Recently, Jiangsu Construction Project Bidding Network notified four enterprises to bid together:
The electronic bidding documents of Jiangsu X Hui Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu X Tong Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. show the same cost lock number.
Punishment: The two enterprises were fined 1.983 million yuan respectively, and the directly responsible person in charge was fined 99 1 yuan respectively.
Shanghai X Source Architectural Design Co., Ltd. and Shanghai X Latitude Architectural Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd. have the same file making machine code.
Punishment: Two enterprises were recorded in the bad behavior files and publicized for 3 months.
Additional announcement
String label story
In fact, it is not surprising that there is collusion.
At present, the common forms of bidding are electronic bidding and paper bidding.
The preliminary work must have been arranged before bidding.
The last step is to submit the tender.
At this time, something interesting came.
He thus exposed a collusion!
20 19 of a project in Anqing
Actually, 146 enterprises "bid in collusion"
Finally, the bid bond of 6,543,800+0.6 million was confiscated for each house.
A total of 23.36 million
Reason: The consumption and group price of the same sub-item of different companies are abnormally the same, the group price and supplementary quota number are abnormally the same, the group price and adjustment coefficient are abnormally the same, the consumption and supplementary quota numbers are abnormally the same, and the group price is abnormally the same. It was finally identified as "collusive bidding".
Make the machine code consistent and be fined!
Just in June this year, two construction enterprises in Jiangsu were exposed to collusive bidding. Because the machine codes of the bidders were the same, they were given an administrative penalty of 3,365,438 yuan +0.29 yuan respectively.
All five units bid the same, and all the deposits are confiscated!
2065438+2008 Fujian Quanzhou Gong * * * Resource Trading Center released the publicity of the winning candidate, which not only announced the winning candidate of the project, but also notified the MAC address (MAC address, CPU serial number, hard disk serial number) of the tendering units of five units (three units and two units) respectively, which were regarded as the same bidding document, and the bid bond of five units would not be returned.
1. Fujian * * Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., Fujian * * Landscape Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. and Fujian * * * Construction Co., Ltd.: According to the evaluation platform, the MAC addresses of these three bidders are the same: MAC address: 08-62-66-83-42-EF, CPU serial number; BFEBFBFF000306C3, serial number of hard disk: WD-WCC3F7XLV 1EU are all the same, which violates Article 20.6 of Fujian General Bidding Document (Revised Edition 20 17): Bidders' bidding documents are regarded as identical in the following cases; According to clause 18.3 of the general instructions of the tender documents, the insurance deposit will not be refunded.
2. Fujian Nanping * * Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. and Fujian Nanping Jiu * Construction Engineering Co., Ltd.: According to the evaluation platform, the MAC addresses of the two bidders are the same: -3F-D5-98-7C-E7, 00-E0-4f-68-1-BD, and the CPU serial number is BFF. Clause 20.6 of the Instructions for Bidders who violate the Fujian Provincial Standards for Housing Construction and Municipal Infrastructure Engineering (Revised Edition 20 17): The bidding documents of bidders shall be regarded as the same under the following circumstances; According to clause 18.3 of the general instructions of the tender documents, the insurance deposit will not be refunded.
Uploading tenders on the same computer was fined 2.3 million.
The official website of Guangzhou Housing and Urban-Rural Development Committee publicly reported a bid rigging case. Two construction companies and two bid leaders were fined more than 2.3 million yuan.
Parties: Fujian Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. and Fujian Construction Group Co., Ltd.
Reason for punishment: The electronic bidding documents of the two companies participating in the project bidding are encrypted and packaged on the same computer and compiled by the same unit, so it is considered as collusive bidding.
Related punishment: (* * * 2,304,498 yuan)
Fujian * * Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. fined 1076868 yuan;
Wen Tingqing, the person directly responsible for the bidding of * * construction company, was fined 7538 1 yuan;
Fujian * * Construction Group Co., Ltd. fined 1076868 yuan;
Sun Jie, the person directly responsible for the bidding of * * construction company, was fined 7538 1 yuan.
therefore
Don't underestimate the "electronic bidding system"
It is smarter than you think.
How powerful is the electronic bidding platform?
(1) automatically screening whether different bidding documents are made by the same computer;
(2) automatically calculate the summary score to assist the bid evaluation experts in judging whether to bid around;
(3) All links are traceable, all data are automatically filed, and the whole process can be traced, which can realize dynamic monitoring, real-time early warning, intelligent assistance and whole process recording.
What collusion is easy to be seen through?
The bidding documents are identical, such as the same format, the same font and the same table color.
In the tender documents, the mistakes are consistent.
In electronic bidding, the IP addresses registered by different bidders are the same, or the IP addresses are in a specific area.
The bidding documents of different bidders are compiled by the same computer or printed by the same auxiliary equipment.
The binding form, thickness and cover of bidding documents are similar or even the same.
In the bidding documents of one bidder, the document with the name of another bidder is bound, for example, the signature of another legal representative or authorized agent appears and the official seal of another bidder is stamped.
The bidder's representative doesn't know the telephone number of the company boss.
Different bidders sat in the same car before the bid opening, talking and laughing, but pretended not to know each other at the bid opening site.
The total bid price of different bidders is unusually consistent, or extremely different, or changes regularly.
The total quotations of different bidders are similar, but the quotations of each item are unreasonable and there is no reasonable explanation.
The winning bidder intentionally cancels or abandons the bid or fails to sign a contract with the tenderer as required without justifiable reasons.
Deliberately making invalid bidding documents in accordance with the invalid bidding clauses stipulated in the bidding documents.
After the bidder has participated in the registration for three times or more within one year and purchased the bidding documents, it will no longer submit the bidding documents or attend the bid opening meeting.
Before the deadline for submission of bid documents, several bidders issued statements to withdraw their bid documents almost at the same time.
The bid bonds of different bidders shall be paid through the same account.
Multiple bidders use the bid guarantee issued by the same person or enterprise.
The after-sales service terms are the same.
Deliberately omitting the signature of the legal representative.
The signature of the legal representative in the bidding documents comes from the same person.
For more information about project/service/procurement bidding, and to improve the winning rate, please click on the bottom of official website Customer Service for free consultation:/#/? source=bdzd