Hello, Chinese public education is at your service.

1. Correctness of opinions

In the interview question and answer, opinions are the soul, and everything you answer is in vain. The correctness of the viewpoint is the basis of answering questions, so we must strengthen the study of the party's line, principles and policies, politics, current affairs and theory in order to make the answering questions correct. For example, the interview question: "You are the newly appointed deputy mayor, and you have arranged work for your subordinates according to the resolution of the town government. At the same time, several subordinates gave reasons for not implementing it at the meeting, which made you very embarrassed. What should you do?" The correct way is to listen to the different opinions of the masses with an open mind, and carefully investigate and understand the situation in all aspects. If the questions raised are really reasonable, they can not be implemented for the time being, and it is forbidden to emphasize face, be impulsive, and kill them with a stick. This is a big problem to correctly treat the opinions of the masses. If the answer is "just taking office, you should embody the characteristics of' three fires', and in order to establish your own prestige, you can exert pressure and not allow negative opinions", it is wrong.

2. Accuracy of key points

For each interview question, you should first understand the key points that should be grasped in answering, clearly explain the interview questions from several aspects, clear your mind when thinking and preparing, and make the key points accurate, unambiguous, wordy, uncomplicated, straightforward and focused. For example, the interview question: "When you, as a leading cadre, encounter a contradiction between the spirit of a superior instruction and the local actual situation, what will you do?" Three points can be made clear when thinking and preparing: First, we should seriously study and study the spirit of instructions from higher authorities, understand the essence, and control the policy well; Second, establish the overall concept, deploy the work, obey the overall situation, be consistent with the CPC Central Committee, and make orders to prohibit it; Third, if it is found that there are problems in the instructions of the higher authorities that do not conform to the actual situation of the local and local departments, suggestions for improvement and implementation can be put forward to the higher authorities.

3. Dialectical analysis

The answers to many interview questions require dialectical analysis, and the mind should be open and absolute. Most of them should be evaluated from a dialectical point of view to prevent one-sidedness and simplification in answering questions. For example, the interview question: "As the ancients said,' If you doubt people, you don't doubt people'. Do you adopt the view of' employing people without doubt' when you use subordinate cadres?" We should not simply affirm or deny this issue. Dialectical analysis should be made of the ancient aphorism, which has both its useful side and its disadvantages. "No doubt about employing people" embodies the spirit and style of full trust and bold use in employing people after examination, analysis and judgment, and should influence and inspire the users and urge them to produce the mental state of "a scholar dies as a confidant". However, it is not advisable to employ people completely without doubt, because the growth of the people used is influenced by various factors and constantly changes. However, the theory of "without doubt" will treat things as death, and it is easy to generalize and cover up the inferior with the superior, resulting in laissez-faire, ignoring the measures of use, training, education, inspection and supervision, which will lead to changes in the employed. Therefore, it is dialectical to employ people correctly without doubt.

4. Completeness of the answer

Everyone wants to answer questions perfectly and perfectly, so as not to miss the main points as much as possible, so as to improve their grades. If you want a satisfactory answer, you should be open-minded and thoughtful. Such as interview questions: "According to legend, there was a man named Liu Xiahui who stayed in a hotel for the night. Because of the sudden cold, a woman who stayed in the hotel was dying of cold. Liu held him in her arms and sat there until dawn. There was no indecent assault. Analyze the enlightenment of this story of' sitting still' to leading cadres in politics. " To answer this question, of course, the main reason is that leading cadres should have good conduct and decent style. But in addition to this, there are several inspirations for this story, such as being good at helping others, daring to break the customs, being firm in will, obeying the law, etc., which should be put forward, so as to answer the original intention of the examination questions more satisfactorily and reflect a candidate's rich thoughts and correct opinions on social problems and various situations.

5. The logicality of statements

One of the abilities required to be tested in the interview is the ability of logical thinking. In the preparation of thinking after hearing the interview questions, the logicality of thinking is required first, and then the logicality of statements. This logicality requires clear and coherent levels, close connection before and after, and consistent expressions. Answer according to this to conquer the examiner. For example, the interview question: "As a deputy, when studying problems with major leaders, you think your opinions are correct, but they are not adopted after being put forward. How do you deal with this situation?" When you are thinking, you should be clear about the following ideas: First, be fair to the public and treat it calmly; Second, we should comprehensively analyze the correctness and feasibility of our own opinions; Third, if you confirm that your opinion is feasible, you can further reflect the statement to the main leaders; Fourth, after reflecting the statement, it still can't get approval and support, and it can reserve opinions. If it is a major issue, it can be reflected to the superior. When answering, expand your own views step by step to make them interlocking, thus increasing the logic of the statement of questions and answers

6. Innovative opinions < P > When thinking and preparing for the interview, you should introduce new ideas with new ideas. Under the new situation, you should abandon the old inertia and put forward new ideas, which is more conducive to your success in answering questions and answers in the interview. For example, the interview question: "Why can some units' three heads are better than one Zhuge Liang', while others' three monks have no water to drink'. In the latter case, what should you do if you take office? " After listening to the topic, you can first briefly think about the experience of the former unit "surpassing Zhuge Liang", and then think about the solution of the latter unit according to the requirements of the new situation. For example: (1) find the root cause and stimulate the resultant force; (2) rational use of people, each according to his ability; (3) clear responsibilities, rewards and punishments according to the system; (4) Personnel allocation and posts creation, and introduction of competition mechanism. In this way, questions and answers are closely combined with the current situation, reflecting new ideas.

7. Theoretical profundity

Interviewing and answering questions have the characteristics of theoretical test, and answering questions should have a certain theoretical height. For example, answering questions should be based on the party's principles and policies, or national laws and regulations, or famous sayings, or specific case data, all of which require a certain theoretical foundation in order to better quote classics, comprehensively sublimate and demonstrate questions. For example, the interview question: "At present, there are different disputes about the' last elimination system' implemented by some units. What do you think of this employment measure?" The objective answer should be: "the last elimination system" is a transitional measure to the development of competition mechanism, which can be tried out; But it depends on the situation, not across the board. Besides, the "last elimination system" is not completely equivalent to the competition mechanism. It's not bad for a large-scale and large-number unit to implement the competition mechanism at first and then. If it is implemented in a small-scale unit with a small number of people, the effect may not be good, because it is true that some units have a small number of people, and almost all the staff have worked hard and achieved good results, even neck and neck. If it is implemented, it will cause panic and tense interpersonal relationships.

if you have any questions, you are welcome to ask the Chinese public education enterprises.