This is a wonderful book, a book that is said to have left a handle, a shameful book, and a book that is generally considered to be Guo Moruo's greatest failure in his life. People are so contemptuous, so Gai's book is suspected of his "ingratiating" complex. Because Mao Zedong said that he liked Sanli and didn't like Du Fu, a wise man like Guo Moruo immediately wrote Li Bai and Du Fu, and in the book he really praised Li Bai and belittled Du Fu. Isn't this "please"?

In Li Bai and Du Fu, Guo Moruo took a clear stand and took a "one-sided" attitude, greatly praising Li Bai and extremely denouncing Du Fu. This seems to be Guo Moruo's problem. This has basically become a public opinion, and even young students who have not read Li Bai and Du Fu hold this view. It shows that the judgments of "buttering up" and "pleasing" are very strong.

Li Yimang, a lifelong personal friend, said that the motivation and background of Guo Moruo's writing Li Bai and Du Fu was: "The later Li Bai and Du Fu written by Guo was also based on Mao's remarks. I seem to have said that he is happy that Li Bai is not happy about Du Fu. " Li's impression of Guo Zhi's Li Bai and Du Fu is the same as that of most people: "Guo Lao is a Marxist, but some problems in that book are not analyzed by historical materialism, especially the statement that Du Fu belongs to the landlord class, which is very metaphysical. However, when the book mentioned Li Baisheng, he proved that Li Baisheng was breaking leaves, saying that the broken leaves were also from China at that time. Later, our diplomatic documents used his powerful textual research.

is this one of his contributions? In addition, there is a book "The Three Hundred Years Festival of Jiashen", and some people also pointed out many mistakes. Some people have made a fuss and defended Guo Lao's argument on the "Three Hundred Years Festival of Jiashen". In short, Guo Lao's book is that these two books are controversial, and now we can argue, and a hundred schools of thought contend, which is easier to handle as an academic issue. " (album of Guo Moruo's research and academic symposium, 2-21 pages, Culture and Art Publishing House). Because of the suspicion of "please", everyone greatly despises this book.

Another reason why people despise this book is that Guo Moruo completely smashed the memorial tablet of Du Fu, a "people's poet". Because people can't tolerate the collapse of the "sacred position" of the "people's poet", the followers of the "people's poet" are bound to violently attack Guo Moruo, and he has thus become a "sinner" culture.

is it really that simple? Is there another layer of "code" behind "curry favor with" and "please" that we have not yet interpreted? I have been trying to figure this out for many years, but I dare not easily agree with this statement. Now, I am willing to explain Guo Moruo's Li Bai and Du Fu with a special signal.

People all say that Li Bai and Du Fu is Guo Moruo's "worst" book, but I think it is Guo Moruo's best book. The good thing about it is that there are so many things that people can't agree, and there are many possibilities for interpretation. This interpretation of "borrowing strength and exerting strength", "rebellion is justified", "holding high the backbone" and "opposing slavery" is a kind of "possibility" that I first put forward. I wonder if it will be scolded by the foreigners.