1. What is close to vermilion is not necessarily red, and what is close to ink is not necessarily black

The ancients said: what is close to vermilion is red, and what is close to ink is black. Teachers and parents often use this ancient saying to educate us, but I have questioned this.

Are those who are near vermilion really red, and those who are near ink really black? This may only represent one type of person, that is, someone with particularly poor self-control ability. If a person is really "red when near red, dark when near ink", then I really feel sad for him, because he is such a failure as a human being, he has no brains, no stance, and is easily influenced by others.

“Those who are close to the vermilion are red”, is everyone like this? Let’s take an example from my side. Our school recently expelled several first-grade students, one of whom was my elementary school classmate. It stands to reason that my classmate received a good education in primary school because our school has strict management, the class teacher is a dedicated teacher, and the class style is also very positive. And the middle school we study in now is a first-class school in Chongqing. Here, there is a good learning atmosphere, high-quality teachers, and hardworking classmates, but why doesn't he accept these good influences? He also didn't study well all day long, often got into fights and skipped classes, and was eventually expelled from school. Isn't it "the one who is close to the red is red"?

Is this true for everyone? Let’s take the example of our foreign language school. Among the non-regular classes in the first grade of junior high school, no one entered the top 80 in the entrance examination. Most of the students' grades were not very good. However, in the final examination of the last semester, one student from Class 10 entered the top 80. Top 10 in grade. Logically speaking, the class style of their non-regular classes is not as good as that of regular classes, and their grades are also worse. But why hasn't this student suffered from those negative effects? Isn't it "the one who is close to the ink is black"?

There are many such examples around us. Whether "the one who is close to vermilion is red, and the one who is close to ink is black", in the final analysis, the reason lies in ourselves. Of course, it does not rule out that the environment has a negative impact on us. It will definitely have an impact.

Those who enter the vermilion may not necessarily be red, and those who enter the ink may not necessarily be black.

2. Those who are close to ink are not necessarily black.

There is an old Chinese saying: "Those who are close to vermillion are red, and those who are close to ink are black." It means that the surrounding environment has a great influence on people. . However, if one is close to vermilion, it must be red, and if one is close to ink, it must be black? I think the influence of Hei is important, but it depends more on the person who is close to Mo. Those who are close to ink are not necessarily black.

(Ask a question)

Marxist dialectical materialism believes that in the change of things, there are two factors, internal and external factors, and external factors can work through internal factors. Similarly, for a person, the "Zhu" or "Mo" around him will of course have a certain influence on him, but as a person who is close to Zhu or Mo, his intelligence, perseverance, and discernment will turn red or black. determinants. If he is confused about right and wrong, he will do what others say and will not analyze and decide by himself, then the person who is close to ink will become black; if he has a clear mind and a firm will, then no matter what kind of ink it is, it will be difficult to make him black. In short, what is close to vermilion may not be red, and what is close to ink may not be black. It depends on what is close. (Be reasonable and analyze the problem)

From ancient times to the present, there are people who are black when they are close to ink, and there are also people who are not black when they are close to ink. Li Ling and Su Wu in the Han Dynasty were both Han officials. Faced with the temptation of high-ranking Xiongnu officials and generous salaries, Li Ling wavered and was ultimately ruined. Su Wu was unyielding and would rather live with his hair and drink blood, and swore to the death to disobey others, thus making his reputation eternal. In modern times, Lu Xun, my country's great proletarian writer and revolutionary, was a model who was close to the ink but not black, and emerged from the mud but not stained. These people maintained their firm beliefs, stayed clean in the ink, and did not follow the crowd, thus achieving great things. (Present the facts)

How can we be close to black but not black? As long as you have a clear mind and a firm will, you can be close to ink but not dark. Zhou Enlai, Lu Xun and countless other ancestors have set examples for us with their practical actions. I hope each of us can maintain our firm beliefs and never change our colors no matter what the environment. (Conclusion)