"Righteousness" and "benefit" are a pair of corresponding relations: meaning must be combined with benefit, and benefit must be combined with righteousness; Righteousness needs the recognition and support of benefit, and benefit also needs the recognition and restriction of righteousness. The basis of "benefit" and "righteousness" is righteousness, and vice versa. So everyone has his own view of justice and benefit.

? Ill-gotten wealth is as rich as me and as a cloud.

? In social morality, the concept of justice and benefit is usually more valued by people, and whether you can be upright in the face of the contradiction between justice and benefit is to know whether a person is upright or not. The Chinese nation has always emphasized morality first. The Analects of Confucius said: "A gentleman is righteous, a villain is righteous and beneficial." Confucius thought that "ill-gotten wealth is as expensive as floating clouds to me." In the case of "you can't have your cake and eat it", Mencius advocated "giving up your life for righteousness".

? People can't be righteous before they benefit. Faith is more important than money. Ill-gotten gains are not desirable. Talking about "righteousness" must be carried out in the action of "benefit" Pursuing interests within the scope of justice is worth advocating, and justice and interests can be unified. It is shameful to destroy justice for personal reasons. To be a man, we should establish a correct view of justice and benefit.

? Those who follow interests regardless of honesty will only reap the consequences, which is the foundation of righteousness.