"Usually rely on accumulation, the examination room depends on play", which is the same experience of the students in the examination room. (A) language to establish a "vocabulary".
Vocabulary is the cell of an article. Vocabulary in a broad sense refers not only to the collection of words and phrases, but also to sentences and sentence groups.
There are two ways to establish "vocabulary": the first is reading. Usually, you should read books, newspapers and periodicals extensively, take reading notes, extract some beautiful words, sentences and paragraphs from a specific notebook, or make reading cards.
The second is life. At ordinary times, we should capture the fresh language in the popular spoken language and write it down in a small notebook or card that we carry with us. Over time, we can say it chapter by chapter and write it beautifully.
(2) Strengthen the accumulation of materials. Materials are the flesh and blood of the article.
Because many students usually don't pay attention to accumulating materials, they are worried every time they write a composition, or edit or copy it. The solution to this problem is to accumulate materials.
Usually, you can take a video camera and tape recorder with you, observe life deeply, actively participate in life, and record your experiences in family life, campus life and social life in time in the form of sketching, keeping a diary and writing observation notes. When recording, we should grasp the details and the characteristics of people, things, things and scenery.
The article written in this way is flesh and blood. (3) We should strengthen ideological accumulation.
Opinion is the soul of an article. The center of the article is not clear, or the thought is not profound, which often shows that the author's thought is superficial.
Therefore, it is necessary to establish a "think tank". There are two ways: first, be thoughtful.
"One more miss, one more gain." Think deeply at ordinary times and ask "why", "what" and "how" when something happens.
So you can see the essence through the phenomenon. It is also necessary to record the "sparks" of thinking and the conclusions of thinking at any time.
The second is compilation, that is, extracting famous sayings and aphorisms. In short, the composition should be accumulated, and the three writing warehouses of vocabulary, material and thought should be regularly counted, sorted and classified to continuously enrich and expand.
Second, to write a good composition, first learn to observe that Mr. Lu Xun emphasized two points when answering the question of "how to write a good article" for literary youth: one is to read more books, and the other is to practice more. Here, "seeing more" means observing more.
This shows that in order to write a good article and master skillful writing skills, it is necessary to observe more and learn to observe, and observation is the necessary premise and foundation of writing. Russian novelist Chekhov earnestly warned beginners: "A writer must train himself to be a keen observer and never give up! -It is a habit to exercise your own observation, as if it were second nature. "
It takes time to hone observation into habit and second nature, which is very useful and remarkable. Pay attention to the people, events, sights and things around you, and hunt for the materials needed in the composition: be interested in some seemingly insignificant but meaningful things, and pay attention to the cause, process and result of things; You should pay attention to how the plants in the campus flower beds change their colors all year round, and learn to get to the bottom of it and find out the ins and outs of these changes; You should go out, enter the society, meet more people, observe their words and deeds, think about some things, and integrate into your own thoughts at any time.
This is the process of observation. In the process of observation, we should pay attention to the following points: (1) Observation should never be limited to "seeing with eyes". Broadly speaking, more practical observation refers to mobilizing all the five senses of people: listening with ears, feeling with the body and, more importantly, thinking with the mind, so that the observation will be more delicate and profound.
(2) Pay attention to the use of "bad writing" in the observation process. As the saying goes, a good memory is better than bad writing.
Many students see a lot and think a lot every day, but they are not good at writing it down at any time, which will waste the observed materials and a lot of valuable things. (3) Pay special attention to perseverance in observation.
Don't make "brain fever". Three minutes of heat is not conducive to writing a good composition. You should observe life and think about every day in your life, so that you can write wonderful articles. Learning to observe plays a great role in laying the foundation and promoting a good composition. Without observation, you often find it difficult to write.
May you learn to observe, constantly cultivate and improve your ability to observe, and make great progress in your writing practice. Third, if the meaning is high, the meaning will be better, that is, to establish the center and intention of the article.
So what problems should the article pay attention to when expounding ideas? (1) Correct conception is the first meaning of the article. The so-called correctness is to ensure that the feelings and thoughts of the article are correct, in line with the nature and laws of objective things, in line with China's basic political principles, in line with people's basic moral requirements, and can give people positive inspiration. (2) Intentional singleness "The thing of composition is singleness, specialization is success, and dispersion is stupidity."
No matter how complicated things are, the main idea cannot be dispersed. An article should explain both this problem and that point of view, and it is ambiguous to ramble.
In fact, if you want to cover everything, it is definitely not in place. Moreover, an article can only have one center. Instead of "biting off more than one can chew", it is better to concentrate on expressing a center with pen and ink. Even if we express the center through several things, we should stick to the center, keep the same goal, pay attention to the combination of materials and centers, and let all the forces contained in materials point to the center. (3) The idea should be novel. Don't follow the crowd, the novel angle is the core of composition innovation.
The novelty of the idea requires jumping out of the old box and not following the advanced thinking, habitual thinking or the original psychological formula, but examining the alternative content contained in the topic from a unique perspective to avoid what others often write and what others have not written. Even the same writing object can always be cut from multiple angles. As long as we break the mindset, stand at the height of the times, avoid "vulgarity" and seek "difference", think from multiple angles and sides, or associate, or expand, or analogize, or reverse, we can find what people have not done.
2. How to write a good dialectical composition Dialectical analysis is a kind of argumentative essay, which is an article that analyzes things and clarifies the author's views and opinions. It is a style widely used in our daily life, which embodies strong logical thinking ability and finally achieves the purpose of convincing people by reasoning. Generally speaking, the argument is required to be clear and correct, the argument is typical and substantial, and the argument is rigorous and dialectical.
Argument, argument and argumentation are the three elements of argumentative writing that we often mention. Among them, debate is the soul, debate is the flesh and blood, and debate is the bone. Argumentation is to solve the problem of "what to prove", argument is to solve the problem of "what to prove" and argument is to solve the problem of "how to prove". If the three are closely related, a complete demonstration process can be formed.
In argumentative writing, what needs to be solved is the argumentation of argumentative writing. We will focus on how to demonstrate argumentative writing.
Argumentation is the method and process of proving an argument with arguments. It mainly organizes arguments and arguments according to certain logical relations to prove that the arguments are correct and credible. The purpose of argument is to reveal the internal logical relationship between arguments. Logically speaking, argumentative writing is a series of reasoning and proof by using concepts and judgments, and it is an important step to link arguments with arguments in argumentative writing.
Argumentative writing is the key and difficult point in learning argumentative writing. In the actual writing operation, students often have many problems in this link.
3. composition; How to write dialectical relationship is the duality of things. They exist in a unity, which is both opposite and unified. Without one side, the other side will not exist. Therefore, when we analyze the problem, we should consider it from two aspects, weigh the pros and cons, and make a scientific judgment.
Dialectical negation:
A philosophical concept representing the essential characteristics of negation. It refers to the internal negation of things and contains positive factors. Dialectical negation is self-denial driven by internal contradictions of things, and it is a dialectical process of self-movement and self-development of things. Dialectical negation is the development link of things, the metabolism of things, the leap from old things to new things and the result of dialectical negation of things. Only through dialectical negation of things can we realize the transformation from old things to new things and realize the leap from old quality to new quality. Dialectical negation is also the connection between things. New things are developed from old things, and they are internally related. Dialectical negation of things themselves is not simply abandoning the original things, but abandoning the old and negative things in the original things, absorbing and retaining the positive and vital things in the original things, and taking the form of transformation as the condition for their own existence and development.
As the development and connection of things, dialectical negation is "sublation", that is, both overcoming and retaining. Overcoming reflects the discontinuity in the development process of things, while retaining reflects the dialectical negation or "sublation" of continuity in the development process, which is the unity of opposites to overcome and retain the development, discontinuity and continuity of things themselves.
There are various ways of dialectical negation, and there is no fixed pattern. This is determined by the particularity of contradictory nature of things and the diversity of conditions. Things of different nature and the same thing under different conditions often have different dialectical negation methods. People's dialectical negation of things must be analyzed from the characteristics and specific conditions of their own contradictions.
Dialectical negation and metaphysical negation are opposites. Everything in the world, including people's understanding, develops by sublating itself because of its own internal contradictions. They deny themselves, but they also contain some affirmation of themselves, which is an infinite dialectical chain. Dialectical negation is a scientific summary of the dialectical relationship between affirmation and negation, discontinuity and continuity, change and inheritance. Therefore, it requires that the negative process of each specific thing should be treated differently and analyzed divorced from reality, which cannot be simplified. The metaphysical view of negation denies the contradiction of things themselves, regards the negation of things as an external force, and separates negation from affirmation, which is absolutely opposite. It either only sees affirmation, only recognizes the growth and increase or decrease of things, does not recognize the transformation of things, and regards negation as the disaster and destruction of things, thus affirming everything; Or regard negation as a simple abandonment of what is positive, and deny the connection between negation and affirmation, thus arbitrarily denying everything. These two tendencies will lead to one-sidedness and absoluteness of thought, which goes against the dialectical nature of things' own negation and is not conducive to people's understanding and practice.
4. How to write a dialectical composition for college entrance examination and learn it well?
Steps/methods
Let's start with an eye-catching topic. I think everyone has seen Conan. The title is like a suspense film, which makes people curious about this topic.
1. The beginning should be as small and exquisite as the phoenix head. If you have writing skills, you can extract a paragraph. Because writing skills are generally exquisite and meaningful. It can be written as a small parallelism sentence. If you want to write in the past, it is suggested to add something like "memory has fallen into, just visit again".
2. The middle should be as full as pork belly. Describe it in detail. There are four ways to write: appearance, movement, language and psychology. Generally, you use more language and psychology, so you can describe things in detail. When writing a composition, concrete examples can best reflect the quality of the characters. Specific cases are also called "typical cases". When writing a scene, describe it in order. It is not necessary to describe every scene in great detail, but there are details. The scenery can be vividly written by metaphor and personification. It is good to write imaginary compositions. If you fantasize about the future, write some imaginary advanced instruments into your composition.
The end of the article should be as short and powerful as a leopard's tail. Expand your thinking according to the result of the matter. Never put inappropriate labels, otherwise, no matter how well you write at the beginning, the grade of your composition will be dragged down by the end of the article.
Matters needing attention
? Don't write wrong words.
? Don't digress.
5. How to write a geography composition Mediterranean, a mild and humid winter, in this 65438+ February, it rained quietly. Lemon trees breathe in the air after the rain, and the coastline adds a bit of mystery to the gorgeous but unobtrusive Mediterranean style architecture. There is no reason why it is not too late to visit the stone-silent palm reader on Sardinia Island and listen to the quiet and noisy symphony of Venice, a water city.
The Suez Canal, with a long history and prosperity, is not a small shell wind chime that gives out crisp music under the sea breeze, but a series of profound bells from afar. Echoing each other tacitly with the river, they are busy singing, chatting about the trivial matters of hundreds of thousands of workers more than a century ago, and communicating peace and dance between the two continents.
Looking back at the Nile, the vicissitudes of the river flow into the Mediterranean, sighing and passing by, in the opposite direction. Let the boat sail to the Red Sea without hesitation, scoop up a spoonful of the saltiest seawater, and go all the way south, unable to catch up with the hurried pace of direct sunlight. Muslims passing through the holy city of Mecca show peaceful and pious expressions.
Cross the Mande Strait, turn into the Gulf of Aden, sail an arc along the coastline against the Indian Ocean monsoon circulation, and complete the first stop in Oman.
Arabia is a giant boot. The boat jumped from the toe of the shoe and made a drift bottle all the way, drifting to an unknown distance full of expectations. Just indulge in the counterclockwise warm current in the Indian Ocean in winter. It is Robinson's small raft, colorful merry-go-round, enjoying the sunshine at low latitude, and letting leisure draw the route into a circle. Of course, this is not a full stop.
To the east, along the outline of the Indian Peninsula, strange names are whispered, like ancient lost spells: Katiawa Peninsula, Narmada River. The western ghats blocked this strange sight. Those rivers that almost cross the whole peninsula will eventually run from Deccan Plateau to the Bay of Bengal earlier. Let's cross the Park Strait, bid farewell to Sri Lanka, bypass the estuary on the east side of the peninsula, and visit long-lost old friends. Visit them one by one, and go north along the coast until the Ganges River enters the sea.
Finally, in the huge figure of a 10,000-ton ship, I wandered into Malacca, Sumatra, Java and other islands. It was a dazzling jade necklace, and Malay Peninsula, Kalimantan and Sulawesi were the last hasty traces of this long journey.
That's all.
Put away the map, this is a small emotion woven by the "deliberate" route:
L-O-V-E
I like geography.
6. How to use dialectical analysis to write an argumentative essay Your question is quite difficult. It is quite high to use dialectical analysis to write a thesis.
First of all, I suggest you read Chairman Mao's On Contradiction and On Practice. These two articles are full of dialectical thinking, dialectics is very thorough and easy to understand. After reading them, you should gain something. If time permits, you can copy them over and over again, which will certainly benefit you a lot.
Secondly, the essence of dialectics lies in contradiction, that is, the law of unity of opposites. Some of its basic principles include the following philosophical categories: phenomenon and essence, universality and particularity, contingency and inevitability, form and content, principal contradiction and secondary contradiction, principal and secondary aspects of contradiction, cause and result, possibility and reality, and other basic principles such as universal connection and eternal development.
Third, using dialectical analysis to write argumentative essays is to analyze things in two places and analyze advantages and disadvantages by using the above basic principles and philosophical categories; Form and content of analysis; Look at the phenomenon and the essence through the phenomenon; Look at universality and analyze particularity; This paper not only analyzes the inevitable trend of the development of things, but also considers contingency (opportunity); See the results and analyze the reasons for the results; See the reality clearly and never let go of the possibility; We should not only see the development, but also predict the problems in development. Of course, there is no need to use every basic principle and philosophical category. If you can use a few, the article will be profound, meaningful and full of philosophy.
Fourth, flexible application. We should adhere to the principle of concrete analysis of specific problems and seeking truth from facts, apply it from the reality of the article and rely on it as much as possible. For example, when you see a region developing slowly, you will find that the ecological environment of this place may be very good from one side; On the other hand, if the development speed is fast, it may bring destruction and waste of environmental resources. For another example, if you see a child listening to the teacher and behaving well, then maybe the child lacks creativity. From the perspective of development, children may only follow the rules (inevitability) all their lives, and of course they may suddenly understand (contingency) at some stage.
Fifth, fully and reasonably use philosophical thoughts such as universal connection, eternal development and unity of opposites to analyze and judge things, practice more in daily life and improve your philosophical thinking ability. You can also practice using fables when reading them. For example, reading "Waiting for the Rabbit" is to regard a contingency as a necessity; "Carving a boat for a sword" means that you don't look at the changes of things with a developmental perspective; "Pulling out seedlings to encourage" violates the law of development of things and separates the development process of things; "The blind touch the elephant" only sees the one-sided and partial things, but not the whole and the whole. Just a few examples.
Sixth, when reading my answer, we should also look at it with dialectical thinking. We should not only see the scientific and reasonable places, but also see some inaccurate and incomplete places, as long as it can bring you some enlightenment. We should take its essence and discard its dross and apply dialectics everywhere.