Brother Kang Yong likes this debate topic very much, because the unpopular word "virtue" has become a topic in the popular "Qi Pa Shuo"; I also like this debate topic because I often can't figure out the first half of the sentence: Should I cause trouble to others?

Deep in my heart, I am very resistant to causing trouble to others (probably related to family education). Whether it is a stranger or a family member, I don't want to "trouble" others if I can do it myself, so I am always cautious and keep a distance and humility from many people. Maybe this is also a reason why I am not very good at "expanding" my network, haha.

In-depth analysis of why I don’t want to cause trouble to others. There are two reasons. First, I pay great attention to other people’s feelings and whether they are comfortable, and then I feel uncomfortable when I think that others may be uncomfortable. Comfortable, with the presence of others in my heart; the second level is to pay attention to other people's opinions of myself. When you trouble others, how others view you and evaluate you becomes very important. In the final analysis, this is also very focused on self-expression, because I hope that in What others get is the evaluation of "I am a very independent and capable person", so try not to cause trouble to others.

Therefore, my point of view on this debate is that "not causing trouble to others" is a virtue, it is independence, self-control and respect for others, but it is also stupid. It is stupid because it does not understand that "favor is "Trouble comes out of it", the fool is not understanding that "causing trouble for others is essentially a kind of cooperation", the fool is "too self-centered".

The weird contestants in this issue are talking about each other:

Opinion: When people get along with each other in daily life, many times our friendship and our bonds are through mutual exchanges. Trouble is solved by each other, and each other's troubles are built up.

This point of view was put forward by Xinqiwa. Later, Zhengfang repeatedly used different terms to discuss it:

Ma Weiwei translated this point of view in another way. She said:

I think Hu Jianbiao said it better. He said:

Ma Dong even specifically said that the two societies are Japan and China:

Hahahaha!

Viewpoint: Not causing trouble to others is the mother of all virtues and the foundation of all virtues.

Argument: She said that honesty and humility are well-known virtues, and the goal of these virtues is "not to cause trouble to others."

Example argument:

Baby Rujing’s argumentation method is very interesting. Although the advantages sound far-fetched, there is nothing wrong with it! Put the point into a well-known argument that does not require proof, such as "honesty is a virtue", and then just prove that "honesty also means not causing trouble to others", then "not causing trouble to others" is also a virtue. If you classify points that are recognized and do not require argumentation as a subset of your own opinions, your own opinions will also be valid. Just as she said, "honesty" is actually a subset of "not causing trouble to others."

1. Not causing trouble to others is an advantage, not a virtue. The essence of virtue is a social contract;

2. Giving or not causing trouble to others is a lack of ability:

This argument is absolutely venomous and has turned many people, including me, into The inner struggle of "about causing trouble to others" describes it. Of course we don't want to cause trouble to others, let alone others to cause trouble to ourselves, but when we are in trouble, we very much pray for others to help solve the trouble.

In response to Ma Weiwei’s point of view that “not causing trouble to others is a lack of ability”, Cai Kangyong dismissed it with questions. Let me restore the scene below so that everyone can experience the “superior” way of speaking:

Tsai Kangyong comes from the right side, and his surprise attack returns the view that not causing trouble to others is a virtue.

1. He believes that "not causing trouble to others" is essentially a form of collaboration. I have caused trouble for you, and you have caused trouble for me. In essence, we have completed collaboration;

2. There are already many virtues in the list. Be careful when adding “not causing trouble to others”, because it may not be in line with the basic wisdom of human society, because there is a basic wisdom in human society. The most important thing is to "collaborate" and "learn to ask for help."

Finally, Luo Pang ended his closing argument with two very wonderful contrasting moments, praise, praise, praise!

Think about why you are so afraid of “causing trouble for others”. Most of the time, it’s because you don’t know how to “ask for help” or “collaborate”. To a large extent, it’s because your parents and other older generations also taught you the same way. Ours, if you now think that "causing trouble for others" is actually a kind of collaboration and a favor, then go ahead and "trouble" boldly; if you still think that "not causing trouble for others" is a virtue, then You need to be more independent and self-controlled. It depends on how you recognize, choose and do it!