Shakespeare famously said, "There are a thousand Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand audiences." Everyone's views on the same thing will vary from person to person. Point of view, my understanding is a "decoding" process in learning, which is indispensable in normal learning. At first, I thought that decoding was to pass on my understanding to others. But the copper mine tells us that it has a deeper meaning.

Decoding is not a simple "understanding", it is an active and subjective process. Problem-oriented, there is a perspective of not asking, so there are different views. This is the process of internal knowledge reconstruction, a creative process!

For example, "talking toys" focus on children's "what it says"; For his family, he cares about "what is this"; For toy engineers, what they care about is "how to achieve it". Take learning as an example. Some people care about what knowledge is passed on at the level of "children". When some people reach the level of "parents", they will summarize, examine and judge their knowledge. Some people have reached the level of "engineers" to observe, study and analyze knowledge.

Conversely, decoding determines the effect of our knowledge mastery. But time and energy are limited, and it is not a process. You need to decode any material, so you should decode it selectively, such as classic works, and read it often and innovate constantly.

I like a sentence by the English writer Sherlock Holmes: "You are watching, but I am observing". Observation is a process of asking questions and thinking, and there are methods to observe and think.

The suggestion of copper mining should first find not only the conclusion, but also the process. Think about how you came to this conclusion. Secondly, we should not only summarize, but also extend. After summing up, in which situation can you assume that thinking can still be used? You can read and look at people with an extended attitude. Third, we should not only compare similarities, but also compare differences. What are the differences in thinking? Usually, the brain prefers the familiar parts, but it is because of the differences that it is knowledgeable, original and discoverable.

This makes me find that questioning and decoding is actually a process of "integration of knowledge and action". We should be diligent in thinking, studying and understanding, so as to bid farewell to "stupidity".

Thinkers have no boundaries, and walkers have no boundaries. The mind of the thinker has no boundary constraints, and the journey of the walker has no boundary constraints. Similarly, there is no end to learning, how can there be no end? Think about learning "decoding" and you will understand.