Features of the 2017 National Examination Application Questions

What is the theme of this article? The title requires "water as a teacher". Should the theme be how people deal with the relationship with water? ?Not entirely. It is not about how to deal with the relationship with water in general, but about "taking water as our teacher", that is, learning from water. Then we must first understand the advantages of water and the spiritual essence behind it, that is: what are the things worth learning about water, and these things must have practical value, which also reflects the requirement of "connecting with reality" in the answer requirements. The article should point out what "taking water as a teacher" means. From the extraction and summary of the materials, it can be seen that the advantages of water are: water is everywhere, has various forms, is ever-changing, rains down everywhere, the sea is open to all rivers, and the complex is simplified, etc. The philosophy behind it is change, kindness, tolerance, complexity and simplicity. This coincides with the government's primary concept of "innovation" among the five major development concepts, is consistent with the truth-seeking and pragmatic work style, and is consistent with the requirement of rejuvenating the country through hard work.

The focus of the article is to demonstrate why it is necessary to "use water as a teacher" and to analyze the necessity and urgency of change, innovation and other contents. The analysis points can be refined based on the materials, or you can choose your own angle. Sub-arguments also need to be demonstrated, and the method of argumentation is a combination of theoretical argumentation and factual argumentation. Theoretical arguments can use citation theories, hypothetical arguments, analogical arguments, positive and negative arguments, categorical syllogisms, disjunctive syllogisms, hypothetical syllogisms, etc. Factual arguments can use facts, examples or data; the sources of examples can be partly extracted from materials, and partly based on one's own knowledge reserves and actual examples. When giving examples, attention should be paid to the pertinence, typicality and adequacy of the examples, and the examples should be specific. The so-called pertinence of examples means that the examples must be closely related to the content to be demonstrated; the so-called typicality mainly means that the examples cited must have a certain degree of popularity and influence. You cannot just cite your own examples. If you really want to cite your own examples, Can be placed after typical cases. The so-called sufficiency of examples means that "one example does not prove it." It often takes multiple typical examples to fully demonstrate an argument. The so-called specific examples mean that we should not just talk about some general facts, but have specific examples, for example, what the United States did specifically in a certain aspect, what Germany did specifically. In the process of giving these examples, it is best to proceed according to dimensions such as time and space to appear more organized. For example, there are examples of water as a teacher in history, examples of water as a teacher today, foreign examples, and examples in our country. .

The article also needs to clearly explain how to "use water as our teacher". Otherwise, just talking about "using water as our teacher" as a countermeasure is empty talk. For example, what is the specific content of innovation? What are the means of innovation? Who relies on innovation? These perspectives can all be explained clearly.

From the overall logic of the article, the entire article must have the macro logic of argument-argument-argument and what-why-how. At the level of "what it is", it can be revealed from phenomenon to essence, from the characteristics of water to the spiritual essence of water, and the connotation of using water as a teacher. At the "why" level, it can be analyzed from dimensions such as necessity and urgency, but it is necessary to analyze why we should learn these things based on the spiritual connotation of water, and use these as teachers. At the "how to do" level, there must also be logic, which can specify what to do, who will do it, how to do it, etc.

In short, we need to analyze and demonstrate around the specific spiritual connotation and core connotation of water, and we cannot just talk about why we should "use water as our teacher" or how to "use water as our teacher". The entire article must have a clear theme, clear arguments, strong arguments, complete and reasonable structure, and vivid and logical language.