“What we restore is not Jay Chou’s reputation, but the reputation of a righteous Chinese.”?

Reposted from. \Bian Yun?

?

If there is anything in this world that travels faster than light, it must be a rumor; if there is anything more lethal than nuclear weapons, it is still a rumor ——One person's mouth is close to another person's ear...and then a huge wave rolls into the sky, swallowing everything. ?

Since February 2005, so-called interview records similar to this have begun to circulate on the Internet: ?

"Are you Chinese?"?

"No, I am Taiwanese."?

This dialogue has been passed down intermittently to this day, and the effect is still very popular. It has been tried and tested in any event at any time. The rumor makers have no sense of innovation, and the partial believers have not caused visual or auditory fatigue. The two cooperate with each other to meet their needs. SHE, Jay Chou and other Taiwanese artists have been labeled as "Taiwan independence elements" for five years without any reason. ?

After the Yushu earthquake, a QQ blog titled "Jay Chou is not a human being" once again launched a fierce attack on Jay Chou, bringing a topical aftershock to the online world. ?

The author boldly wrote at the beginning and end, "Who is Jay Chou's fan will kill the whole family?" "If you don't change after reading this, the whole family will die." The author's vicious curse had an obvious effect. Many fans became timid, became gullible, and left. This article, like cell division, has been retweeted, copied, and spread again and again...?

The content of Baishi, in summary, is: Jay Chou only donated 50,000 yuan, but remained the same in the face of interviews It is the unshakable "I am not Chinese". ?

I don’t know any reporter who is so stupid and doesn’t bother asking the same question dozens of times over the years. I don’t know how good Jay Chou’s psychological quality is. He has been bombarded by netizens for so many years and still openly denies that he is Chinese. ?

It is said that he made a mistake. Why did he make a mistake so many times in one sentence? He said he was not afraid of death, but why didn't he dare to admit it when asked by the media? ?

I also don’t understand why the first person to publish this interview record was not the interviewer or the media, but an ordinary netizen. Did the interviewer intentionally cover up Jay Chou? Did this netizen friend sneak into the house or install a bug on Jay Chou during the interview?

When publishing this so-called interview record, they did not provide any evidence such as video, recording, or interview source to support their remarks. This is very suspicious in itself. Do I still need to provide evidence to prove Jay Chou's innocence? ? He has no evidence to prove Jay Chou's Taiwan independence. This is my evidence.

When collecting Olympic songs in 2008, Jay Chou said in an interview in Mainland China that he hoped that the lyrics "must have something Chinese style in it, because the Olympics are being held in our own country, so we must write something." Things related to one’s own country.” "Our own country", this is his position; at an award show, the host asked Jay to greet Korean fans in Korean. Jay said: "The wind is very serious in Kazakhstan now, I think Chinese is very diao, we want to promote China Culture, so I sing Chinese style, if you want to communicate with me, please speak Mandarin”!

?

Unless Jay Chou is out of his mind and sings Chinese style while denying that he is Chinese.

After the Wenchuan earthquake, Jay Chou donated more than 10 million (this figure has official certification, so I won’t go into details here), but he was slandered and only donated 500,000. During the Yushu earthquake, Jay Chou "regardless of past grievances" and still actively participated in the earthquake relief front line, and those people still clung to Jay Chou and continued to spread rumors and slander... Once is okay, twice is okay, but what about the third time? What about the fourth time? Do you have to demotivate all his or their enthusiasm before you are willing to do so? ?

Celebrity donations are meant to set an example for fans and use their influence to mobilize more people to participate. If Jay Chou is destroyed by rumors, there is no guarantee that the hundreds of millions of fans behind Jay Chou will not lose confidence in charity. ?

Jay Chou is relatively low-key, and each donation is not a one-time donation, unlike some celebrities who donate some money for fear that the media will not know about it. This is one of the reasons why people misunderstand him. Although love cannot be measured by money, money is indispensable in the face of disasters. Every penny more means more hope in the disaster area. Donating 50,000 yuan even made Jay Chou feel embarrassed. How could he create excuses for himself and wait to be scolded by others? ?

I strongly suggest that the comrades who want to discredit Jay Chou should change their words and say "Jay Chou refused to donate money and published an article "Stop donating money and materials to the people of Yushu"". Only in this way can there be technical content. , which is more impactful.

?

Why is it always Jay Chou who is injured instead of Jay Chou and Jay Chou? There is a saying that "the trees that are beautiful in the forest will be destroyed by the wind." Jay Chou has become a leader in the pop music scene at a young age. He has made many movies recently and has a new album about to be released. As people become more and more famous, others will become more and more popular. Jealous. ?

However, those media that are supposed to play a supervisory role and guide correct public opinion only want to sell the truth, not the truth, only the effect, regardless of the consequences, and regard rumors as news. Has the moral standard in the hearts of these unscrupulous media slipped to their navel? ?

During the national crisis, while Jay Chou was doing his best in the disaster area, some people were chewing gum and chewing their tongues in front of the computer screen. These people did not donate money, go to the front line, or pay attention to the disaster. I actually pay attention to which celebrity has donated how much money, who is at the top of the list, and who is at the bottom. Those people who look like they have nothing to do with themselves in front of a ranking list that has no credibility at all. What qualifications do you have to condemn and abuse others? ? When many people stood up to clarify for Jay Chou, some people asked: "Is Jay Chou your father?" Martin Niem?ller once said this: "When they (Nazis) arrest ***. When they arrested the Jews, I remained silent because I was not a Jew; when they arrested members of the anti-Nazi movement, I remained silent because I was not a Communist. I was not involved; when they finally arrested me, no one spoke for me..." Jay Chou is not my father, but Jay Chou is not your son either, so why do you have the right to slander, curse, and abuse someone who has nothing to do with you? people?

In reality, we are bound by various morals, rules, interest relationships, etc. Speech cannot be completely free, but on the Internet you can say what you want without complimenting anyone or catering to anyone, but this does not mean that we can be unscrupulous. You can ignore the pros and cons, you can challenge the rules, but you cannot despise morality. Morality, it is the true nature of human nature, it is what we stick to willingly and naturally. It should not be required, but now, morality has been forgotten again and again and reminded again and again...?

Someone It is said that silence is the best way to deal with rumors. Jay Chou has been surrounded by rumors since his debut, and he has indeed been silent. However, as a result, there were more and more rumors, and they became more and more mysterious. Jay Chou understands that he can no longer condone these rumor makers, and now he finally takes up legal weapons. So now, we are patiently waiting for the Internet police to find out the culprit, to give Jay Chou his innocence, and to give a just Chinese person his innocence. ?

The basis for condemning a person is not based on rumors or hearsay, but on the truth. If there were fewer people in this world who look on coldly and add insult to injury, if there were fewer people in this society who just follow what others say and follow the crowd, if there were fewer people in this era who talk about benevolence, justice and morality but only commit male thieves and female prostitutes, then hypocrisy, evil and ugliness would never have a place to survive. ?

Please use your black and white eyes to distinguish the black and white in the world.

?