Question 1: Is it valid to print or fax a document that needs to be stamped with official seal? The seal of the document shall be the original and stamped with the official seal, and the official seal of the copy or fax is invalid. Of course, if both parties decide to use the fax official seal through consultation, the fax official seal will be valid.

In addition, if the official seal is printed and distributed through a special electronic signature system, it has the same legal effect as the manual seal.

Question 2: Is the seal on the certificate printed effectively? As long as the real seal is printed through the electronic signature system, it has the same legal effect as the manual seal. Copy, no matter what is invalid.

Question 3: Does the printed electronic seal still have legal effect? Electronic seals generally prove that this thing is mine, some irrelevant certificates. Effective, but weak. Once you start a lawsuit, this kind of thing is not very effective

Question 4: Is the printed official seal valid? Hello: Theoretically, the contract should come into effect after being signed and sealed by both parties. You signed a labor contract with the company, but the company didn't stamp it, only the personnel stamped it. Strictly speaking, the contract has not come into effect yet. At the same time, according to the relevant provisions of the Contract Law, before the contract is signed, one party fulfills the main obligations of the contract, and the other party accepts it, which is regarded as the establishment of the contract. The contract came into effect again. Because the labor contract law stipulates that a written labor contract must be signed, the current situation is equivalent to not signing a contract and should pay double wages. But it is hard for you to prove it, and it is hard for you to prove it in practice. The unit only needs to stamp a new official seal on the contract. As for the situation that there is no clear wage agreement, it is against the law, but only the clause can be deemed invalid, not the whole contract. So it's hard for you to advocate doubling the company.

Question 5: The contract has been stamped and signed. Whether a contract is valid or not is generally signed and sealed. If the printed one cannot be confirmed, the contract is invalid.

Question 6: Is it effective to print the official seal of the contract, and is the signature also printed? There is no problem in printing the contract, but don't print the signature and seal, you must sign it yourself. Otherwise, it is impossible to determine whether one party really agrees and signs.

Question 7: Does the printed official seal belong to the original or copy, and does it have legal effect? Belongs to the original and has legal effect. At present, the official seals of many state organs are printed directly, but not everyone can print them, which requires certain procedures.

Question 8: Is it valid to stamp the computer printed contract with official seal? As long as it is sealed, the contract is valid whether it is handwritten or printed, unless it violates the prohibition of the law or there are other circumstances that lead to the invalidity of the contract.

Question 9: Is it official to print the document with official seal after scanning? When you scan and print, it means copying, whether it is color copying or black and white copying.

Can only be used as a copy. Can't replace the original. Seal and seal are different, you can recognize them at a glance. If the color official seal is modified after copying, once it achieves the same effect as the real seal, it is called forgery. )

Therefore, there is only one original, and no matter how it is done, it can only be a copy. Understand this.