From 2020 1 month 1, I formally petitioned and asked Changning No.2 Cement Factory to retire for my mother. It has been going on for nearly five months. The Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology, as the competent unit of the No.2 Cement Plant, not only resorted to fraud, but also set up checkpoints to make things difficult.
Be pushed from pillar to post and refused to accept. As the director of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology, Deng Qinghua has made seven regulatory oversight:
First, in 2020 1 month 10, Deng Yongjun, deputy director of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology, asked us to attend the petition coordination meeting. At the meeting, Wu Jiannan, director of the Letters and Calls Office of the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology, told us without hesitation:
At that time, in the second cement plant of Changning City, a state-owned enterprise, if you want to have good welfare and become a regular worker as soon as possible, the most important thing is to handle the relationship with the factory director, give more gifts and curry favor with the factory director, and handle the relationship well. Some jobs turned positive in a month or two, but the relationship was not handled well. Some jobs are hard to become regular workers after seven or eight years or even more than ten years. Later, Deng Yongjun, deputy director of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology, became angry when he saw that we did not accept their "letting go" treatment, and threatened us on the spot, and threatened that if I continued to petition, my future work would be in trouble. (as evidenced by the recording).
As the director of the Municipal Science and Technology Bureau, Deng Qinghua, his subordinates are so blatantly advocating bureaucracy, intimidating petitioners and obstructing citizens from petitioning for rights protection. This is one of the poor supervision and oversight of Deng Qinghua, director of the Municipal Science and Technology Bureau.
2. On October 9, 2020, Wu Jiannan, director of the Letters and Calls Office of the Municipal Science and Technology Bureau, and He, the clerk, forged my signature, and the first reply issued by the Municipal Science and Technology Bureau was "I can't prepare, so I closed the case in a hurry" (the time for forging the signature was October 7, 2020/KLOC-0). This is the second time that Deng Qinghua, director of the Municipal Science, Technology and Communication Bureau, has neglected supervision and neglected his duties.
The petition office of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology forged the signature of the petitioner. So far, the Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has not handled official documents. At the same time, the rhetoric in this first reply of the Municipal Science and Information Bureau is mainly used to shirk responsibility at the meeting on 1 month 10, which is unacceptable.
Thirdly, after the forged signature of the petitioner was exposed, on 23rd 1 month, 2020, Wu Jiannan, the director of the Municipal Letters and Calls Office, and He Ji, the clerk of the No.2 Cement Factory of the Municipal Science and Technology Bureau, together with Lei Guicheng, Chen Deli, Tang Chuanzhi, committed perjury. They gave birth to their third child before April of 198 1 and were expelled from the second cement plant, so they made false statements and slandered my mother.
Facts speak louder than words, and sooner or later they will be ashamed of perjury in public. We have the household registration certificate of the local police station: my sister was born in February 1980, and I was born in March 198 1 year. My sister was born in 1982, and my mother was suspended for nearly a year.
This perjury investigation report was published on the provincial petition platform by the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology. Especially after the perjury was exposed, the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology tried to excuse the scandal in one sentence: "The time is as long as forty years, and the time node is not sure." This is the third time that Deng Qinghua, director of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology, has failed in supervision and supervision.
Fourthly, after the investigation report on perjury was completed, the Municipal Bureau of Science and Information Technology couldn't wait to give us a second reply on 1 25th. In this second reply, the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology first excused the complainant's signature forgery for the petition office and characterized it as "the delivery procedure was not in place". Later, I insisted that I was expelled from the Second Cement Plant because 198 1 gave birth to a third child in April in violation of family planning.
On the basis of obvious perjury, the Municipal Science and Technology Communication Bureau sent us a second reply hastily without any investigation and verification, regardless of the legitimate rights and interests of petitioners and social impact. This is the fourth oversight and dereliction of duty of Deng Qinghua, director of the Municipal Science and Technology Communication Bureau.
Fifth, on March 2, 2020, the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology gave us a third reply. In this third reply, around the three questions we mentioned, the Municipal Science and Information Bureau continued to justify itself:
1. The Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology continued to confirm that I was expelled from the Second Cement Plant in April because of198/kloc-0.
2. The Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology, Industry and Information Technology said that the petition office forged the signature of the petitioner and was being investigated and handled by the Changning Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection. In fact, until May 20, 2020, the petitioner had not seen any official handling documents of the Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision on the forgery of the petitioner's signature by the petition office.
3. In view of the "Perjury Crime-Investigation Report" collected by the Letters and Calls Office of the Municipal Science and Technology Bureau on 23 1 2020, the Municipal Science and Technology Bureau acquitted Wu Jiannan and He on suspicion of * * * crimes and collusion crimes.
In this third reply, the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology mentioned three questions. In our opinion, not only none of them have been effectively solved, but they are obviously glass fragments. As for other charges and one-sided words, it will naturally be broken.
This third reply, which is totally unrealistic and only for shirking responsibility, has been approved by Deng Qinghua, director of the Municipal Science and Technology Communication Bureau, and issued. This is the fifth oversight and dereliction of duty of Deng Qinghua, director of the Municipal Science and Technology Communication Bureau.
Perhaps they themselves realized the absurdity of the third reply, which led to the fourth reply that attracted much attention.
Sixth, on May 7, 2020, when Yi and Deng Honghua of the Municipal Science and Technology Bureau sent the fourth reply directly issued by the Municipal Science and Technology Bureau, regardless of the specific content of the reply, they directly threw the fourth reply on the ground and left. Their attitude is extremely bad and unprofessional. Their attitude towards petitioners is really detrimental to the image of Changning organs and units. This is the lack of supervision by Deng Qinghua, director of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology, Industry and Information Technology.
Seventh, on May 7, 2020, the fourth reply issued by the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology finally came to light, which was obviously contradictory, shattered glass. In this fourth reply, the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology made up a new conclusion: It is said that my mother was terminated due to family planning problems in March of 198 1 year (note that they said this time was in March of 198 1 year). Older people know that in 198 1, if the first child is a family with a daughter, another child can be born. At that time, it was not mandatory to have only one child. At that time, families with two children accounted for the vast majority. As for my sister, she was born after being suspended for nearly a year, which has nothing to do with the reason why my mother was suspended. And according to them, my second child was not born in March of Gregorian calendar 198 1. My mother had only one daughter at that time. How can I have illegal family planning? How was the employment contract terminated? This is the seventh oversight and dereliction of duty of Deng Qinghua, director of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology, Industry and Information Technology.
So far, the Municipal Science and Technology Communication Bureau has issued four replies and made four shady moves besides cheating and setting up checkpoints to make things difficult.
Is to push from pillar to post and refuse to accept it.
As the director of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology, Deng Qinghua neglected his duty seven times. What is his conscience?
For details, please see: /PeopleShow.asp? ID=3888670