given the same initial conditions to different people, different results will be obtained, which is determined by different ways of thinking of each person.
For example, playing cards is the same. Most people just play cards for the sake of playing cards, without considering anything else.
Yesterday, I heard the legendary female poker player Anne Duke's methodology about playing cards. It can be seen that she is not playing cards, but life.
The information you have in playing cards is incomplete. Unlike playing chess, every step can be recorded, and it can be resumed after the game. Playing cards can only make the best choice according to the current information, but the result is often unknown.
This is very similar to our life, where information is incomplete and we have to make a decision. One of Duke's thoughts on this is that decisions and results must be viewed separately, and decisions should be emphasized rather than results. On the contrary, we can't use the results to infer whether the decision is correct.
For example, before making an investment, we must think carefully to ensure that our decision is correct, at least under the current conditions. As for the results, it is time to verify.
Because talents and luck are intertwined, even the best talents and decisions may fail because of luck. We can only reduce risks and it is difficult to predict the results.
Life is full of knowledge, and this knowledge will only be given to those who are attentive and good at thinking.