Napoleon's classic saying: "A soldier who doesn't want to be a general is not a good soldier" has inspired many people to keep forging ahead and succeed. The world is vast, how many ordinary people have accomplished nothing, how many ordinary people have lived a dull life, and how many people have made great achievements and are determined to pursue their goals. But the reason is nothing more than being a general, a soldier and a deserter. The purpose of writing this paper is not absolute, but more to inspire children to have goals and work hard for them from an early age. Even if he doesn't want to be a general, after all, there are only a few generals. Only when a "general" becomes the "supreme commander" will there be more "generals". In the past, we always used the phrase "soldiers who don't want to be generals are not good soldiers" to encourage people to have ideals and fighting spirit and not to be confused. At the same time, we also use this sentence to criticize those who are "honest and well-behaved" (that is, those who have finally fulfilled their duties and will not hinder their dreams). But I didn't realize until today that we were all wrong-because only soldiers who don't want to be generals are good soldiers.

In this impetuous society, we have "soldiers who want to be generals" and "soldiers who don't want to be generals".

Think about it, don't those officials who care about the lives of the people for their political achievements just "want to be generals"? Don't those scholars and researchers who plagiarize papers and lie about scientific research results for academic titles all "want to be generals"? Why is the society so impetuous now? It is because there are too many people who want to be generals, and fewer people behave themselves in a consistent society. Everyone is vying to be a general, not a soldier. Can such a society not be impetuous Let's have fewer soldiers! The times need "soldiers"! ! ! Soldiers who don't want to be generals are good soldiers! ! ! ! ! !

Napoleon is often quoted as saying that soldiers who don't want to be generals are not good soldiers. Is that so? It seems that it is because I want to be a general that I will perform well, strive for success and keep making progress. But if he wants to be a general, flatter his leaders and compete with other comrades-in-arms, then he just stares at it, not his eyes. So, is he still a good soldier? By the same token, isn't an official who doesn't want to be a big official a good official? Thinking about how to be a good official every day?

Isn't a teacher who doesn't want to be a professor a good teacher? Obviously not. An old lecturer of Shanghai Jiaotong University was deeply loved by students and remained a lecturer until his death. Zhang Side, an old soldier, has always been a good example for our whole party to learn from. From this point of view, soldiers who don't want to be generals are not necessarily good soldiers. The key is to do your job well, and all walks of life will make achievements and realize their own value. Always thinking about climbing up is not a good thing.