“It’s a huge irony that I ended up being infamous and even forgotten, and that my previous success and fame were just a small way station on this journey. Now, I’m in a desperate situation. , The situation of entering the earth without any door is like the purgatory described by Dante.”

This passage reminds me of Zhang Ailing’s famous saying: “Be famous early”, and think about this again. Topic: Is it better for a person to become famous early? Or is it better to be a late bloomer?

Some people say that there is no age difference on the road to success, nor does it matter whether you are an early bloomer or a late bloomer, as long as you succeed and become famous.

Wrong!

In my opinion, it is better to be a late bloomer! As the saying goes, if you have a good meal, you are never afraid of being late!

Of course, I think so because of my thinking.

Zhang Ailing became famous early enough. She herself said that she should become famous early, but she fell into poverty after middle age. To a certain extent, the talent is gone. If the talent is still there, the legend should continue to be written.

The British writer Oscar Wilde became famous early enough, but he also ended up in jail in his middle age, and has suffered from poverty and illness ever since.

There are also many writers who became famous early, but then rested on their laurels.

What about late bloomers? Because I have never succeeded before, I have been practicing, experienced all kinds of things in the world, and I am used to seeing grudges and grudges. If I become famous after middle age or at the age of knowing my destiny or even later, I must have accumulated more and more, and the vitality of art will be more lasting.

Of course, this cannot be generalized. People who become famous early may also be at the peak and sublime throughout their lives. But alas, most of the time not.

People who become famous early are young and energetic, and it is easy for them to be unable to withstand the temptation and fall into all kinds of entertainment and fame and fortune. Or after seeing fame and fortune, you no longer have a strong desire and just want to return to the ordinary. For various reasons, you no longer have the strong determination to create.

What about those who became famous later? After searching high and low, going through ups and downs, he finally became famous all over the world in exchange for his strength. This is an inspiration and a compliment, and most people can continue to create miracles.

This is a big reason why I think it is better to grow up late than to grow up early. Another big reason is:

When a person is famous at a young age or becomes famous before the age of 35, With both fame and fortune, he is likely to be exhausted by all kinds of praises and praises. If he can make good use of the money and popularity gained from fame and make plans for his future life or, to put it more directly, for his retirement, it will be inevitable It is very good, otherwise most people would not be able to escape the situation of poverty and disease.

As for late bloomers, this is an age when they will not be easily tempted, and most people will endure fame and fortune. Of course, there are a few who can't stand it and squander all their fame and fortune in a few days. But most late bloomers have the potential to be virtuous and can spend their later years with honor, happiness, and freedom.

When will a person realize that it is better to be famous early or to be a late bloomer? Probably in his old age. In old age, people have difficulty moving, and their bodies and energy are weak. If they become famous at this time, will it end with a happy ending?

And if you become famous early and end up with a miserable life later in life, wouldn’t it be miserable? May I ask, do you want to be surrounded by people when you are young, or do you want to live a life where you are still admired by people when you have lost your appearance and charm when you are old?