Another example is diseases, patients with major diseases, and many diseases can make people live a normal life. Include brain diseases, muscular atrophy and heart diseases. Or organ disability, eyes, ears, hands, feet, limbs, any kind of disability can not work like normal people, and even robots need to replace new spare parts after the mechanical limbs and trunk are damaged.
Moreover, there must be tangible welfare guarantees to solve the emergency survival and assistance of these people.
If a poor person has all the above unfavorable and vicious conditions. Not only are we unskilled, seriously ill, disabled, and even hungry, we can only meet one end: death.
I say this only in the imagination of some basic possibilities and assumptions.
I think your words are actually the same as the famous saying of the ancient Emperor Jinhui: "Why don't people eat minced meat?" . Because you know nothing about poverty. So you asked such a strange question.
PS: At the same time, just as far as agriculture is concerned, you should ask how the ranches in the United States of America operate. Why do they have so much food and abundant treasury? Can the record of large harvesters harvesting half a city at a time be compared with that of most poor countries in Asia using a small piece of old broken Niu Yi open space and a muddy and dirty cultivated land? Whether people's thinking can determine whether people can survive or dominate in the world.
Your thinking is closely related to your knowledge and insight. Different countries, different systems, different arrangements and different methods can determine different results. The same latitude and similar cultivated land are divided into one country, and as a result, many people will not farm a lot. The state is private property. Therefore, a professional farmer can teach you how to make oats. Extremely stupid people, if they are given the same land, they will not gain much. I totally disagree with your title and its blind point of view now. Poor people can also use different viewpoints, different thinking, different knowledge and even different technologies to achieve different results.
Even, I wonder why the poor in America don't work, because they have too many ways to get rich quickly without working, because this comes from their different thinking. People's thinking and IQ are different. So, you have nothing to do. Watch more movies. When you see many classic examples of poor Americans who can survive without working, you will realize something. There are still many people who still earn money without physical labor/physical expenditure.
In addition, there are differences between human nature and IQ. In some ethnic groups, a poor person still has to have many children (2- unlimited). Some ethnic groups, even if they are very rich, still have only one child, not more than three at most. In the face of the choice of quantity, many people still rationally consider all the problems in this world. This is not a new problem. On the premise of fixed resources, the more people there are, the less the average amount is. This is a simple trigger, but many people have never thought about it. The issue of social security was also mentioned. In fact, after careful analysis, this question is even longer than a paper. Your question seems simple, but it is actually a national policy issue. It's so complicated and such a short space is really limited. So, think about your answer with your own brain.
If you really can't simulate how the poverty rate in a country appears and is solved, then you can try the simulated urban construction game to see how the poverty rate in a region or country is solved. It's just a matter of thinking.