how should things, strategies, things, being, people, achievement and heaven be defined respectively in materialist philosophy?
In fact, there are many schools of materialist philosophy, which are far apart, and even have different understandings of "materialism". Under such a background, this question is actually a fake question! Even as far as a certain school of theory is concerned, it seems that no school has sufficient categories and concepts to accurately and strictly define "planning, things, being, people, success and heaven", especially "people".
philosophy is difficult. There is also a famous saying in aesthetics: (discussing) beauty is difficult. Knowing the difficulty and where it lies should be a yardstick for the introduction of philosophy.
It seems that the difficulty of "accurate and strict definition" can be circumvented if the above daily vocabulary is abstracted in a specific context. In this context, according to my philosophical views, things are objective reality, seeking is a rational subjective activity, things are the interactive process of subjective and objective reality initiated by people with a purpose and tried to control, being is determined by people, who are value judges, rational subjective activists and those who make the subjective (purpose) visible to the objective, and accomplish things. Taking this as a presupposition, the thesis of "Man proposes, God disposes" is analyzed below.
An analysis of the argument "Man proposes, God disposes": "Man proposes" is the background of the proposition, and "God disposes" is the proposition itself. The function of "man proposes" is to produce the contrast image and emphasis tone of "man" and "heaven" power in comparison with "god disposes" as the proposition itself, and there is no intention to express the meaning of "man proposes".
"God disposes" means whether "man" can achieve his goal in the process of the interaction between subjective and objective reality initiated with purpose and tried to control depends on the overall objective reality and its strength.
in this way, the mistake of this proposition is clear at a glance.
Nothing is absolute
"Man proposes, God disposes."
It's about people's subjective initiative and the objectivity of things.
Everything always has two sides and always interacts with each other.
Which side has the greatest power determines the result.
There is a cause and there is a result, but there is not a good cause and there is bound to be a good result.
Because: evil causes are also at work; Therefore, it can be seen that
good causes lead to the direction of good results, and evil causes also lead to the direction of bad results
As for whether the result is good or evil, it depends on the strength of both
People have worked hard, on the one hand, it leads to the direction of success, but there are
other factors leading to the direction of failure.
In fact, the truth is often very simple, just because people forget the truth because of their delusion, prejudice,
ignorance and persistence.
it's as simple as that.