Legal analysis
Effective. In civil acts such as labor relations, when signing a labor contract, the signatures of the parties are all expressions of their legal consent, and they should be responsible for the possible legal consequences of their actions. I am authorized to sign the contract and can sign it on my behalf. If the authorized signing agent violates the agreement in the future, I will also bear the responsibility for breach of contract, and the signing agent will not bear any responsibility. To conclude a contract, the parties shall have corresponding capacity for civil rights and capacity for civil conduct. The parties may entrust an agent to conclude a contract according to law. In civil litigation such as labor relations, whether the labor contract is signed for the first time or renewed, the signature of the parties is an expression of their legal consent and acceptance of the rights and obligations of the contract. The signatory shall be responsible for the possible legal consequences of his actions. If someone else signs the contract, it should be entrusted by the parties in writing or ratified afterwards, otherwise, the contract is not legally binding on the parties. Because sometimes the person signing the contract is actually authorized, in this case, as long as the person signing the contract is a person with full capacity for civil conduct and also signs the contract within the scope of authorization, then such a contract can generally be said to be effective.
legal ground
Article 146 of the General Principles of the Civil Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) * * * The civil juristic act carried out by the actor or the counterpart for false intention is invalid. The validity of a concealed civil juristic act with false intention shall be handled in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.