There is no need to dwell too much on the theoretical level when establishing an argument at the beginning. The argument must be logically clear and concise.

How to write the opening argument of a debate competition

The role of this link is to explain the topic of the debate, highlight the theme, and determine the point of view. It also provides theory and expansion for the subsequent attack and defense. If the defense is excellent and the helm is excellent, then the whole team will have an easier time.

Three-paragraph argument.

Part One - Theoretical tracing and explanation of concepts. At this time, we need theoretical guidance or evidence to give full play to the role of theory in practice, combine theory with debate topics, and play a role in The role of initiating new ideas and rectifying the source. But it should be clear that theory covers not only the theorems and laws that are generally recognized, but also the famous aphorisms of politicians, writers, and democrats.

In the second part, the value reality, the positions of both parties are established and supported by the theories of all parties. What plays an important role in the opening chapter is the affirmation and elaboration of the value of the position. If there is no value of its own, then the position It will appear vulnerable and the attack will appear weak. Therefore, it is even more important to highlight the value of your stance. The way to demonstrate the role of value is to use facts as a basis. Facts are shown to everyone or can be verified with words. Facts speak louder than words, and they are more convincing when expressed with charts, figures and words.

The third part is a comparison of the best. There are differences in the positions of the two sides of the debate, so there is naturally a kind of comparison. Comparison can highlight the major and minor, explain whether it exists or not, and support what should and should not be. Only by making comparison can you better demonstrate the necessity of the topic and better express your understanding of the topic. In the process of comparing the positions of both sides, find your own advantages and use your strengths to avoid weaknesses. There are many ways to compare. You can combine value and theory for analysis to compare the advantages of our position or the disadvantages of the other side.

The fourth part, social sublimation, is very necessary to combine the situation of contemporary society. It is also based on the characteristics of the above three parts and is related to the discussion of reality, so this part plays a decisive role. It is also the information that takes a lot of time to find at the beginning of a debate. Contacting society is a good practical evidence. At the same time, many social phenomena can be role models, warning bells, cases, templates, etc., which can trigger everyone's thinking and are also a good way to provide information for subsequent competitions.

The above four parts are the four main points that we divide the opening statement into. The four parts are interdependent and are an organic whole. They do not exist independently. They complement each other and have the same meaning. It works in this part of the opening chapter.