However, the scientific investigation of Loch Ness found that it did not contain any traces of "monster" DNA at all. Nessie, a "kdspe" kdsps geneticist at the University of Otago in New Zealand, said that the environmental DNA survey of Loch Ness did not find any traces of giant reptiles or aquatic dinosaurs. This theory is sometimes used to explain mysterious monsters. It is reported that this phenomenon has appeared several times since 1930s.
Gemel said that the survey shows that there are more than 3,000 kinds of DNA traces living on the shores of Nice Lake, including fish, deer, pigs, birds, humans and bacteria.
Related: Photo Gallery. Ancient sea monsters
But "we didn't find any giant reptiles; We didn't find any reptiles at all, "Gimel told Life Science. We tested many ideas about giant sturgeon or catfish, but we didn't find them.
The researchers found that there were many eels in Loch Ness. Although unlikely, the researchers say that the trail of the Loch Ness monster may actually be covered with eels. He said: "In more than 250 water samples we collected, almost every water sample has eels." But are they giant eels? "I don't know," he said.
The story of the Loch Ness monster first appeared in a legend in the 6th century. It is said that Columbus, an Irish monk who later became a Catholic saint, quoted the name of God and ordered the Loch Ness monster to be driven away, thus stopping it.
The legendary monster, the huge Scottish Lake-one of the largest lakes in Britain, with more than 245 billion cubic feet (7 billion cubic meters) of fresh water-did not survive until the 1930s when a Scottish newspaper reported the sighting of Loch Ness. A few years later, a newspaper in London published a famous photo in which Loch Ness was said to be a wild animal. But this photo was later found to be a scam, using a toy submarine with a fake "sea snake" body on it.
Related: true or false?
The science behind these 12 unusual phenomena, Neil Gemel led the New Zealand team to conduct environmental DNA research on the shores of Lake Nice in the Scottish Highlands. (University of Otago) Later efforts to track the Loch Ness monster came to nothing, including sonar search in 2003 and BBC news reports.
But the story of Loch Ness Monster grows with its telling. In the village of Nadlocht, Locht, on the bank of Nice, a small-scale tourism industry was built around this monster, and there Drum still reports about this monster.
Gemel said that a few days before the investigation began, there were two reports of alleged monsters at Urkuhat Castle on Lake Nice.
"We," he said, "will take samples as soon as we get there. "So you might think, if there is something, we may have caught it.
The scientific team measuring Loch Ness investigated Loch Ness from June, 2065438 to June, 2008, and collected more than 250 water samples from the surface and bottom of the lake within two weeks.
Then, amplify a small amount of genetic material, detect the DNA of different animal and plant species, and extract cells from the water they left in the lake or flowed out from the nearby land.
Gimel said that these samples show which animals and plants have interacted with the local environment in the past 24 to 48 hours.
The research team didn't find any DNA from plesiosaurs, catfish or Loch Ness sharks, but they couldn't rule out the possibility.