It would be terrible to encounter the "dark" haze during the beautiful Spring Festival! And set off some yarn fireworks? !

Haha, if the smog is as severe as the last time in Beijing, would we still be able to see the beautiful fireworks even if the fireworks were set off?

Although I live in a small county town, I still only choose to make an appointment with my friends during the "Liao Tianpeng" (a traditional custom in my hometown. Lighting a pile of firewood and setting off firecrackers to show that firewood (wealth) is prosperous) on New Year's Eve. Let's let it go. Although our small county is not afraid of air pollution, let alone smog, cannon shells and garbage are all over the streets, which really affects the good mood during the Spring Festival!

So it is recommended that no matter where you are, it is better to set off less. It will be okay if you are not satisfied with the intention of setting off. If there is no beautiful sun and blue sky during the Spring Festival, and there is a thick "smog", what can you do? In a good mood? !

However, after reading so many reports and activities about the setting off of fireworks during the Spring Festival, why do you think that the issue of whether there will be haze during the Spring Festival is directly "transplanted" to "fireworks and firecrackers"? It seems that the "smog" can be suppressed without setting off fireworks during the Spring Festival!

Maybe the author’s expression is ambiguous, but in the face of such serious pollution and more accurate meteorological data, why are experts so ambiguous and only mention certain cities? They directly list the names of cities and prohibit fireworks. Aren’t fireworks more effective in controlling and preventing the “haze” during the Spring Festival? !

Set off less or no fireworks and firecrackers, which can indeed reduce air pollution in the short term. However, the problem is the "pollutants" produced by setting off fireworks and firecrackers, which pollute the air and the environment in the long term. Is the "consequence" the same as the popular "smog" now? Which one is more "serious"?

To transfer the target so easily, I personally think it is an "expert-level" "random" act!

In addition, how come we only see more “signatures” and “expert analysis” to control the “smog” during the Spring Festival, but not more measures to control the “smog” at all?

"Smog" refers to industrial or post-industrial pollution. Why not express it directly as pollution, but choose the more "poetic" "smog"?

Faced with such serious pollution in Beijing, why do we only see more reports and so-called data analysis, and why do we not admit that it is industrial pollution? What role can these “actions” play in mitigating and eradicating pollution?

What is even more sad and "funny" is that there is even a "farce" in which the meteorological department and other management departments compete for the "right" to forecast "haze"! It's useless to fight for this. Is it possible that some department's forecast can directly scare away the "smog"!

So, to control and prevent "smog", it is better to take more practical and specific measures to control pollution! We don’t want to see the “capital” shrouded in “smog”, no, “pollution”!