How should matter, strategy, matter, existence, man, achievement and heaven be defined separately in materialist philosophy?
In fact, there are many schools of materialist philosophy, which are far apart, and even have different understandings of materialism. In this context, this question is actually a false question! Even as far as the theory of a certain school is concerned, it seems that no school has enough categories and concepts to accurately and strictly define "planning, things, existence, people, success and heaven", especially "people".
Philosophy is difficult. There is also a famous saying in aesthetics: (discussing) beauty is difficult. Knowing where the difficulty lies should be the yardstick for the introduction of philosophy.
It seems that the difficulty of "accurate and strict definition" can be bypassed if the above-mentioned daily words are abstracted in a specific context. Under this background, according to my philosophical point of view, things are objective reality, seeking is a rational subjective activity, things are an interactive process of subjective and objective reality initiated and tried to control by purposeful people, and existence is determined by people, who are value judges, rational subjective activists and people who make the subjective (purpose) visible to the objective and complete things. On this premise, the thesis of "Man proposes, God disposes" is analyzed below.
An analysis of the argument "Man proposes, God disposes": "Man proposes" is the background of the proposition, and "God disposes" is the proposition itself. The function of "seeking things" is to compare with the proposition itself "God disposes", and to produce the contrast image and emphasis tone of "man" and "heaven", without expressing the meaning of "seeking things".
"God disposes", that is, whether "man" can achieve his goal in the process of the interaction between subjective and objective reality which he initiated and tried to control purposefully depends on the whole objective reality and its strength.
In this way, the mistake of this proposition is clear at a glance.
Nothing is absolute.
"Man proposes, God disposes."
It is about people's subjective initiative and the objectivity of things.
Everything always has two sides and always interacts with each other.
Which side has the greatest strength is the decisive result.
Every reason has its result, but without a good reason, there will be a good result.
Because: evil causes are also at work; So, you can do this.
Look, good causes lead the direction of good results, and evil causes also lead the direction of bad results.
The result is good or evil, depending on the strength of both.
People's efforts, on the one hand, lead to success, but there are still
Other factors are leading the impossible direction.
In fact, the reason is often very simple, just because of people's delusions, prejudices,
Ignorance and persistence forget the truth.
It's as simple as that