Zhuang Zhou followed the art method, and people enjoyed fish. From the cognitive law, Zhuang Zhou's logical reasoning about man as a fish and fish as a man is purely sophistry, but this sophistry will not make people disgusted, because Zhuang Zhou looks at the world with an artistic mentality, which is a typical "empathy" role. Zhuang Zhou transplanted his happiness into the emotion of fish, and the emotion of fish set off Zhuang Zhou's happiness.

Both sides of the debate stick to the theme, but the debater's thinking is completely different. Hui Shi: According to the cognitive law, people and fish are two different creatures, so it is impossible for people to feel the joys and sorrows of fish.

Appreciation of Zhuangzi and Keiko's Tour of Haoliang Zhuangzi and Keiko's Tour of Haoliang are relaxed and poetic. Discuss Tao with strength and discuss Tao with technology; One is seeking truth, the other is seeking beauty; One is rigid, the other is detached; Let people smile and meditate for a long time after reading it.

This article is about two experts in debate, swimming together on a bridge in Haoshui, watching minnows swim freely, which aroused association and started a debate about whether people can know the happiness of fish. Although the topic is small, the purpose is great. Except for the first sentence, narrative language is used to explain the background of the story, and the whole story is in the form of dialogue. The method of attacking the shield with the spear of the child really deepens the debate.

Zhuang Zhou was sure that he could know the happiness of fish, but Hui Shi denied Zhuang Zhou's statement. Not to mention who is right or wrong in this debate, just the agile thinking and wise talk reflected by the two people in the debate makes people shocked and gives people an enjoyable and educational enjoyment.