Title: The person who is ink is not necessarily red, the person who is near the ink is black\x0d\ \x0d\\x0d\ The topic of whether the ink is black or not has been discussed by countless people. Most people think it is black, and some people think it is black. Some people have taken a different approach and come to a truth that is not necessarily black. \x0d\\x0d\ I think the key lies in the word "black" or "black". Some people's so-called closeness means closeness from beginning to end. Long-term communication and communication will inevitably have the influence of mutual reference and learning. This is almost the instinct of human beings. Of course, there are situations where two people get along with each other and are very different in all aspects, but do not affect each other. Then one of them must be very principled and unwilling to impose his own will on others. This kind of relationship generally does not last too long. Because there is no spiritual communication between individuals, the result is that they eventually part ways. Some people will definitely say that there are cases where this kind of relationship can last for a long time, but most of them are caused by material needs. Without communication on the spiritual level, how can we talk about being close? \x0d\\x0d\ There is another situation that is ridiculous. In order to prove that those who are close to Mohism are not necessarily evil, someone deliberately comes into contact with another person who is obviously different. After a certain period of time, no one is affected, so someone becomes high Huh, those who are close to ink are not necessarily black. This is like wearing rubber gloves to wash dishes. Of course, your hands will not be hurt, and your hands will not even get wet. \x0d\\x0d\The so-called closeness should mean communication on a spiritual level. Proximity does not refer to physical distance, but to the interweaving of concepts between individuals. There is only a moment of collision of ideas. If the ideas do not agree, they will separate and go their own ways. This is not close. If there is a resonance between the ideas, then the subsequent exchanges will definitely lead to new thinking. This is close. The near will inevitably evolve. \x0d\\x0d\ There are also situations where the proximity between individuals only exists at a certain level, and only at this level can ideas be exchanged. In this way, it will be close to vermilion but not red, and close to ink but not black. There are many allusions throughout the ages to prove this. Again, the exchange of ideas will inevitably lead to evolution. \x0d\\x0d\ The so-called proximity in those allusions only exists and is one-sided, or both parties use proximity to obtain something for a certain purpose. To give a simple example, some prisoners released from prison have since changed their minds and no longer do evil; some are still stubborn. To put it simply, those who turn back are those who have good intentions, so they can accept those good things and blend them with their own ideas. As for those who are impenitent, they block all the persuasion from their hearts, and even pretend to accept it, but in the end there is no change in their hearts. Others may have accepted it with an open mind, but in the end committed another mistake due to poor self-control. This is a typical example. Contact with good people, accept the good things and change them. After being released from prison, you will be exposed to bad things and change again. \x0d\\x0d\ 　　 "Prince Shaofu Zhi" by Fu Xuan of Jin Dynasty: "Therefore, those who are close to vermilion are red, and those who are close to ink are black; if the sound is harmonious, the sound will be clear, and if the shape is straight, the impact will be straight." The ancients do not deceive me. \x0d\Those who are close to vermillion are red, and those who are close to ink are black." This is the famous saying of Confucius, a great scholar, which has been regarded as truth for thousands of years. I don't think so. Those who are ink are not necessarily black. "\x0d\The world-famous writer Mr. Lu Xun is a very good example. Mr. Lu Xun was born in a feudal landlord family, but he was very sympathetic to the working people when he was a boy, and did not bully the people like other rich people. As an adult He used his pen instead of his gun to deeply reveal the ugly face of feudal society. In fact, there are many people like Mr. Lu Xun in the world. Those who are close to the ink may not be black! It is difficult to change. Even if the people around you are all Zhu Zhe, but you do not learn from them, you will become worse and worse as you learn from them. So what use is Zhu Zhe to you? After hearing this, do you still believe that " "Those who are close to vermilion are red, and those who are close to ink are black"?