When it comes to papers, you must be familiar with it. There are many types of papers, including academic papers, graduation papers, degree papers, scientific papers and achievement papers. What kind of paper can be called an excellent paper? The following are six argumentative essays in junior high school that I have compiled, hoping to help you. Junior high school argumentative composition 1
In the face of honor, reason is a gate.
if you don't see me, some people hold an indifferent attitude after winning the honor; Others celebrate and regard honor as their capital to show off to others. I don't think the above two attitudes are desirable.
honor is a kind of reward through the efforts of yourself and others. Of course, you should be happy to get the honor, but don't get carried away. This honor includes both your own efforts and the sweat of others. Don't give all the credit to yourself. "Celebrate a lot" is even less desirable, which often makes people feel that they have made achievements, do not strive for progress, sleep on the merit sheet, and never get any honor from now on. The honor they got before has become a stumbling block on their way forward, and the boat of life they are driving has gone astray.
Being indifferent to honor is not the best way to treat honor, although it is more like a general than the previous one.
so how to treat honor correctly?
This reminds me of Pele, the king of soccer. When Pele scored a record of 1 goals, a reporter asked him which ball he was most satisfied with, and he replied, "Next". In the face of honor, Bailey is not indifferent and numb, and he is not carried away. His answer sparkled with the brilliance of reason, reflecting his humble quality. He will always be our role model.
Honor is temporary, but struggle is eternal. Junior high school argumentative composition 2
What is nature? Nature is a blue sea, vast grasslands, strong rivers and tall trees ... In our human world, these things may not be conspicuous, but every flower and grass has a very important revelation. Grass, indomitable spirit and unswerving endurance are exactly the spirit that we should learn never to give up.
Hydrangea, it looks like an ordinary flower, but when you look closer, you will see dozens of flowers, each of which looks exactly the same, and no one is particularly conspicuous. Every little flower should do its part, otherwise it will never win; If a small one of this hydrangea doesn't do its duty and grows casually, it is not a beautiful flower. We must learn from hydrangea's consistent heart, otherwise a perfect team will still lose without a consistent heart; In a perfect team, don't just ask for your own prominence, but ask for the team's prominence in order to win the real victory.
river water, as the saying goes, "a drop of water can pierce a stone." Tell us that "perseverance" is the foundation of success; The passage of water tells us that time is gone forever, so we should seize every minute and second.
Nature is always around us, so we should learn the secrets of nature with humility. Take care of your heart and treat it with a friend's attitude, and you will gradually find that it will give you back more precious things besides friendship. Junior high school argumentative composition 3
The pleasant winter vacation passed in a blink of an eye, and we ushered in a brand-new semester. In this new semester full of laughter, I will work hard to get into a middle school I like.
I have a problem that I am often absent-minded in class. Once in class, the teacher asked a difficult question. The classroom was silent and no one raised their hands. At this time, the teacher looked over at me and saw me at a glance. She shouted, "Chen Muzhi, you answer this question!" Seeing that I was motionless, the teacher raised his voice again and shouted sternly, "Chen Muzhi! I told you to hear it! " I just came to my senses and stood up and looked at the teacher blankly. "What are you looking at? There are words on my face!" As soon as the teacher's words fell, the students laughed with laughter. I stood there awkwardly, not knowing what to say. Of course, the teacher scolded me that day. I have been criticized a lot for this matter.
In order to get rid of this problem of mine, I adopted the methods of reward and punishment. How can I put it? For example, I am listening attentively to the teacher in class this day, so I can buy a lollipop to reward myself. On the contrary, if I am distracted in class again, I will punish myself for doing housework for a week. I want to buy an extract book, in which some good words and sentences and famous sayings are copied. I also need to develop the good habit of writing a diary every day, so that I can write my composition better and better!
forget the past, change yourself, come on! Junior high school argumentative essay 4
1. This is an argumentative essay. The theme of the full text is distinct, with far-reaching ideas, clear argumentation level and orderly structure. In the choice of argumentation materials, the author has a good grasp of anecdotes and historical allusions of celebrities at home and abroad, which shows his profound reading skills and cultural background. The last paragraph is a clever use of sentence arrangement, which implies historical facts and is very infectious in one go.
2. This is a wonderful argumentative paper. The author starts with the sentence "Take your time as a car" and puts forward the topic directly. Then explain the meaning and make people think. Transition is natural, and examples are typical. The level of demonstration is clear and the structure is clear. From the individual to the country, the discussion is profound and thought-provoking.
3. This argumentative paper has a clear point of view, and its inscription highlights its own point of view. In the main body, it demonstrates its own point of view by using argumentation methods such as quotation, example argumentation and reason argumentation, and it is a successful exercise.
4. This paper is an argumentative paper with a standard parallel structure. The full text consists of three sub-arguments: "Faith is a stone, knocking out a spark", "Faith is a fire, lighting the lamp of hope" and "Faith is a lamp, illuminating the road ahead", which is a metaphor and concise expression. The beginning and end coordinate the deduction, which makes the full text seamless.
5. The full text is fluent in charm, connecting and transiting naturally, without revealing the trace of axe and chisel; On the surface, it seems to be a comment on many talented people and beautiful women, but in fact it is precisely the baptism process of the author's soul; The writing style is concise and the feelings are sincere and profound, which is a rare article with literary talent and thought.
6. "Striving for victory" means constantly surpassing and achieving success with a competitive attitude. The author uses positive examples such as Tong Dizhou, Zhan Tianyou, Helen Keller and Liu Xiang, and negative examples such as Liu Chan and the emperor in the late Qing Dynasty to demonstrate the viewpoint that people should live up to expectations. The language is concise, vivid and infectious.
7. This argumentative essay wins by reason, with dialectical views, flexible language and free and smart colors. At the beginning of the article, I put forward my opinion: believing in myself does not mean being opinionated; Listening to opinions does not mean following suit. . Then explain why we should listen to other people's opinions. The language of the article is concise and focused; Proper quotation makes the center stand out; The questions at the end of the article are thought-provoking. If the title of this article can be changed to "Believe in yourself and others", the effect will be better.
8. Looking at the full text, the description is true and the reason is mixed, which not only pays attention to dialectics, but also has strong appeal.
9. This is an argumentative paper about setbacks, which comes straight to the point and puts forward the central argument in the form of rhetorical questions. The level of argumentation is clear, the structure is clear, which arouses readers' thinking, orderly, distinct and in-depth, and the end emphasizes the central argument again.
1. Reasoning is the foundation of argumentative writing. This article pays attention to "putting facts and making sense", expresses his thoughts and opinions from the reality of life, and puts forward that "fear life, don't let cicadas sing birds and fish fly beyond our poems, but exist around us!" The point of view is reasonable and convincing. The language is unpretentious, giving people a simple, smooth and frank aesthetic feeling.
11. This is a normative argumentative paper. The opening language is neat and concise. The discussion part is divided into two parts first, and the main use under the central sentence is to demonstrate with examples. The examples are typical and have different angles, which is very measured. The ending thought is positive and inspiring.
12. Harmony is a beautiful song. Harmony is a poem, deep and calm; Harmony inspires nature and harmony casts the world; Nature needs harmony and the world needs harmony; Harmony is a charm, a natural charm, and a humanistic charm ...
13. Caring is a lingering emotion, which "keeps cutting, but the reason is still chaotic"; But without caring, can people still be called people? This article talks about the past and the present, expressing a deep understanding of caring. Compared with the changes in the way people express their concern in ancient and modern times, the author shows his nostalgia for simple and innocent feelings.
14. The beauty of this argumentative paper lies in its novel conception. "We may never catch up with the people we admire and admire, but we can constantly surpass ourselves and be the best ourselves." Abundant examples are cited in the process of argumentation.
15. This argumentative paper is a very rare refutation paper. At first, the author puts forward some opinions passed down from mouth to mouth, and then refutes them through his own unique perspective and rich factual arguments. "Sowing and ploughing are not equal to harvesting". The author emphasizes the importance of foundation. It is an extremely rare masterpiece to discuss rationality, strength and restraint!
16. The title of this argumentative paper puts forward the topic of "the value of life". At the beginning, it uses a set of parallelism sentences to lead to the following, and the main body uses metaphor and examples to demonstrate it concretely and forcefully. At the end, it uses a set of parallelism sentences to echo the beginning, which is convincing and instructive.
17. The topic of this argumentative paper is very contemporary. This paper makes a calm and comprehensive comprehensive analysis around the view that "the old man falls to the ground to help him or not" which has recently troubled the public. The angle of consideration is also very thorough, and finally puts forward specific solutions from both his own and social morality. The style is profound and the argument is powerful. It is a rare masterpiece.
18. This argumentative paper starts with a topic, which is fully demonstrated. It uses demonstration methods such as example, contrast and metaphor. The argument is well-founded and logical. The article uses rhetorical questions many times, which arouses readers' interest in reading and stimulates people's thinking. At the end, it contains philosophy: it is also a kind of beauty to give up!
19. This argumentative paper has a clear point of view, and it comes straight to the point that "the key to what we do is cooperation". The author gives examples and makes sense when discussing. This paper discusses the importance of cooperation in both positive and negative aspects, especially the author's transition to nature. Finally, it discusses that learning should also pay attention to cooperation in combination with practice, so that it will last for a long time. Junior high school argumentative essay 5
Many students scratch their heads as soon as they get the essay topic, and the articles constructed after thinking hard for a long time are often criticized as worthless in the end. It is said that composition is difficult to write. Why? Let's start with the proposition/semi-proposition/material composition. To write a good composition, we should start with the examination of the questions. Quality education has been innovated, and the composition has been changed. A large group of people are calling for reform and reform. So the composition question was changed. Now, students often give a passage first, so that they can figure it out and make their own ideas, and then write their own articles. The merit of this approach is that the composition written by students through their own thinking and understanding of materials can largely represent the comprehensive level of this student. However, the phenomenon of digression and complete digression appears. A paragraph of text on a composition topic is often caused by a keyword. The sentences come from different sources, meaning and meaning to be expressed are different. Different people, reading the same topic, can read different meanings, and write a variety of articles, and the result is often defeated. When you look at the topic carefully, it seems that such a topic is open and divergent. In fact, it is similar to the original propositional composition, with a large scope and no real meaning. It is all in a circle, and no matter how you turn it, you can't turn it out. Students can't see it. They often get hot-headed at the sight of "giving full play to their own imagination and unlimited style" and jump into the nest foolishly. They really don't want the yellowbird to stay behind and wait for it.
that's how most digressions come about. The topic is customization, so there is no way to think about composition innovation and divergent thinking. Changing a coat and adding the phrase "unlimited style" is innovation or openness? I don't think so. Every flower enters every human eye. After writing a composition, you still have to pass the teacher's mark. As I said before, everyone has a different understanding of the composition questions, and different understandings have caused different standards for everyone. In the same composition, one person looks good, while the other looks worthless. In the previous proposition, it's ok, students' compositions are the same, and teachers don't have much room for selection, so it won't cause any criticism to tick the wrong words or anything. However, after the composition topic was opened, the responsibility of the teacher became heavier. We can't ask too much of teachers, after all, people are not machines, and their thinking can't be the same, so the essays evaluated are of course different. The key is whether the teacher is innovative or not. The composition topic is innovative, and you still use the old standard to measure the quality of a composition. How many articles will be strangled in your hand? After repeated blows, how many truly innovative students can remain? In this case, why not write some articles that are happy for both teachers and students? What is the standard of good or bad composition? Is it artistic value or ideological connotation? Is it the angle of materials, or is language more important? What kind of composition should be advocated and what kind of composition is the real innovation? Where is the innovation of composition? Educational reform should not be just the clamour of a group of naive and ignorant teachers, nor should it be just superficial things like literary youth. To dig into the bones and see what really imprisons people? In recent years, quality education, which has been booming, exists in name only, hasn't it taught us a lesson? Haven't the intellectuals in China got rid of those unrealistic fantasies? If we want to reform, we should reform the system, reform our thinking and reform our hearts. If you want to change, change the system, teachers and students! Teachers have problems, don't students? Why is it more and more difficult to write a composition? If you copy it, you will learn to imitate it, so even if you write it, it will be a romantic night.
It's not that such an article is bad. It may be relatively new at first, but when thousands of students from Qian Qian and China write these things together, it's chilling! What about our thinking? What about our cultural heritage? Can the expression of our inner feelings only stay in these ignorant and empty teenagers? How many new concept compositions have been held? As a result, the articles are more and more similar, more and more weak, more and more sickly, and more and more unintelligible! Jumping out of a circle and willingly entering another set, is our composition really innovative? Advocating rebellion and being unconventional is what we call innovation? How many of those "trendsetters" who flaunt their uniqueness and rebellious thoughts are really thinking and how many are grandstanding? When everyone's composition has become the base camp of decadence and depression, are we going to carry out another composition reform and return to the original? But everyone loves it.