For those who are in the inner volume, this represents greater pressure. Because the content product remains unchanged, people in the content product have to face more tasks and less rest. Only by giving up more rest time and working hard can they stay inside? In the volume? . However, people's energy will be exhausted one day, and the vicious circle of involution is infinite. When the degree of involution exceeds the upper limit of almost everyone's ability, then the society will usher in a big collapse. If we don't intervene early, then society will cause irreparable losses.
Needless to say, people outside the inner coil will find themselves pushed out of the inner coil because of their slow start or slack in the middle. Everyone is treated equally in the paper, and you won't stop because of your slackness, so when people outside the paper find that no matter how hard they try, they naturally lose their competitiveness. With the deterioration of involution, more and more people are thrown out and more and more people are lost.
So is involution really good? I think it is obviously not good. I agree with Professor Tsinghua University that competition can be beneficial, but it must be benign. Involution is vicious competition, which will only make people suffer from internal friction, and then more and more people will be abandoned by involution. It is precisely because more and more people can't stand it, so? Lie flat? Gradually become the only way that young people can think of to fight involution.
Is it wrong to lie flat? If we know about western European countries, we will find that workers often go on strike intermittently. When their rights and interests are hurt, they will bravely stand up and occupy subway stations, occupy streets and defend their own interests. All they want is to get what they want in return, suitable wages and working hours. But in our country, you see, no matter what kind of work, there are always people rushing to do it, no one will go on strike, and everyone wants to squeeze their heads into a good system. It is precisely because of this that those unscrupulous merchants continue to reduce the wages that workers deserve and constantly eliminate those who are not capable enough. Some people say this is it? Survival of the fittest? But does this society really want to eliminate most people who don't have excellent abilities? We are not a capitalist country, which needs to be remembered.
Indeed, I think the existence of this involution in the academic field is reasonable, because the motherland is in urgent need of a large number of talents, but is this involution also needed in normal work outside the academic field? I don't think it's necessary. We should be soberly aware that human nature is greedy, and so are capitalists. If no one stands up to resist this involution, then unscrupulous merchants will continue to exploit employees, and only when workers and capitalists reach a balance of confrontation can they enter a virtuous circle of society. At this time, competition is benign. So at this time, a group of people must stand up and respond to the involution, and young people should stand up without hesitation, so I think? Lie flat? No problem. It takes courage to come out and lie flat at this time, and? Lie flat? Doesn't mean we don't work hard. We lie flat just to get a chance to work hard. I hope everyone is against this? Lie flat? People know.