/p>

There was once a follower of Sun Yat-sen who committed suicide in front of Sun Yat-sen's mausoleum after his death. I think it is not advisable to say that this was a act of suicide. In addition, I think it is not advisable to commit suicide to become a benevolent person when there is no way out in front of the enemy. If this happens, I think we can't commit suicide even if we die, but we have to let the enemy survive. Maybe if we do this, our way of survival will appear. As reported in the newspaper: During the Nanjing Massacre, three thousand citizens were killed by three Japanese devils in a room, and only a few escaped. Because the others did not resist, I advocated that we should fight to the death with the enemy for justice. , cannot die in vain.

I think that as a person, you should have a path and a broad road, because you can travel all over the world with reason, but you can't move without reason. As long as your heart is in harmony with the way of heaven (the law of heaven), you will have your own path in the world. This is the most fundamental. As long as a person adheres to the principles of nature in his heart, the road to survival will be extremely broad.

2. "If a country has the Way, then one can be an official; if the country does not have the Way, then one can take care of it."

This saying of Confucius also makes sense. However, I think: if the state has justice, it will hold power for the people; if the state does not have justice, it will do righteous deeds for the people (such as opposing the brutal peasant uprisings in the past; the righteous deeds of Mao Zedong and Zhou Enlai for the revitalization of China in modern times; the staff in the focus interview work hard to achieve justice). In short, don't be passive about it.

3. "A gentleman wants to be slow in words but quick in deeds."

In my impression, a dull person is a person who has reason to speak out. If this is the case, then Can't be dull. When we do things that are moral, we can use various legitimate methods to explain the truth. We must be moral and reasonable, and we must also be eloquent to defend it. This eloquence needs to be impartial and impartial, not "over or under". Therefore, I think that "sluggishness" is a sign of inferiority, and it is better not to be like this. And it is not advisable to use clever words to make people "excessive".

I think Confucius’s words have been implemented by rulers in the past, and some have not been implemented: "When three people walk, they must have a teacher. Choose the good ones and follow them, and follow the bad ones." And change it". Confucius required himself in this way, and those who truly listened to his words should also do the same, even to Confucius. If there is something wrong in Confucius's remarks, it is also advisable to "choose the good ones and follow them, and change the bad ones" and treat them with loyalty and love, so as not to follow their faults and not punish them. Confucius was the first to say this, and also said: "Be benevolent and do not yield to the teacher." If those who come later do not follow his good deeds or do not correct his bad deeds and do not truly listen to his words, of course he will bear the responsibility.

4 "A benevolent person must be brave; a brave person does not have to be benevolent."

I think: a benevolent person must be brave. This is correct. And those who are merciless will not be brave. Because bravery is a word of praise, those who are not benevolent will not be brave. Behavior that appears to be brave is also cruelty. Because it is unkind, the external actions are not among the ones that are praised. The words that match this should also be derogatory. Therefore, it is not appropriate to use courage to describe those who are unkind.