When a car is being repaired, it needs to be repaired in a repair shop. Sometimes, the repair shop staff will go out to test the car. If they have a car accident and cause death, the car owner may be responsible. This needs to be specific. Detailed analysis of the problem.

1. If the vehicle has the owner's permission and an accident occurs, the owner must bear certain responsibilities

When the vehicle needs repair, sometimes it is a big problem, such as engine replacement, For these problems, such as changing gearboxes, etc., the vehicle needs to be tested out, and the car owner psychologically agrees with it. There may be no relevant agreement signed (if it is a 4S store, some maintenance agreements should be signed), and the vehicle may be driven out.

The staff of ordinary repair shops may not pay attention when they go out to test the car, and a traffic accident occurs, resulting in death. For this situation, the car owner has a certain responsibility. This responsibility is an entrusted responsibility. The car owner's responsibility is very small, but he still has to bear certain responsibilities.

According to the relevant provisions of the law, when the manager and the user are not the same person, if a traffic accident causes damage and it is the responsibility of the motor vehicle party, the driver of the motor vehicle shall bear the liability for compensation, and the owner of the vehicle shall be liable for compensation. If you are at fault, you need to bear some responsibility.

In this process, the car owner assumes that the vehicle can be driven out. Therefore, in this process, the car owner has certain responsibilities. Of course, this responsibility is small. Some netizens think that the car owner has some responsibility? certainly! As an adult, you naturally know that accidents may occur while driving outside.

The car owner may feel wronged, but it is also possible to learn a lesson from this incident. It's best to keep an eye out when repairing your car in the future. Otherwise, you may get into a lawsuit due to your negligence, and you may also lose some property, which is a bit more than the gain is worth the loss.

2. If the car owner does not allow it, there is no need to take responsibility

If the vehicle is not undergoing major repairs, such as repainting or replacing the bumper, there is no reason for the car owner to agree. The repair shop staff takes the vehicle out because these jobs do not require going out for a test drive. And this staff member drove out without permission. If something goes wrong, the staff member will naturally be responsible.

If the responsible party is a pedestrian, then the maintenance shop staff will also need to bear certain liability for compensation. However, the car owner does not know about this, so there will be no joint liability. Some people question that this responsibility should be borne by the maintenance factory, and the maintenance factory should claim compensation from its employees. The determination of this legal liability has nothing to do with the car owner and is not within the scope of our discussion.

When an employee of a maintenance shop drives out without permission and an accident occurs, the responsibility falls naturally on him, not the maintenance shop. If he drove improperly, he would be liable not only for compensation (compensating the victim's family and the owner's vehicle maintenance costs), but he might also lose his job.

Because of him, the car owner and the repair shop may still have a lawsuit, because the repair shop needs to pay for the damage to the vehicle. If a used car is sold and the maintenance record is recorded, the value will depreciate greatly. This cost will definitely have to be paid by the repair shop. After the repair shop pays the compensation, it will then seek compensation from the employees.

Sometimes, you still have to watch the car repair with your own eyes, otherwise, the vehicle may be driven out. If something goes wrong, many people will feel psychologically awkward. Your car is yours, not someone else's to drive around. When this happens, the car owner may sell the car.

3. The maintenance shop’s employees drove the vehicle out privately. Although the nature remains to be investigated, the car owner has the right to sue

The maintenance shop’s employees drove the vehicle out privately. As far as the car owner is concerned, That's unacceptable, especially if it's a car accident. The question here is whether the employee stole it or opened it secretly. Some people think this vehicle is good. Although it does not have a large vehicle cost, it is still possible to sell it at a good price. There is still a possibility!

If this is the case, and the car is driven out by an employee of the maintenance shop and causes an accident, then this person will not only be liable for compensation, but also bear legal liability. The car owner does not need to compensate, and the repair shop must be held accountable. The cooperative relationship between him and the repair shop should be over.

There is also a possibility that the car was driven out secretly and an accident occurred. The employee is responsible for this, but the car owner has the right to sue. Because this error was caused by poor supervision of the repair shop.

You can’t blame anyone else for this! The car owner is suing the repair shop, and the repair shop needs to compensate the car owner for his losses. There will be no cooperation between car owners and repair shops.

The maintenance shop probably did not expect that such a big problem would arise if they were not careful in supervision. When the lawsuit between the repair shop and the car owner is over, it's time to deal with the employees. As for whether he should be compensated or punished with work, it is a matter of negotiation between the repair shop and the employees, and has nothing to do with the car owner.

As a car owner, what you need to do is to keep relevant evidence so that it can be used when suing the repair shop. Although I was very angry after the car hit me, being angry cannot solve the problem. Preserving good evidence is the key. It's quite frustrating to encounter a repair shop like this.

It is normal for car owners to go to a repair shop to repair their cars. What is unusual is that the employee takes the car out, hits someone, encounters a problem, and just solves the problem. There is no need to have a hard time with yourself because of the fault of the maintenance shop employees. Because Plato said that being angry is punishing oneself for the mistakes of others. What do you think?