In daily study, work and life, everyone has written a composition, which can be divided into limited composition and unlimited composition according to the different writing time limit. Do you know how to write a good composition? The following is a 600-word 10 debate essay for your reference, hoping to help friends in need.

Debate composition 600 words 1 debate starts in the afternoon. This must be a wonderful and exciting game. By noon, I couldn't sit still. I am like a marionette, talking and walking with excitement. My good friend saw me like this and begged for mercy again and again: "Please be quiet for a while, I want to remember the debate words!" " "I looked at her solemnly and had to sit down. But I still can't control my excitement.

Which side will win? Positive? It is possible, because "opening books is beneficial" is an idiom, and there have been many useful allusions since ancient times. Anti-Party? It is also possible, because this time it is one or two groups against three or four groups, and there are many eloquent students in three or four groups, which can be said to be strong. Just when I was thinking, the game began. The teacher wrote six powerful characters on the blackboard: Is it beneficial to open the book?

From the beginning, Chen Qianqian, who was on the positive side, gave the opposing side a duel: "I advocate that it is beneficial to open books. Reading regularly can increase your knowledge and broaden your horizons. As the old saying goes,' You can't eat meat for three days and read books for one day'. The other party couldn't respond at the moment. After waiting for a long time, Liu Yinggang of the other party stood up and said, "Then let's study every day!" Chen Qianqian immediately connected: "Thank you for your argument." The whole class burst into laughter. Liu Yinggang realized that he had helped and couldn't help laughing.

The debate continues. When several famous examples were cited, an interesting scene appeared again. Julia and the opposite stood up at the same time and said in unison, "Ma Su knows the art of war and talks about it …" The class laughed again. This time, even the teacher couldn't help laughing. I even burst into tears and thought, "They are not the same person and have different heads. How can they say the same thing? " Is this the harmonious heartbeat of the sacred unicorn I feel? "

In laughter, the debate ended. It doesn't matter who wins or loses. What's important is that we have exercised our courage and eloquence in laughter, and learned that we should read healthy and beneficial books before we can really open them.

Gorky said: "Books are the ladder of human progress." Why do I feel that this ladder is good or bad?

The teacher said, "On Teacher's Day, we held a lecture entitled" Is it beneficial to open books? " Many students chose affirmation. If no one is against it, then the debate can't be held. I'm struggling. I have to prepare both materials.

That afternoon, I was lying in bed reading Pinocchio. I saw the second chapter of the book: the puppet ran out of the house alone, its father chased after it, and the police stopped the puppet. Dad criticized the puppet after catching up with him, but passers-by still pointed at dad, and finally dad was sent to prison. Without his father's care, the puppet was so hungry that he had to beg for something to eat, but people often played tricks on him and threw cold water on him. Hungry and cold, he fell asleep by the fire and his leg was burned. Dad came back, and when he saw the scene in front of him, tears could not help falling. I made his feet again, and they stuck together completely ... from this story, I learned to listen to my parents and not follow my temper. I find "opening books is beneficial".

But I think sometimes it's no use opening books. I am fascinated by detective stories. When I sleep at night, I feel a cool breeze blowing from my back. I feel so scared that I dare not sleep. I really want to sleep between my parents. If I don't read that detective novel, I won't be afraid. Also, in the process of reading, we learned a lot of knowledge outside the text, but a lot of bad information also came in, for example, someone read a book and learned the behavior and crimes of bad people from it; Some people are addicted to stories, unwilling to make progress and don't want to learn.

Our class debate puzzled me, but for the sake of the class, I finally chose the point of view: "opening books may not be beneficial!" " "I don't know if my dim view can win. Oh! Tangled!

The 600-word essay 3 "Open book is beneficial" seems to be an irrefutable truth, but some people object. In this regard, we launched a special debate contest. The flying heads all pointed to Maimang, and their eyes were wide open and small. No one would give in, but they forced their opponents to the Jedi.

The first round of competition has begun. First of all, Founder 1 began to speak. He clearly said, "I think it is beneficial to open books, because books are the ladder of human progress." After saying his word, the cheerleaders and allies of the square camp began to cheer: Wow, that makes sense. I used a big move for the first time. Some people turned their heads and looked at their allies triumphantly. The eyes clearly said, "Look, look, you will lose." Those anti-party comrades are so angry that their teeth are almost falling out.

But the result seems to be beyond our expectation. Only the debater of the opposing side,No. 1, replied slowly: "Yes, you are right, but there are good and bad books. After reading a bad book, won't the book go bad? " Ancient officialdom was full of scholars, but why were most of them corrupt officials? Haven't you read bad books? ! As soon as this statement came out, the "audience platform" was immediately silent, and everyone looked at the supporters nervously. The opposing allies were so proud that they stuck their tongues out at the pros.

But the diamond player was not flustered at all, and said slowly, "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." This sentence was written by the famous Liu Xiang. How do you explain it? "This hit the nail on the head, even the teacher yu took the lead.

But before he finished, Lao Zhou, the top debater of the opposing side, jumped out.

Asked loudly: "medicine is divided into good medicine and poison." What if I drink poison? " This time, the applause rang louder and the top of the classroom was almost overturned. ...

The debate ended with laughter, and the players and onlookers were still talking about it after class. This is an idiom: enjoy it.

Today's Chinese class is particularly lively. From time to time, there are voices of "speaking for the right" and "speaking for the opposite" in the classroom. Did CCTV's English Debate Competition for College Students come here to settle down? It turned out that it was our class that held a debate on whether it was beneficial to open books.

Supporter Bao Yang spoke first: "Please say yes first." Xu Xiaoshu recited loudly, "The book has its own golden house, and the book has its own Yan Ruyu." Wait for a few ancient sayings that are beneficial to open books. Our Lu Chang also pushed him back with a few useless words written by modern celebrities. After all, Xu is eloquent, not easily nervous. In the face of Xu's growing offensive, it seems a little difficult. At this moment, Zhang Junjie stood up and expressed his view that bad books were useless, but they helped us. Xu pushed us to the corner of "it is difficult to buy bad books" Seeing that there was no way out, I stood up without thinking too much. I bypassed the corner of "it is difficult to buy bad books" and pointed out that books such as feudal superstition are still popular, and then cited the example of "Daxian's wife killed her husband". The other side is not to be outdone, saying that there is nothing wrong with religious beliefs such as Buddhism. This is so funny. We say that feudal superstition is not Buddhism, but a cult. They say there are not many books about cults. The public said that the public was right and the woman said that the woman was right, and the scene was in chaos. Supporter Bao Yang shouted: "Silence! Silence! " I knocked on the pencil case again to stop the farce.

Ark took the lead in the new round. He pointed out that reading bad books has become a major reason to lure teenagers to commit crimes. We just want to applaud him, but the opponent is not a vegetarian. Shao Jingjing only used one sentence: "As long as you have restraint, you won't commit a crime." Perfectly rejected the view of the ark. I took over. I once said that Japanese comics were harmful to teenagers, so we found a breakthrough. We are going to win a large-scale attack, which is another sentence of Shao Jingjing: "Comics can increase imagination when watched properly." Keep your opponent alive. Xu Xiaoshu added: "Students who oppose it also read comic books." We are losing ground.

It is often said that "opening books is beneficial". Some people also say that "it is not necessarily beneficial to open books." Our class organized a debate on this issue on Tuesday. Zhenqing and I are the hosts of this debate. The competition is about to start, and the students are very excited and eager to try.

The first appearance was a debate about Xinyuan. She stood up suddenly and started a conversation. First of all, she is in the lead. She quoted the classics to explain the benefits of reading more clearly, and gave the other party a "duel" from the beginning.

Followed by the other party's debate about Iwamoto. Although he is young, he is well-founded and well-informed. He quoted many suggestions and collected the possible disadvantages of open-book reading. He has a clear mind and is not chaotic in the face of "danger", which makes people praise him.

With the excellent performance of both sides, everyone expressed their opinions. The smell of gunpowder is getting stronger and stronger, and the classroom is filled with smoke. Everyone argued endlessly. I was moved by the heated debate and began to rub my hands.

But considering my status as a host, I have to express my "neutral" view by summing up: since ancient times, people have thought that "opening books is beneficial", which of course makes sense. Reading books can not only accumulate knowledge, but also learn good words and sentences. You can also learn life skills and the truth of being a man from the book, which really benefits you a lot. Why not? But on the other hand, think about it: although extensive reading can broaden your horizons, it is also "not all beneficial to open books." If you read those unhealthy books, you will be led astray, and you may even go to the abyss of crime, then you will lose more than you gain.

Soon, the debate will end. Our glib soldier wants more. They were angry and angry, flushed, and it was difficult to tell the winner. It seems that the two sides are evenly matched! Helpless, in the end, the teacher had to judge the best debater, but in the true sense, the two sides were neck and neck.

Although the debate did not judge who was the champion, everyone learned a lot from it and gained a lot of happiness. My final opinion about this debate is that it is certainly beneficial to open books. But the most important thing is to learn to distinguish right from wrong. Reading more books is a good teacher and friend in life.

The debate was very successful. Well done!

A little reporter has a charity activity "Give me a lawyer's dream-climbing the activities of a little lawyer."

Hearing this, I immediately signed up happily. Soon, I received a notice. I successfully reported this activity, and I jumped with joy.

I got there, wrote a personal report and started. I received two questions, 1: Who do you think the lucky money should be given to? Actually, I've thought about this problem, but sometimes I don't think too much. We can say that because money is given to us by adults, it is naturally our own. Of course, I'm also thinking about giving it to adults. It can be said that because adults give it to others, others will give it to you, so this is for adults, so I choose to give it to us. I said, "What is said to us is naturally our own." However, the other party also said according to my inference: "Adults will give it to others, and others will give it to you, so this is for adults." The classmate next to him commented: "this money means reciprocity, and of course it should be given to us!" " "But if adults don't give money to others, will others give it to you?" Words just say that finish, a classmate will pick up "... ah ... ah ... ah ... ah ...

The second topic is: if you are trapped on the train track, there is a change of track in your hand.

Button, but the track that the button leads to, one is tied to the old man and the other is tied to the child. What will happen to you? I cut off the child first, because the child is the youngest and has the longest life, so it doesn't deserve to die. And now I'm thinking, whether to die by myself or by the old man. The old man's words are because his life has come to an end, and my life is still very long, but the car is coming towards me. Who am I to change the fate of others? So, I said, "The car is coming towards me. What qualifications do I have to change the fate of others? " So I think I should die. "I said, everyone agreed!

After that, the teachers gave us a small lawyer's license, and we got the lawyer's license and took a photo with the lawyer. I am all smiles and very happy.

At this time, I must feel that this is my happiest moment.

On Tuesday afternoon, in the third class, our class fell out and laughed constantly. Why is this? Because our class is having a wonderful debate.

After the host introduced the rules, the pros and cons began a heated debate. The theme of this debate is "Should primary school students touch mobile phones". The positive view is that "primary school students should touch mobile phones" and the negative view is that "primary school students should not touch mobile phones". With the teacher's command, a tense and fierce debate began. I saw that the debaters on both sides were like soldiers on standby, all eager to try, spirited and high-spirited, and seemed to have answers.

First, let's start with a debate about affirmation. She said: "We think primary school students can have access to mobile phones. Because it's good to use a mobile phone. There are many softwares on the mobile phone that are helpful to our study, such as "homework together" and "homework help". Not only that, the mobile phone also has a camera function, which can record beautiful moments. " The frontal debater spoke very vividly. So how should the opposing party refute it? I saw the opponent arguing vividly: "We don't think primary school students should touch mobile phones. Because there are many online games on mobile phones, many students are addicted to them, staying up late to play and having a good time. This will hurt your eyes and affect your study. " After she finished speaking, the whole class applauded immediately. Then, the pros and cons will speak in two or three debates. I saw them quarrelling as a bee. No sooner had they finished their quarrel than they began a free debate. I saw the students take turns to speak, like birds vying for food, for fear of not having their own share. The most interesting thing is that a classmate actually asked a positive question: "Have you never touched a mobile phone since you were a child?" Made us all laugh. The students will express their opinions for and against for a while. By the end of the class, the students and debaters were all flushed, just like a group of "peppers".

The debate is over. This is really a wonderful and interesting debate. I like this kind of debate, and I really hope to participate in it more often in the future.

Debate composition 600 words 8 "In this debate, let's talk about Ding Jinhao's carving of' Ding Jinhao's trip' on ancient Egyptian historical relics more than 3,000 years ago. Do you think we should forgive him? Let's start the discussion! "

As soon as teacher Lin's voice fell, everyone raised their hands. "The square starts first!" "Teacher Lin said, first of all, Liu Xianzi stepped forward in the square and said politely," We should forgive him! Everyone must have a tolerant heart. " "no! Should not be forgiven. 1, the interests of the motherland are above everything else. He has disgraced our country. When he admitted his mistake, his parents took the initiative to admit it to his face, but he didn't stand up and take responsibility. 4, ..... "Liu Yishou, an opponent, worships Buddha, dancing with one hand and saying emotionally." Where is a monk! " The teacher said humorously that the students all burst into laughter. I was thinking: What can I say?

"Do you think, if there is a flower with seven petals, if I take off one of the petals, the flower will not be perfect. The motherland is like this flower, and Ding Jinhao is one of the petals. In other words, if we keep scolding him, this petal will wither and the world will be incomplete. " Great, said Liu Yaochen, our square, while thinking. Liu Xianzi added: "They all cried when they admitted their mistakes. If we blame him again, we will increase our mistakes! " What a refutation! My heart finally calmed down.

"Although, they did cry, but crying can't solve all the problems! Does everyone who makes a mistake seldom cry to solve it? " Yu Zhiyue of the opposing side stood up and said emotionally. I thought about it and found it very reasonable.

Everyone continues to "talk to each other" ...

The debate is over, but I still have the same scene in my mind. I decided that I couldn't make this mistake myself. He is an example. I can't be too strict or too lenient with mistakes.

Debate composition 600 words 9 "The theme of this debate is whether it is beneficial to open books. The requirement of this kind of debate is to hold one's own opinions, respect each other and convince people by reasoning. Ok, now please ask the affirmative debater Jiang Yumeng to give a positive opinion. " Teacher Xi announced on the stage that a heated debate had begun.

Jiang Yumeng whoosh jumped up from his seat and looked down at the opposite side as if he had won the game. The momentum seemed to eat us all. What are you proud of? Not a winner yet! "Open book is beneficial" is what Song Taizu said. ........................................................................................................................................... Before ...................... could wait for Jiang Yumeng to sit down, the opposing debater Cao Yun immediately stood up and retorted, "Some unhealthy books will lead many teenagers to commit crimes after reading them ..." It seems that my worry is superfluous, and Cao Yun is right. "People who read bad books and embark on the road of crime are out of their minds ..." Qu Zilin, Fang, gushed. I am absent-minded, I mumble, that is not necessarily everyone is absent-minded! Ha! I found her loophole, so I should give them a good fight during the free debate.

Then there is more intense free debate time. The pros and cons confronted each other, the classroom was full of gunpowder, and war was imminent. "We think it is beneficial to open books ..." As soon as the discussant sat down, Cao Yun immediately retorted. "There are many unhealthy books on the market. Is this beneficial? " Everyone is very angry. If you don't let me, I won't let you. You argued word for word, and the war entered a white-hot stage. "Is it the knife's fault that a person cuts people with a knife in the street?" Tao's aggressive words made us a little overwhelmed, and we were about to be proud. Fortunately, Dong Yifan blocked a wave of "floods" ...

Finally, the teacher made a summary: "Both sides of the debate are well prepared and well founded. Our debate is wonderful! But the purpose of holding this debate is to tell you what kind of "paper" you should open Read books selectively in the future! "

Our opponents gained the upper hand, because they were well prepared and justified, and everyone cheered. The square is like a defeated rooster, depressed. This is really an unforgettable debate!

Debate composition 600 words 10 The bell rang, and the head teacher loudly announced that there would be a debate in this class, with the theme "Is it beneficial to open books?" . After hearing this topic, most students, like me, think that opening books is beneficial, but many students also think that opening books is beneficial. Before the debate began, the students formed a camp, and the war of words had already started among the students. Every student is full of confidence and thinks his point of view is correct. Who will win this debate? See you after the game!

The heated debate has begun! I saw that all eight debaters had answers, eager to bring their blessings of victory and determination to win, and stared at their opponents from time to time as if to "kill" each other with their eyes. At the beginning of the debate, I saw affirmative Xiao Wang preemptively say, "We think it is beneficial to open books. Du Fu said-reading will break thousands of books, and writing will be like reading ... "He was fascinated and eloquent, as if he were integrated with what he said. At this time, Xiao Jiang, who was on pins and needles, stood up and retorted, "We don't think it is necessarily good to open books ..." Xiao Jiang's language reflected the firm attitude of the opposition and gave a perfect blow to the positive side with strong reasons. At this moment, I can't help thinking, "Who can win and who can lose?" The game is really getting more and more interesting! Suddenly, Xiaoguo in the square suddenly stood up and said angrily: We think it is beneficial to open books ... When he finished, everyone applauded Xiaoguo in their hearts. Everyone on the other side felt the pressure doubled. Just in the middle, the teacher stood up and said to everyone, "No matter who is in favor or against it, it is ultimately a sentence: books should be read, but you should choose good and useful books to read." "

In this debate, I understand a truth: we should learn to read selectively, and we should read good books and useful books.

;