Moreover, the following comments have also pointed the finger at Yibo, thinking that Yibo fans disrupt the platform and get themselves into trouble, but they want to drag the whole pink circle into the water. Some objective netizens believe that this article is not clear about which one it is, but it will inevitably connect people at this time. So what's the connection between this article and Ebo? Let's briefly review it first.
In order to maintain the score of Yibo's works in Douban, Yibo fans called on a large number of fans to score, so as to ensure that the score of works was maintained at an ideal level. So under the call of Pink Head, many fans prepared several accounts and completed the process of "raising the number" according to the tutorial. At the same time, for netizens who give bad reviews, fans think that they deliberately give low marks to Yibo's new works, so it seems reasonable to leave a number for high marks.
However, raising a number is actually very complicated. If you want to be a weighty old number, you need to look at a certain number of works and then grade the unpopular works. As a result, there was a controversy that Ebo fans gave low marks to other works, which annoyed many parties. An editor posted: Yibo's pink circle, please stay away from my book! This caused a wave of controversy on the Internet.
It's really hard for People's Daily to issue this comment on "guarantee number" and illegal production data at this point in time without being associated with the storm of Ebo.
For the time being, aside from the "guarantee number" incident of Ebo fans, the "false prosperity" of social platform data has a long history. Positive hot search can be bought, and negative hot search can be withdrawn. Hundreds of thousands and millions of reposts, comments and praises are probably the result of fraud by black companies, and criticism has become a routine operation of fans. Normal forwarding and comments degenerate into traffic fraud, which has a lot of influence.
On the one hand, it affects normal network users, and everyone regards social platform data as a way to judge whether a star is red or not, which will be misled by false data; Manipulated hot search and fake data will also make it difficult for network users to judge news hotspots, and public resources will be consumed by fake data. In addition, the constant criticism of fans also makes people unable to see the real public opinion, netizens and attitudes.
On the other hand, it affects brands and investors, celebrity endorsements and advertisements are difficult to see the real effect, and the normal business order is disturbed.
So who should take the blame for social platforms? Improving the digital praise data has become a black product. The criminals behind it are suspected of online fraud, breaking the law and causing property losses to citizens, and should be punished. However, they are the inevitable product of the abnormal development of social platforms. It can be said that only dealing with this part is a temporary solution, and it is difficult to eliminate it.
Should fans take responsibility? Social platforms have become the main front for fans to idolize and idolize. They are the target users of black products and are willing to spend money on hot search and all kinds of false data. Therefore, fans are actually victims of black production, mainly paying for these false data. But the nature is different. Idolization is the freedom and right of fans, and fans can't be blamed.
In the final analysis, social platforms are too profit-seeking in operation and function development. They turned the hot search, which should have reflected the news fever, into a product that can be bought and sold, derived the super-talk ranking from the daily check-in of fans, and used various fancy games to induce fans to make profits. This is the fundamental reason why the social platform has fallen to this step.
Therefore, People's Daily also pointed out that Internet platform enterprises must fulfill their platform responsibilities, actively purify the platform ecology, optimize management processes, and strictly review the mechanism, so as not to leave living space for "black accounts". Only when the standardized management of social platforms is completed can the current chaos be completely eliminated.
When it comes to the Yibo storm, it is not advisable for fans to "leave a number", whether it is praise for Yibo's works or bad comments on other innocent works. Not only will it "help others" to give black products a living space, but it will also mislead netizens and consumers and spend money on works they don't like. Isn't this just disturbing the order of the Internet?
In addition, in fact, these actions of fans seem to support their own fans. In fact, it is easy to backfire, but they pull fans into the whirlpool of public opinion disputes. The 227 incident in Shawnli is a good example. Is it necessary for Yibo to follow in his footsteps? I hope fans can be rational and idolized, and stop doing these operations that disturb the normal internet order.