1. What is the font of forensic documents? The most significant change between the new version and the old version is to unify the original judicial expertise opinion and the judicial expertise inspection report into a judicial expertise opinion, which is also in line with the revised General Principles of Judicial Expertise Procedure. Article 34 of the old General Principles of Judicial Appraisal Procedure stipulates that "judicial appraisal documents include judicial appraisal opinions and judicial appraisal inspection reports." Article 36 of the new General Rules for Judicial Appraisal Procedure stipulates that "judicial appraisal institutions and judicial appraisers shall make judicial appraisal opinions in a unified text format". In addition, the format of the judicial authentication documents released this time has also changed greatly. Article 3 of the Notice of the Ministry of Justice on Printing and Distributing Sum issued on June 5438+065438+1 October, 2007 stipulates that "a judicial appraisal opinion is a document issued by a judicial appraisal institution and a judicial appraiser to record the professional judgment of the judicial appraiser after checking and appraising the appraisal materials provided by the client, which generally includes the title, number, basic information and information. . Article 5 stipulates: "A judicial authentication document generally consists of a cover, a text and an annex. "According to the latest version of the Notice of the Ministry of Justice on Printing and Distributing the Format of Judicial Appraisal Documents, the format of judicial appraisal opinions issued by the Ministry of Justice is standardized, including title, number, basic information, basic case, data summary, inspection process, analysis, appraisal opinions, attachments, signatures, etc. It can be seen that the format of the new document is different from the old one: 1. The "attachment" in the old version of the document is independent of the main text, while the new version of the judicial expertise opinion contains the "attachment" in the main text. 2, the new version of the "judicial expertise opinion" no longer contains "notes". (The contents that need to be explained in the old version of "judicial authentication documents" can be explained in the notes. "(3) In the text of the new version of the judicial expertise opinion, the" information summary "was added, and the" case summary "was changed to" basic case "and the" inspection process "was changed to" appraisal process ". The cover format of the new and old versions of judicial authentication documents remains basically unchanged, and the name of the judicial authentication institution and the license number of judicial authentication are indicated on the cover; The second letter States the statement, the address and contact telephone number of the judicial authentication institution. However, the contents of the statement in the second seal have changed greatly, as follows: 1. The article 1 in the second seal of the new version of the judicial expertise opinion combines the contents of the second and the second half of the third in the old version of the second seal and modifies the text. In addition, the emphasis is on judicial authentication institutions, not just judicial appraisers. 2. The contents in Article 3 of the second cover of the new version of the judicial expertise opinion are basically the same as those in Article 4 of the old version. 3. Articles 2 and 4 of the second cover of the new version of the judicial expertise opinion are added. Article 2 emphasizes that "whether the judicial expertise opinion is used as the basis for deciding the case or ascertaining the facts depends on the examination and judgment of the case-handling organ, and judicial expertise institutions and judicial appraisers have no right to interfere." Article 4 emphasizes that "expert opinions belong to expert opinions. If the parties have any objections to the appraisal opinions, they shall solve them through cross-examination in court or by applying for re-appraisal or supplementary appraisal. "This is also in line with the revised General Principles of Judicial Appraisal Procedure. In the old version of the Specification for Judicial Appraisal Documents, the title of the judicial appraisal opinion requires the name of the judicial appraisal institution and the entrusted appraisal matters; In the new version of the judicial appraisal opinion, the title is the name of the judicial appraisal institution, so we can see that the entrusted appraisal matters in the title of the new version of the judicial appraisal opinion are uniformly replaced by the judicial appraisal opinion. In the old version of the specification of judicial authentication documents, the "number" requires the abbreviation, year, specialty abbreviation, document nature abbreviation and serial number of the judicial authentication institution. The new version of the Judicial Appraisal Opinion does not explain this. In the old version of the specification of judicial authentication documents, the "basic information" requires that the client, the entrusted authentication items, the date of acceptance, the authentication materials, the authentication date, the authentication place, the personnel present, the authenticated person, etc. be specified. The appraisal data shall objectively state the inspection data and appraisal data provided by the entrusting party, and indicate the source of the appraisal data. In the new version of the judicial expertise opinion, the "basic situation" requires a brief description of the client, the entrusted matters, the date of acceptance, and the appraisal materials. Compared with the old version, the new version of "Basic Information" no longer emphasizes the identification date, identification place, people present, and the identified person. Basic case (the old version is the summary of the case) In the old version of the judicial expertise document specification, the "summary of the case" requires a brief description of the cases involved in the entrusted appraisal; The new version of the Judicial Appraisal Opinion does not explain this. However, literally, it should be consistent with the old version. " "Data Summary" and "Data Summary" are new contents in the new version of judicial expertise documents. According to the instructions, the identification data related to the identification items should be extracted, such as the medical history summary of forensic identification. Appraisal process (the old version is the inspection process) In the old version of the judicial appraisal document specification, the "inspection process" requires that the implementation process and scientific basis of appraisal be stated, including the treatment of inspection materials, appraisal procedures, technical methods, technical standards and technical specifications used; In the new version of judicial expertise opinion, "expertise process" requires an objective, detailed and orderly description of the process of expertise activities, including personnel, time, place, content and methods, selection and use of expertise materials, technical standards, norms or methods adopted, instruments, equipment, methods and main results used in inspection, inspection and testing, etc. Thus, the "appraisal process" of the new version of the judicial appraisal opinion requires not only the contents of the previous version of the "inspection process", but also the information of the original personnel, time, place and main results in the "basic situation" of the old version of the appraisal document. In addition, the selection and use of identification materials are emphasized. The "analysis description" in the old version of the "Specification for Judicial Appraisal Documents" requires to state the process of analyzing, identifying and judging the appraisal opinions according to the appraisal materials and inspection results. The cited materials shall indicate the source; The "analysis description" in the new version of the judicial expertise opinion requires that the process of identification, judgment, comprehensive analysis and logical reasoning of the appraiser on the appraisal materials, inspection and test results, appraisal standards and opinions should be elaborated in detail. Requirements are scientific and logical. At this point, the two versions are basically the same. The requirements for "identification" in the old version of "Specification for Judicial Identification Documents" should be clear, specific, standardized, targeted and applicable; There is no explanation of "expert opinion" in the new edition of judicial expert opinion. In the old version of the Specification for Judicial Appraisal Documents, the judicial appraiser is required to sign or seal, and indicate the number of the judicial appraiser's practice certificate, affix the special seal for judicial appraisal of the judicial appraisal institution, and indicate the date of making the document; In the new version of judicial authentication documents, it is required to have the signature of the judicial appraiser (printed text and autograph), the certificate number of our appraiser's practice certificate, the special seal for judicial authentication of judicial authentication institutions and the date of document production. Compared with the old version, the new version has removed the title of "signature". Secondly, it is emphasized that the signature of the judicial appraiser is a printed text, and the seal of the appraiser is no longer valid.