Everyone who watches the ball must know Mr. Jing Yu. Mr. Jing Yu shines brilliantly in this media age with his unique expression style and sharp point of view. Even some fans will deliberately "black" Mr. Jingyu and say that he is a clown or something, but when I think about it carefully, I can't help asking myself, is Mr. Jingyu really talking nonsense?

Let me say my answer first, no.

Everyone knows that Teacher Jingyu is a fan of Curry, and some people have nicknamed him "Stephen Jingyu". Some people are arguing about who is the boss of the warriors, Curry or Durant, during the "Cosmic Brave" period. Most people think Durant is the leader of the Warriors, because Durant hit the key ball in the finals for two consecutive years and won FMVP at the same time. But Jing Yu insisted that Curry was the boss of the Warriors.

Basketball is a five-to-five team sport, not a 1v 1 one-on-one bullfight. A player's influence on the game can't be just one-on-one combat ability, but his influence on the whole team should be considered. Curry is the core of this team's tactics and the soul of the Warriors' cutting system. Without Curry, the warrior system would cease to exist, and there would be no so-called "universal courage".

In fact, this argument is very convincing and sufficient. Durant's role in that warrior is the finish line, which is, in the words of teacher Jing Yu, a "medium-distance singles stick", and Curry's running without the ball involves defense and frontal middle road pick-and-roll is the key to connecting teams.

Some people say that Mr. Jing Yu likes "black" Durant. I summed it up. Mr. Jing Yu's "black" Durant points are: poor physical fitness and poor endurance; Suffered a serious achilles tendon injury, always suspended in the regular season, no longer suitable for the core of team building; He has a bad reputation among the players and bears the stigma of "traitor". He joined the Golden State Warriors and won the championship. Now think about it, is there a problem with what Teacher Jing Yu said? Durant, as a player with a broken achilles tendon, refers to an athlete (such as Kobe Bryant) who suffered a major achilles tendon injury before. Is his condition declining and he always stops playing?

There was also a debate in a program of a news before. Who is better, Howard or Paul? Only Jing Yu thinks Howard is better, and all the other guests think Paul is better. Teacher Jing Yu said that Howard led the team to the finals, while Paul, as the leader of the team, never entered the regional finals. Some people will say that Mr. Jing Yu will only judge players according to their performance, not their performance on the court. On the court, Paul is obviously better. However, the core of competitive sports is achievement. If there is no achievement as a support, how to judge whether a player is excellent or not? And everyone's aesthetic preferences and preferences are different. Maybe A likes Kobe and B likes James. This is a personal preference and has nothing to do with the player's strength. If you consider the expressive force on the court, it will definitely be mixed with personal preferences, and honor and achievement are established facts and unshakable things. It is fair and convincing to judge the quality of players according to their hard work and honor.

What do you think Mr. Jing Yu is talking about? Please leave a message for discussion.