. The debater must stop speaking and sit down immediately, otherwise, points will be deducted as appropriate.

2. During the debate, players can refer to the materials (such as cards) prepared in advance. ), but 10 seconds don't allow them to see the material. Otherwise, group points and individual points will be deducted as appropriate.

Every player must wear uniform in every match, which is decided by each team.

Each team must arrive at the stadium half an hour before the start of the competition, so that the organizers can make unified arrangements for the competition and the preparations for various competitions can be carried out smoothly.

The debater's request

Each team consists of five debaters, of which 1 is the standby debater. The debater is required to be articulate, quick-thinking and fully prepared before the game. Chairman's requirements: correct appearance, clear articulation, cheerful and generous. There are four people in each team, which are the first debate, the second debate, the third debate and the fourth debate. They go through six stages: the first debate, the criticism debate between the two sides, the summary of the first debate, the free debate, the concluding speech and the audience's questions.

grade scale

1. The viewpoint is clear, the argument is sufficient, the quotation is appropriate, and the analysis is thorough and rigorous.

2. Smooth expression, accurate pronunciation, appropriate words, clear hierarchy and strict logic.

3. Sensitive response, strong counterattack, tacit cooperation, rich expression, dignified behavior and elegant demeanor.

Debate score table

How to write debate materials for a debate composition People often say, "It is beneficial to open books and read books.

However, on closer examination, this statement is not entirely correct.

If we are interested in every book, it may not be good to open it.

Nowadays, students may all like to read martial arts and romance novels, books and periodicals, and sometimes forget to eat or sleep. Once they get lost in reading, they will be possessed. Then they concentrate on books in class and have no intention to study, and their grades will plummet.

Others are attracted by some plots in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes take the road of crime.

Isn't reading killing yourself? This is only the first layer of "opening books is beneficial": opening books is beneficial.

And the second floor.

The second is that we should have a choice when studying.

Don't read unhealthy books that don't help us much.

When reading, you should read some books that are beneficial to your physical and mental health and helpful to your study and life.

Such a book is a good book. Only by reading well will you not ruin yourself.

Some people compare books to friends. If you value books, you will make good friends and make progress. If you don't read good books, of course, you will make friends with people who don't make good friends, and then you will regress.

Because near Zhu Zhechi, near Mexico is black! Therefore, only reading will be beneficial to you.

Therefore, in my opinion, opening books may not be beneficial.

I sincerely hope that every student can read books selectively.

Don't lead yourself astray and ruin your life just because you read a wrong book.

It is beneficial to open a book. "

Song Taizong and Zhao Guangyi have said this for more than 1000 years.

For thousands of years, it has been accepted by countless people and passed down from mouth to mouth as a wise saying.

Parents often teach or urge their children and elders to "study hard", thinking that as long as they study, they will gain knowledge and benefit a lot.

Therefore, people often say: "There are thousands of millet in the book", "There is a golden house in the book" and "There is Yan Ruyu in the book".

In fact, whether reading is beneficial depends on the quality of reading.

That book is a good book, and it is beneficial to open it; And if this book is not a good book but a bad one, it is not only useless but also harmful to open it.

In recent years, our books and periodicals market has produced many good books, but also many bad books.

Go to bookstores, book stands and book markets, and you will find some bad books everywhere.

What flatterers, what harms others, what face learning, and so on, this kind of book that teaches people to learn bad, only poisons and corrodes young readers, without any benefit.

As for those books that promote all kinds of negative and decadent ideas, cynicism and philosophy of life, and books that show a yellow and decadent lifestyle, it is even more harmful to open books.

Most people who talk about the benefits of opening books are well-meaning.

When they say that it is beneficial to open books, they mean to read good books.

However, the world is very complicated now, and some people really sell bad books to the world as good books for some purpose, especially teenagers.

They also say that opening books is beneficial, but it is really harmful to readers.

Nowadays, most teenagers are highly motivated and curious, and love reading, but they often lack discrimination.

In my opinion, our teachers have the responsibility to remind them to read more good books, at least harmless books, and never read bad books.

Opening a book may not be beneficial! adopt

The debate should be based on 800 words to convince people. Class 5 (1) staged a special debate today.

The positive view holds that opening books is beneficial, while the negative view holds that opening books is not necessarily beneficial.

The positive side stepped forward immediately, without giving the negative side the first chance: "If you read some unhealthy books, you have no knowledge, which is out of date in this information age.

The other person frowned and immediately asked, "Do you know what a healthy book is and what an unhealthy book is?" Founder stood relaxed and answered slowly: "Reading should be done in a regular bookstore, because there will be no unhealthy books in a regular bookstore.

"The other party immediately took out the killer:" Some students like to read game books, but they won't play games without reading them. These books are useless, but some people buy them, such as Wang Zehong ... "The other person stood up slowly and looked around as if he didn't think about what to say.

After a few seconds, he said, "We can see what kind of book this is from the cover.

Useless books can be eliminated directly.

What books do you want to read? It should be composition, prose, famous artists and so on.

The opponent began to talk about "truth" and was really serious: "But we are still very young and don't know how to distinguish useful books from useless books.

Some people go illegal just because they read some useless books.

"Founder said at lightning speed:" You can sleep and read all day without a bite of rice.

The opponent began to reason slowly again: "Bad books, like bad friends, may kill you.

With "murderous look" in kindness, Zheng Fang asked the opposing classmates with a big smile: "Excuse me, opposing classmates, if it is useless to open books, why does the teacher want us to read more?" Why should we learn knowledge from books? " The opponent immediately retorted: "What the teacher said is a Chinese book, but what if it is a useless book? That will hurt you! " The positive side also began to reason with the negative side: "Every time you open a book, there will be new gains.

The more I read, the more books bring me closer to the world, and life becomes brighter and more meaningful for me.

"Chairman" Mr. Wang delivered a speech: "Both sides of this debate are wonderful. Lou Kai, the opponent, is the best debater, and Zheng Zihao, the opponent, is the best debater.

But the winner is certain! "This debate has made me understand that opening books is beneficial, but some books are not good, so I don't need to read them.

Reading should be read in a regular bookstore, which is really "beneficial to open books".

"A news-based debate competition" consists of the host, eight debaters, ten judges and dozens of spectators.

The topic of this debate is which is more important, literary talent or eloquence, and literary talent is more important than eloquence.

Under everyone's expectation, the debater took his seat, the host's opening remarks ended and the game officially began.

In the first session, the two sides will debate and make statements.

The positive debater stood up, took his time, and completed his speech fluently at a uniform speed within the specified time, while the negative debater was a little nervous and finally completed it smoothly.

Then there is the cross-examination session, in which the positive side asks questions first, and the questioner can choose one of two or three debates, and then the opposing side asks questions and the other debater answers. In this link, the two sides were evenly matched and performed well.

It is the most wonderful free debate session. Listening to the debate on the lips of the debater, the audience is very excited.

Debaters argued one after another, and they all defended their views to the death.

The atmosphere at the scene was high and the audience applauded when it was wonderful.

After the free debate, it's time to make a concluding speech in the fourth debate. At this time, the audience quieted down and listened carefully to the summary.

In this link, neither side has enough time to make a statement.

After the speech, the debate has come to an end Now, the judges make a comprehensive comment on this debate. The judges objectively commented on the competition, praised those who did well, pointed out the existing problems and put forward suggestions for improvement.

Finally, the host announced the result of the game, and the square won narrowly. As a supporter of the square, I am extremely excited and excited.

After the results came out, the whole game was over.

This is my first time to watch the debate live. This is a wonderful debate.

The composition of the debate has all started. In the second class this afternoon, our class held a debate contest.

The topic of the debate is "It's beneficial to open books". Boys agree and girls object.

Everyone has made full preparations for this debate. As an opponent, I have also looked up a lot of information to prove that "opening books may not be beneficial."

The debate is about to begin! The host teacher humorously asked us to applaud the "host" and then announced the official start of the debate.

First of all, XXX, the representative of the square, spoke: "I think it is beneficial to open books." The ancients said,' Reading breaks thousands of books, writing is like a god'.

On behalf of XXX, the opponent said, "I don't think reading is necessarily beneficial, but reading some bad books is harmful.

So-and-so said affirmatively, "Then why do you read bad books?" ! I said, "Liu Xiang once said in the Han Dynasty,' Books are still medicine, and good study can cure fools'. This medicine is a good medicine for all diseases; The other is poison, which will kill people.

After that, a free debate began, and representatives of all parties spoke freely. Some students quarreled over a bad cartoon, but soon got back to the topic.

The more people talk, the more excited and enthusiastic they are, so that the order is chaotic and the debate can't go on. The presiding teacher had to announce a timeout and a debate ended.

Although it didn't achieve the expected results, from the students' point of view, everyone did make full preparations ... Give points first, which is only a small part. ...

An essay with the theme of argumentation and approval is no less than 800 words, and the collision between waves will produce beautiful waves.

What about the argument between people? In our daily life, quarrels between family members and families often occur. Some arguments are helpful to solve problems, while others have great negative effects.

So, I want to say: we should argue, we should argue correctly and reasonably.

The word "struggle" in the debate embodies one kind, one that dares to challenge authority.

Don't we usually encounter many problems and puzzles? At this time, we should dare to argue, break the shackles of superstition and the oppression of authority, and strive to express our personal opinions.

When Europe was dominated by Newton's "particle theory", Bohr, an ordinary physics teacher, dared to question this and insisted on expressing his own opinion-this is the "wave theory" of light that became famous all over the world.

Just imagine, how can a person who has no courage challenge authority and be desperate for truth? We should not be timid, but hold high the torch of courage to light the way forward.

Because we are fighting for the truth, the more we fight for the truth, the clearer the truth becomes.

Of course, when arguing, we should also pay attention to the correctness and rationality of the method, based on facts and convincing people by reasoning-the reason is not loud.

In fact, it is impossible to reach the other side of victory on impulse alone.

Courage is only the power of a rocket, which needs correct operation and reasonable methods to launch the rocket into the universe.

Therefore, when we argue, we should be different from person to person and pay attention to methods and manners.

If you just rush forward and don't understand the strategy of argumentation, you will not solve the problem, but will make things worse and even hit a wall.

The premise of an argument is that there is something to argue about.

If you argue endlessly about such things as "which came first, the chicken or the egg", or fight to the death for a little disagreement, you will lose the real meaning of the argument.

Our times have created an environment for young people to speak freely and provided a stage to fully display their own style.

Especially on some issues of principle, we should dare to argue.

The era without "debate" is sad, and the nation without debate is poor.

"Strive for results", "strive for progress" and introduce arguments into our schools and society, and our country will become stronger and more prosperous day by day.

Debate, with a fearless heart! Debate, keep up with the times! Let's argue, let's grow up in the debate! It's sunny today, and there are no clouds in Wan Li. The little boy Gai Gai is in a good mood. He went to the People's Park with the ball in his arms, humming a tune as he walked.

Gai Gai forgot to close her math exercise book when she went out. The figures in the math exercise book jumped out together, with squares, circles, corners and ladders ... After they came out, before they could relax their muscles, many figures stood up and said to everyone, "Brothers, we have been staying in the digital exercise book to serve our young master. It's really boring Why don't we have a debate today! " "good!" Hearing this, the ladder was full of energy and cheered again and again: "I'll go first!" " "The ladder jumped out and said," Let's talk about credit today! Credit, I am the biggest! I am also deeply loved by children! Look at me, more like a slide, children are like me! " "no!" Yuan Yuan shouted, "I made a great contribution! I can roll. Isn't the little master's ball round? If it were you, would you still be able to kick? "Fangfang is angry." That's not certain. Can you roll it up? "Take the house as an example. If the house is round, can it stand still? That house must be rolling straight, so I'm different. Stand firm, doors and windows, which one is not square? " Jiao Jiao couldn't sit still any longer, jumped up and said, "Then I am much more glorious than you. Isn't the red scarf triangular? " This is a corner of the red flag! "At this moment, the door opened with a click, the lid came back, and the figure went back together. In the evening, they had a dream. Fang Fang dreamed that everything was square, and the little master's ball was no exception, so he couldn't roll. The little master was very angry and said, "Building blocks are really annoying! "... Yuan Yuanmeng saw that everything was round and the house was round, but the house could not stand.

The ladder dreamed that the house was trapezoidal. It climbed happily to the roof to bask in the sun, but because the sides of the ladder were too slippery, it slipped down at once.

Jiao Jiao dreamed that there was a triangle in the sky. He is very happy. Suddenly, he let out a scream and touched his forehead, covered in blood.

Because the angle of the triangle is too sharp, I hit my head.

The next day, Geiger went to play football again, and the figure was indisputable, saying, "Don't be arrogant!" " "I hope to adopt O(∩_∩)O~

The advantages of this debate outweigh the disadvantages. Now is the information age, and computers are indispensable.

You can do many things online, such as reading, entertainment, stock trading and chatting. It can increase your knowledge, make friends and make you rolling in the deep. These are the advantages and disadvantages of computers.

Let me introduce the advantages and disadvantages of the network to you.

You can chat with your friends online. Even if he is thousands of miles away, you will feel that he is close at hand.

Unlike before, flying pigeons sent books, even if they were mailed, it would take at least two or three days.

You can also post your proud works on the internet for comments, so that everyone can know the quality of their works and improve their writing level.

Although there are many benefits on the Internet, it will also bring you a lot of trouble if used improperly.

Many people go to extremes because they are cheated on the internet, and some even go to crime because they have no money to go to Internet cafes.

Some people are looking forward to being in front of the computer for a long time, causing lumbar disc herniation.

The network has built a virtual world, which may make the weak-willed people fall into a "quagmire" and cannot extricate themselves.

We should be the masters of the network, not its slaves.

"Is it beneficial to open books?" Debate composition 500 words 15 People often say: "Open books are beneficial.

"But some people say," it is not necessarily beneficial to open books.

"For this problem.

Our class decided to hold a debate.

Good afternoon.

With the ringing sound of * * *.

The teacher came to the classroom with a brisk pace and held a special debate for us.

First of all, the teacher said, "I am the host of this debate." Let me talk about the rules. " .

Don't be rude, be reasonable and be kind. I now declare the debate officially open.

"The teacher's words sound just fell.

Party immediately said, "the book.

It is the ladder of human progress.

Only by reading more books can we improve our writing level, so I think it is beneficial to open books.

Xiaohua, the opponent, immediately retorted, "Reading a good book is like making a good friend, and reading a bad book is like making a bad friend.

The people near Zhu Zhechi are black. Once he makes a bad friend, he will be unable to extricate himself and fall into the abyss.

Don't turn over.

So I don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books.

Founder Xiao Ning calmly retorted: "Books are the source of human wisdom and the nourishment of human beings.

Just as a civilized country has lost the nourishment of books, this once rich and beautiful country will face the threat of extinction.

Therefore, it is beneficial to open the book.

"The opposition Xiao Tong also not to be outdone.

Plausibly said, "reading is not necessarily beneficial.

Because some books are really not suitable for us to read, not because the output is not good, but because the contents in them are not suitable for children to read, which will affect our physical and mental health.

Therefore, opening a book may not be beneficial.

"A class time passed quickly, although the debate was fierce, each said its own advantages and disadvantages, and didn't argue anything.

But personally, I think it is beneficial to open books.

Because books are our partners after all, except schools, we can only learn knowledge from books.

It would be better if we could distinguish right from wrong. Choose a book that suits you, so it will be good to open the book!

The composition "A Wonderful Debate Competition" begins: The bell of "Ding Lingling" rings, and the classroom of Class X is filled with thick "smoke smell", and a debate competition is ready to start.

Summary: This competition has enabled us to exercise our eloquence, show our advantages and increase our knowledge. What a heated and wonderful debate! The beginning: "Ding Rinrin-"The ringing bell rang.

The teacher came into the classroom with a big smile on her face and wrote down the topic right above the blackboard:-(Debate topic). The classroom suddenly exploded, and there was an argument. Some people said they should, others said they shouldn't ... Teacher Mao clapped his hands and the debate began! Conclusion: Although we lost this time, we are not discouraged.

This debate makes us understand that books are our spiritual food and our nourishment. Only by studying hard and studying hard can ideals ride on the wings of knowledge and promote our healthy and happy growth.

...

Give me an article about writing an argument. There was a wonderful debate in our class this morning. The topic of the debate is "Is it beneficial to open books?" Positive view: open book is beneficial, negative view: open book is not necessarily beneficial. I am honored to be chosen as the opposing debater. At the beginning of the debate, we appeared one by one. As soon as the host xu teacher opened the chatterbox, he directly cut into the theme: "Level 1-both sides stated." As soon as our voice fell, Guan Ruotong stood up: "No, reading is not necessarily good." We each have our own strengths, and the more we fight, the more we spit. The most wonderful thing is our second argument. Wang said: "Books are good medicine, but the medicine should be right, otherwise it is poison. Instead of curing the disease, it is counterproductive. I can't help you after reading it, let alone a medical idiot. " Just after this paragraph was finished, thunderous applause broke out from the audience, and I also thought to James Wang: Great, great! The first level is over. Although the other side is not to be outdone, I firmly believe that we will beat them. Next, it is the second level-free debate. The other party gave us a duel first, but we didn't panic, but calmly answered each other's questions. The other side kept asking questions, but they were all answered by our debater. First, I gave them a heavy stick to fight back, and then, after 56 wins, I killed each other unexpectedly. The other party suddenly lost its foothold, was speechless, and suddenly quieted down. Look at them all in a hurry, nervously looking at the prepared manuscript and discussing countermeasures in a low voice. My heart jumped there like a rabbit. Because, I think. The other party's answer was illogical and the question lost its edge. In my eyes, it's really a bit wrong. Occasionally, I ask some sharp questions, but they are all shocked by Dr. Wang's profound knowledge. Time is almost over. With the voice of the host xu teacher, the second level is over. At this point, the victory is close to clear. My heart is full of joy. The last level-summary. The other debater 4 spoke: "We ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… I stood up, my heart pounding like a deer. I took a deep breath and spoke fluently. It may hurt you. Therefore, if we understand' open book is beneficial' unilaterally and think that all books can be read, and we don't pick and choose, and don't ask about the content, it is actually wrong to think that reading is beneficial. It is beneficial to learn to choose valuable, healthy and suitable books to read. In short, we think it is beneficial to open books. "My voice ha ha, wonderful end of the debate, we won! I benefited a lot from the debate.

Song Taizu said that "reading is always beneficial". Since then, reading has become an idiom. However, I think that blind reading is not necessarily beneficial.

"People who can read are afraid of things they can't do.

"This famous saying means that people who read books can do anything.

Then, if that person reads a bad book and enjoys it, he may do bad things.

The Bishgachu in Nikolai Nikolai Gogol's Ghosts reads everything. He is not a man who reads widely, but a fool who lacks taste. Zhu Zeman in Zhuangzi Lieyu Crown learned a stunt of killing dragons. In fact, there is no place to kill dragons. Only then did he realize that there was no dragon in the world, and all his skills were in vain.

In this way, it is always half the effort to open books indiscriminately, and it is not worth the loss! Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining.

Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; Eating red dates is harmful to teeth; Taking this medicine is good for your health, but it also has side effects.

Fielding, an English writer, said, "Bad books are like bad friends, which may kill you.

"If one-sided understanding of" open book is beneficial "means reading all books, without choosing or asking about the content, reading is beneficial, but it is actually wrong! Be sure to learn a skill and choose the most valuable, insightful and good books that are suitable for you to read.

Therefore, I hope everyone will remember that opening books may not be beneficial, because no one is perfect.

No book is completely correct.

Although it is an idiom that opening books is beneficial, I believe that blind opening books may not be beneficial.

"People who can read are afraid of things they can't do.

"This famous saying means that people who read books can do anything.

Then, if that person reads a bad book and enjoys it, he may do bad things.

The Bishgachu in Nikolai Nikolai Gogol's Ghosts reads everything. He is not a man who reads widely, but a fool who lacks taste. Zhu Zeman in Zhuangzi Lieyu Crown learned a stunt of killing dragons. In fact, there is no place to kill dragons. Only then did he realize that there was no dragon in the world, and all his skills were in vain.

In this way, it is always half the effort to open books indiscriminately, and it is not worth the loss! Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining.

Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; Eating red dates is harmful to teeth; Taking this medicine is good for your health, but it also has side effects.

Fielding, an English writer, said, "Bad books are like bad friends, which may kill you.

"If one-sided understanding of" open book is beneficial "means reading all books, without choosing or asking about the content, reading is beneficial, but it is actually wrong! Be sure to learn a skill and choose the most valuable, insightful and good books that are suitable for you to read.

Therefore, I hope everyone will remember that opening books may not be beneficial, because no one is perfect.

No book is completely correct.

Okay？ I hope I can help you.

Please indicate the source for reprinting. How to have a debate? Process?