Current location - Quotes Website - Personality signature - Is it valid for a husband to forge his wife's signature in a family property division agreement?
Is it valid for a husband to forge his wife's signature in a family property division agreement?
Hello, patient. As an agreement between the two parties, the agreement needs to be the true meaning of both parties. The forged signature of one party has no legal effect, the agreement does not take effect, and the other half and the third party cannot be bound.

In addition, if both parties agree to divorce, they can still request the dissolution of the property division agreement after the agreement divorce. However, after the people's court hears the case, if there is no fraud or coercion when concluding the property division agreement, your claim will be rejected. In particular, once the divorce agreement is signed, it has legal effect, and both parties should be bound by the agreement. When there are no special circumstances stipulated by law, the people's court will not easily revoke the divorce agreement. If it wants to cancel, it must be filed within one year after the divorce agreement. Of course, if there is a dispute over the division of property and maintenance after divorce by agreement, you can bring a lawsuit to the court for the property dispute or custody dispute after divorce with the assistance of a lawyer.

Relevant laws and regulations

Article 1076 of the Civil Code: If a husband and wife divorce voluntarily, they shall sign a written divorce agreement and apply for divorce registration in person at the marriage registration office. The divorce agreement shall specify the expression of willingness of both parties to divorce and the consensus on matters such as child support, property and debt disposal.

Article 70 of the Interpretation of Marriage and Family in the Civil Code (I): If the husband and wife agree to divorce and repent on the issue of property division, the people's court shall accept it.

After trial, the people's court found that there was no fraud or coercion in concluding the property division agreement, and rejected the litigant's claim according to law.