“A person who can read all books is afraid that he can’t do anything.” This famous saying means that a person who can read all books can do anything. Then, if that person reads bad books and becomes addicted to them, he may behave badly.

Bishgaqiu in Gogol's "Dead Ghosts" reads everything. He is not a learned man, but a fool who lacks appreciation; Zhu Zeman in "Zhuangzi: Lie Yuguan", He learned a special dragon-killing technique. In fact, there were no dragons to kill anywhere. Only then did he realize that there were no dragons in the world, and his skills were useless. In this way, if you open the book indiscriminately, you will always get half the result with half the effort and do more harm than good!

Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining, 'digging for gold from the sand.'"

Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; eating red dates is harmful to teeth; taking medicine is good for the body, but it also has side effects.

The British writer Fielding said: "Bad books are like bad friends, they may kill you." If you understand "opening a book is beneficial" one-sidedly, you can read all books, but not all books. It’s a choice, regardless of the content, it’s beneficial to read it, but that’s not right! We must learn a skill to choose the most valuable and enlightening books that are suitable for ourselves to read.

So, I hope everyone will remember that opening a book may not be beneficial, because no one is perfect. No book is entirely correct.

Proposition: Opening a book is beneficial

In this information-based world, reading is one of the only ways for us to acquire knowledge. Reading more can broaden our knowledge and enrich our literary accomplishment, which will be of great help to our future speaking and writing.

Our knowledge is like a reservoir. A large amount of reading enables our reservoir to store a large amount of knowledge. While we are replenishing knowledge, knowledge is constantly leaking out. At this time, if we stop reading or read fewer books, the water in the reservoir will soon dry up. Only through continuous and rich extracurricular reading can we enrich our knowledge without losing a lot of it. A large amount of knowledge can provide you with enough material for your composition, otherwise you would only be able to write a few unambiguous and repetitive sentences after holding it for a long time.

------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------

The reason why opening a book is beneficial is Song Taizu He once said: "As long as you study, there will always be benefits." Since then, "opening a book is beneficial" has become an idiom.

You may want to ask, why do you want to talk about this? The reason is very simple, the key is " The word "always" means that there are always benefits, not just benefits. Therefore, to say that opening a book is beneficial, what needs to be demonstrated is that reading is beneficial, not that reading is harmless. (Don't be entangled in this by the negative side. Otherwise, you will definitely lose. You will understand the reason after reading it)

First of all, good books are beneficial, everyone knows this. So what needs to be demonstrated is: whether the so-called bad books have it What about some of your own benefits? As for the benefits of reading, it can be as big as making people realize their mistakes, change their past mistakes, move towards a bright road, and achieve success; it can be as small as learning several writing methods, a few words, and even understanding. A few words. These are the benefits of reading, which are undeniable. Therefore, we can deduce a few points to prove that bad books also have some benefits:

First, as long as it is called a bad book, It will definitely affect people's character and lead them to go astray. But please think about it, if those bad books cannot create a certain resonance with readers and make people deeply read, then how can such a result be caused? If this The structure and layout of the book, the way of expression, the description of ideas, the language and so on are all mediocre.

It is not even as good as an ordinary "living account"-like composition, so how can it resonate with readers? So no matter how bad it is, you can at least learn some writing methods from the so-called bad books, and no matter how bad it is, you can still know a few words. Can this be said to be useless?

Secondly, no matter how bad it is, Whether a book is a good book or not is judged based on whether the book has more advantages than disadvantages or more disadvantages than advantages. In other words, bad books also have certain benefits.

Thirdly, Laozi in ancient China has a view : Everything has its two sides. Since bad books are harmful, they must have their benefits.

Fourthly, maybe you want to say: "Suppose there is a bad book with unsightly content and a comprehensive layout of the article. Errors, the whole article is filled with wrong sentences, typos, and typos..." until there is no merit left. But have you ever thought about it, even if this kind of book exists, can anyone understand it? Will they read it?~~~ Since not If you know how to read, then even the premise of "opening the book" is gone, how can you talk about whether opening the book is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can name a bunch of people who have become corrupted, crazy, and committed crimes because of reading. Example. So what does this mean? It can only mean that the person who reads the book has a wrong mentality. That is a mentality problem and cannot be blamed on the book. Could it be that if someone uses a knife to kill people, can it be blamed on the bad knife?< /p>

Therefore, as long as you read, there will be benefits, no matter big or small. Therefore, it can be inferred that "opening the book is beneficial" is definitely true.

As for "opening the book may not be beneficial" , is a neutral word, half of it (beneficial) is correct, but the other half - it is unhelpful to open the book, there is a problem: unhelpful, not harmful. Just like a car driving on the road, it does not fly like an airplane. Blue sky, can it be said that it is burrowing into the earth? If the argument is "opening the book is harmful", then based on some of the arguments just made, it can naturally be established, but it would be wrong to say "unhelpful". So, in On this issue, the opposing side's argument is only half correct. (And this half is still the positive argument.) The reason why Wo Lai tells you how to debate well and open a book is beneficial is that Song Taizu said: "As long as you study, there will always be benefits." Since then, "opening a book is beneficial" has become an idiom.

You may want to ask, why do we say this? The reason is very simple, the key lies in the word "total"... This means that there will always be benefits, and It’s not just beneficial. Therefore, to say that opening a book is beneficial, what needs to be demonstrated is that reading is beneficial, not that reading is harmless. (Don’t be entangled by the opposite party. Otherwise, you will definitely lose. You will understand the reason after reading it) < /p>

First of all, everyone knows that good books are beneficial. So what needs to be demonstrated is: Do so-called bad books have some benefits of their own? In terms of the benefits of reading, it is very powerful. It can be as big as making people realize themselves, change their past mistakes, walk towards a bright road, and achieve success; it can be as small as learning a few writing methods, a few words, and even knowing a few words. These are all for reading.

The benefits are undeniable. Therefore, we can deduce several points to prove that bad books also have some benefits:

First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will definitely affect people’s character and make them It leads to the wrong path. But please think about it, if those bad books cannot create a certain resonance with readers and make people get deeper into them, then how can it lead to such results? If the structure, layout, expression, and conception of this book The description, language, etc. are all mediocre,

It is not even as good as an ordinary "running account"-like composition, so how can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad it is, In the so-called bad books, you can at least learn some writing methods, and even if you are not good at it, you can still know a few words. Can this be said to be useless?

Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book, it is based on Judge whether the book does more good than harm or does more harm than good. In other words, a bad book also has certain benefits.

Thirdly, Laozi in ancient my country had a view: Everything has its two sides. Since If a bad book is harmful, then it must have its benefits.

Fourthly, you may want to say: "Suppose there is a bad book, the content is unsightly, the layout of the article is completely wrong, and the article is full of wrong sentences and typos." ....." Until there is no advantage to be found. But have you ever thought about it, even if this kind of book exists, can anyone understand it? Will anyone read it?~~~ Since you can't read it, then you can't even "open the book" If this premise is gone, how can we talk about whether opening books is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of people who have become depraved, crazy, and committed crimes because of reading. So what does this mean? ?It can only mean that the person who reads the book has a wrong mentality. That is a mentality problem and cannot be blamed on the book. Could it be that if someone takes a knife to kill people, can it be blamed on the bad knife?

Therefore, as long as Reading is beneficial, no matter big or small. So it can be inferred that "opening a book is beneficial" is definitely true.

As for "opening a book may not be beneficial", it is a neutral word, half of it (beneficial) is right, but the other half is that it is useless to open the book. There is a problem: it is useless, not harmful. Just like a car driving on the road, it does not fly into the blue sky like an airplane, can it be said that it is drilling? Really? If the argument is "opening the book is harmful", then based on some of the arguments just made, it can naturally be established, but it would be wrong to say "unhelpful". Therefore, on this issue, the opposition's arguments are only That's half right. (And this half is the affirmative's argument).

Since the affirmative's forum is definitely true, but the negative's argument is only half true, then what other reason is there to argue? It's obviously the affirmative's argument. In an invincible position!

People often say: "Opening a book is beneficial, and reading is beneficial." However, upon closer inspection, this statement is not entirely correct. If we are interested in every book, then "opening the book is beneficial" may not be beneficial.

Nowadays students may like to read novels and books about martial arts and romance, sometimes to the point where they forget about food and sleep, and can’t put down the books. Once they are obsessed with reading a book, they will become obsessed with it, and they will only focus on it in class. If you are thinking about books but not studying, your grades will plummet. There are also people who are attracted by some plots in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes turn to the path of crime. Isn’t this reading a book that is harming yourself? This is just the first layer of “opening the book is not necessarily beneficial”: opening the book is not necessarily beneficial. There is also a second level.

The second is that when we read books, we must have choices. Don’t read books that are unhealthy and won’t help us much. If you want to read, read some books that are good for our physical and mental health, and helpful for our study and life. Such books are good books. As long as you read good books, you will not ruin yourself. Some people compare books to friends. If you read a good book, you will make good friends, and you will make progress; if you read a bad book, you will certainly make bad friends, and you will regress. Because those who are close to vermilion are red, and those who are close to ink are black! Therefore, only reading good books will be beneficial to you. Therefore, my point is: opening the book is not necessarily beneficial. I sincerely hope that every student can have a choice in reading. Don't lead yourself astray and ruin your life just because you read the wrong book.

I don’t think opening the book is necessarily beneficial. It is true that reading can increase people's knowledge, cultivate their temperament, and cultivate their body and mind, but "opening the book" is only a necessary condition for "benefit", not a sufficient condition.

Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said: "Books are like medicine, and reading them well can cure stupidity."

"Since books are medicine, they have two functions: one is good medicine, which can cure diseases; the other is poison, which can kill people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 1920s, many people read Hitler's "Mein Kampf" ”, which can be regarded as Hitler’s burial object due to its bad influence. “Bad books are like bad friends, they may kill you.” It is not true at all. Some students are now obsessed with martial arts or romance. Novels, reading those weird books all day long, and "throwing" homework aside, leading to a continuous decline in academic performance, and ultimately resulting in nothing but "opening" such a book. Is it “beneficial”? “A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber. "Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open a book depends on what kind of book to open.

A philosopher once said that people who can take in necessary nutrients are healthier than people who eat a lot. At the same time, real scholars often They are not people who read books when they see them, but people who know how to read. Some people read books without thinking seriously, and just flip through them casually. Some people read books that are not suitable for them, and some people even read them out of curiosity. To read, I would like to ask, what is the benefit of such "opening the book"?

The idiom "opening the book is beneficial" naturally has its positive meaning as an emphasis on the importance of reading, but if it is used as a The assertion that "opening the book" is "beneficial" is inappropriate.

"People who can read books are afraid that they can't do anything." "This famous saying means that a person who reads all kinds of books can do anything. So, if that person reads bad books and becomes addicted to them, he may behave badly.

The result Bishgaqiu in Goli's "Dead Ghosts" read everything. He is not a learned man, but a fool who lacks appreciation; Zhu Zeman in "Zhuangzi: Lie Yuguan", he learned a special killing skill. As for dragon skills, there is actually no place to kill dragons. Only then did he realize that there are no dragons in the world, and their skills are useless. In this way, if you open the book indiscriminately, you will get half the result with half the effort and do more harm than good.

< p>Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining, 'digging for gold in the sand.'"

Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; eating red dates is harmful to the teeth; taking medicine is good for the body, but there are also some. Side effects.

British writer Fielding said: “Bad books are like bad friends, they may kill you. "If one-sided understanding of "opening a book is beneficial" means that all books can be read without choosing or choosing, regardless of the content, reading will be beneficial, which is not true! We must learn a skill to choose the most valuable and insightful books that are suitable for ourselves to read. Books are beneficial.

So I think opening a book may not be beneficial.